Preview

Veterinary Science Today

Advanced search

Serological tests for lumpy skin disease in Republic of Tajikistan in 2023

https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2026-15-1-60-66

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

Introduction. Cattle farming plays a key role in the agriculture of the Republic of Tajikistan, satisfying not only the needs for meat and dairy products. Recently, the intensification of livestock production in Tajikistan has been facing serious problems related to infectious diseases, in particular those caused by capripoxviruses, including lumpy skin disease (LSD), which causes significant economic damage and compromises animal performance and health in the region and around the world. Studying and understanding the LSD epizootology in the Republic of Tajikistan climatic environment will facilitate better disease control.
Objective. Epizootological data collection and brief description of LSD outbreaks in the Republic of Tajikistan in 2023.
Materials and methods. Traditional epizootological analysis tools were used to collect data on LSD outbreaks, as well as serological tools for the disease retrospective diagnosis.
Results. In 2023, an LSD case was first reported in the Republic of Tajikistan in the region bordering Afghanistan. Analysis of the seasonal pattern of the disease occurrence in Tajikistan demonstrated that the LSD outbreaks were most often reported in summer and autumn: from July to November. The disease spread mainly in the areas with a high concentration of livestock, in particular in the Khatlon Region. The average animal density in the Khatlon Region is 46 cattle per 1 km2 and 117 sheep and goats per 1 km2. The peak of LSD epidemic was recorded in September – November 2023. Morbidity and mortality varied by districts, ranging from 10 to 55% and from 2 to 15%, respectively. Tests of 216 bovine serum samples demonstrated LSD virus antibodies in 109 animals, accounting for 50.5% of the total.
Conclusion. In 2023, a range of studies was conducted and measures were taken in the Republic of Tajikistan to prevent LSD spread. To effectively control the disease, it is necessary to strengthen epizootological monitoring, carry out timely vaccination of animals and implement measures for the identification and control of potential vectors. These steps will minimize economic losses and maintain the animal health in the republic.

For citations:


Atovullozoda R.A., Shumilova I.N., Korennoy F.I., Amirbekov M.A., Nazrullozoda S.Kh., Sharipov R.M., Kosimov S.M., Byadovskaya O.P., Krotova A.O., Sprygin A.V. Serological tests for lumpy skin disease in Republic of Tajikistan in 2023. Veterinary Science Today. 2026;15(1):60-66. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2026-15-1-60-66

INTRODUCTION

Lumpy skin disease (LSD, Neethling virus infection) is a viral transmissible disease of cattle characterized by fever, damage to the lymphatic system, edema of subcutaneous tissue and internal organs, formation of skin nodules, damage to the eyes and mucous membranes of the respiratory and digestive systems, loss of productive performance and body weight [1]. The disease causative agent is a DNA-containing virus of the genus Capripoxvirus, family Poxviridae, which is closely related to sheep pox virus and goat pox virus [2].

Lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) spread outside the disease outbreak is possible in two ways. Firstly, the infected animals demonstrating clinical signs and being in the incubation period are active shedders of the pathogen in an unapparent form [3]. In this case, subclinically infected animals serve not only as an active source of infection, but also as an important factor in the virus spread over long distances, which is most often associated with cattle driving or illegal transportation by road vehicles [4]. It should be noted that LSD causes major economic losses, such as a sharp decline in milk production, reduced milk and raw hide quality, loss of body weight, abortions, infertility in bulls and reduced fertility in cows. As a result, trade relations are prohibited, which negatively affects the economies of countries focused on exporting animal products [5].

It is assumed that the main factor of the disease agent transmission is blood-sucking insects and ticks [6], although it has now been experimentally proven that mosquitoes of the genus Aedes, flies (for example, Stomoxys calcitrans and Biomyia fasciata) and ticks (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma hebraeum) are capable of participating in the virus spread [7]. The importance of various arthropod vectors may vary in climatically different regions depending on their abundance and trophic behavior, however, no relative entomological studies from different geographical and climatic zones have been described. The virus transmission via contaminated semen is possible [8].

Direct contact was not previously considered an effective route of the infection transmission [9], however, given the disease epizootological profile, when the outbreaks can be reported in early spring or autumn in the absence of flight activity of blood-sucking insects, alimentary and air-borne routes of the infection are feasible, since a diseased animal sheds the virus with the nasal discharge and scabs from the necrotized nodes [10]. Evidence of the contact virus transmission has been obtained in a number of studies involving experimental infection of susceptible animals [11].

In the past, the LSD distribution range was limited only to South Africa. However, by 1956, the disease quickly spread to Central and East Africa. The first case of LSD infection outside the African continent was reported in Israel, which marked the beginning of the intercontinental spread of the disease [12][13][14][15][16]. The disease with characteristic signs was detected in Albania, Greece, Georgia, Iran, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Turkey and other countries of the world with numerous outbreaks being reported in recent years [17][18][19]. In the CIS countries (Fig. 1), LSD was officially reported in Azerbaijan (2014), Armenia (2015), Russia (2015), Kazakhstan (2016) [20][21][22].

Fig. 1. CIS members, where LSD is reported

Since 2019, LSD has begun to spread in Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, and Singapore; China, Japan, and South Korea have also reported outbreaks [15][23][24][25][26]. This created a threat of the disease cross-border transmission to the countries of Central Asia. LSD was not reported in the Republic of Tajikistan until 2023, but the massive spread of the infection to the Asian region since 2019 has resulted in the pathogen introduction into the country [25]. In 2023, LSD was for the first time diagnosed in cattle in the border region with Afghanistan, in the Panj District of Khatlon Region, Republic of Tajikistan. The infected animals comprised 30 cattle of varying ages of the Black Pied, Carpathian, Swedish, and local breeds. The disease was observed in animals in Mehnatobod village (Sughd Region), Kahramon village (Rudaki District of Republican Subordination), in Moskovsky settlement (Hamadoni District) as well as in the villages of Farkhor District of Khatlon Region, and then it spread to other regions of the Republic, causing significant economic damage to animal farmers.

The work was aimed at the epizootological description and brief characterization of the LSD outbreaks in the Republic of Tajikistan in 2023.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LSD epizootic situation was studied on animal farms in the southwestern and northern regions of Tajikistan (Sughd Region, Khatlon Region, and the Districts of Republican Subordination), where a combined housing-and-pasture system of cattle management is practiced.

Standard clinical, epizootological, and serological research methods were used in the study. To assess morbidity and mortality, the proportion of diseased and dead animals out of the total susceptible population in the outbreak was calculated.

Serological analysis. To make a preliminary assessment of the situation, 216 serum samples of cattle of different age groups were serologically tested. The sera were collected from animals demonstrating LSD clinical signs in the regions of the Republic located in different climatic and geographical zones (Table 1).

Table 1

Regions of the republic where serological monitoring was carried out

Regions of the Republic

Type of pathological material

Number of tested samples

Khatlon Region

Serum

95

Sughd Region

Serum

58

Districts of Republican Subordination

Serum

63

Total

216

Double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used in the study. The study was performed using a test system for detecting antibodies to capripoxviruses in sera or plasma of cattle, sheep, goats or other susceptible species (IDvet, France) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The serum samples were collected from infected (IN) and contact animals (C1 and C2) on days 0; 42 and 60 after the start of the experiment. The results were interpreted based on optical density (OD) measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using a Sunrise microplate reader (Tecan, Switzerland). They were expressed as the ratio of the optical density of the test sample to the optical density of the positive control (S/P%), calculated as follows: S/P% = (OD sample – OD negative control) / (OD positive control – OD negative control) × 100%. S/P ratio ≥ 30% was considered positive.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Republic of Tajikistan is a landlocked state in Central Asia, characterized by a predominantly mountainous terrain. The area of the country is 142.6 thousands km², the population is 10 million people. As of 2023, the cattle population in the country amounted to 2,605 thousands (FAOstat, 2025). The first-level administrative divisions consist of five units: Sughd Region, Khatlon Region, Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region, the city of Dushanbe, and the Districts of Republican Subordination.

Tajikistan is located in zones of continental, sharply continental, and mountain climate. The country’s climatic conditions are determined by its topography, which encompasses both lowland and high mountain areas. Precipitation is distributed unevenly. The majority of the precipitation falls in winter and spring. Summer in lowland areas is dry.

The disease was first reported in the hot and arid Khatlon Region (in Panj, Farkhor and Hamadoni Districts), where high temperatures and dry climate contribute to the active reproduction of blood-sucking insects, the key virus carriers. The infection subsequently spread to other regions, including the Sughd Region, the city of Dushanbe and Districts of Republican Subordination, where the moderately warm climate, presence of pastures and water reservoirs also create conditions for the disease transmission. The location of the affected areas is shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 2. LSD spread in the Republic of Tajikistan in 2023

In 2023, the majority of LSD outbreaks (14 outbreaks) were reported in the Khatlon Region, where 70% of the Republic’s cattle population is concentrated. Morbidity and mortality of cattle in the Panj District reached 55 and 15%, respectively.

Analyzes of LSD situation in cattle demonstrated that during the further spread of the disease across the Republic in June – August 2023, the mortality in the Faizabad District was 30–40%, and mortality – 2–3%, while in the Gissar valley they were 20 and 3%, respectively.

In the Rasht Valley, where temperate climate prevails, the disease was reported in cattle in November – December. The mortality in this region did not exceed 10%, and the mortality of the infected animals amounted to 3–5%.

In northern Tajikistan, LSD was reported in Ayni, Ghafurov, Konibodom, Panjakent, and Isfara districts of Sughd Region. The cattle morbidity in these regions was 15–20%, and mortality ranged from 3 to 5%.

The disease outbreaks were less intense in the regions of the Badakhshan Mountainous Autonomous Region, which is associated with a lower activity of the insect vectors due to the specifics of the climate and terrain. Despite the fact that this area, located along the border with Afghanistan, occupies more than 43% of the territory of the Republic, it has the lowest animal population and density per 1 km².

The latest disease outbreaks in the Republic of Tajikistan were reported in December 2023 in the Districts of Republican Subordination. Overall, more than 20 outbreaks of LSD were reported during the year, most of them were detected in the summer-autumn period from July to November (Fig. 3). This may be attributed both to the activity of potential vectors and to the pasturing of livestock during this period. The peak of the LSD epizootic in cattle was recorded in September – November 2023. The information obtained is consistent with the published data [27][28][29].

Fig. 3. Number of LSD outbreaks by month

It is important to note that, based on the field data, the incubation period for LSD was approximately 5 days and may have depended on the susceptibility of the animals [30].

Thus, the disease outbreaks were less intense in the mountainous regions of the country, where the harsh climate with low temperatures limits the insect activity. In the foothill areas and pastures, the infection could spread through livestock migration. Consequently, the combination of the hot climate, high animal density, and favorable conditions for insect reproduction have become key factors in the LSD epizootic process in Tajikistan [31].

The diseased animals demonstrated high body temperature (40.5–42.0 °C), nasal and ocular discharge, enlarged lymph nodes (especially patellar and scapular ones), refusal of food, as well as skin nodular eruptions of various shapes and sizes (Fig. 4), and erosive lesions in the oral cavity, including the tongue (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4. Formation of nodular skin lesions on the neck and shoulder blade areas of LSD infected cattle

Fig. 5. Erosive lesions of the tongue mucosa of LSD infected cattle

The number of nodules ranged from ten to several hundred (Fig. 6). During LSD development in lactating cows, nodules of various shapes and sizes often appeared on the udder (Fig. 7). The diseased animals quickly became emaciated and lost their dairy and meat performance for a long time [32].

Fig. 6. Multiple nodular skin lesions of LSD infected cattle

Fig. 7. Nodular and ulcerative lesions on the udder of LSD infected cattle

When ELISA was used to test 216 samples of bovine sera from animals from Khatlon and Sughd Regions and Districts of Republican Subordination, LSDV antibodies were detected in 109 of them, which accounted for 50.5% of the total number of animals (Table 2).

Table 2

LSD ELISA results

Districts

Number of kishlaks

Samples tested

Positive samples detected

Seroprevalence, %

Khatlon Region

Panj

3

27

19

70.4

Hamadoni

4

19

11

57.9

Farkhor

4

15

9

60.0

Vose’

2

11

5

45.5

Kulob

3

8

3

37.5

Bokhtar city

3

15

8

53.3

Sughd Region

Ayni

2

12

4

33.3

Ghafurov

3

10

2

20.0

Konibodom

1

7

2

28.6

Panjakent

1

16

7

43.8

Isfara

1

13

5

38.5

Districts of Republican Subordination

Hisar

2

14

4

28.6

Rudaki

3

21

13

61.9

Faizabad

2

10

5

50.0

Rasht

2

18

12

66.7

Total

36

216

109

50.5

The highest seroprevalence was reported in the Khatlon Region: Panj District (70.4%), Farkhor District (60.0%) and Hamadoni District (57.9%), which indicates a significant spread of infection in this area. In Sughd Region, the highest rates were detected in Panjakent (43.8%) and Isfara Districts (38.5%), and as for the Districts of Republican Subordination, high level of seroprevalence was reported in Rasht (66.7%) and Rudaki Districts (61.9%).

Thus, the study results indicate the transboundary nature of LSD and emphasize the need for further monitoring and the implementation of preventive measures to control the disease situation with the aim of reducing the economic losses.

CONCLUSION

An analysis of the LSD situation in Tajikistan in 2023 showed that the infection outbreaks had seasonal pattern, reaching the peak in the summer and autumn period (July – November). The most affected areas were Khatlon Region, Districts of Republican Subordination and Sughd Region, where the seroprevalence varied from 20.0 to 70.4%. The infection outbreaks were reported both in the backyards and on commercial farms, which indicates the need for strict veterinary control and implementation of preventive measures.

To effectively control LSD, it is necessary to strengthen epizootological monitoring, carry out timely vaccination of animals, and implement measures for the identification and control of potential vectors. These steps will allow minimizing economic losses and maintaining animal health in the Republic.

Contribution of the authors: Atovullozoda R. A. – concept development, resource provision, text preparation and editing, approval of the final version; Shumilova I. N. – text preparation and editing, approval of the final version; Korennoy F. I. – cartographic visualization, text preparation and editing; Amirbekov M. A. – conducting research; Nazrullozoda S. Kh. – conducting research, methodology development, text preparation and editing; Sharipov R. M. – conducting research; Kosimov S. M. – conducting research; Byadovskaya O. P. – text preparation and editing; Krotova A. O. – text preparation and editing; Sprygin A. V. – text preparation and editing, approval of the final version.

Вклад авторов: Атовуллозода Р. А. – разработка концепции, ресурсное обеспечение, подготовка и редактирование текста, утверждение окончательного варианта; Шумилова И. Н. – подготовка и редактирование текста, утверждение окончательного варианта; Коренной Ф. И. – картографическая визуализация, подготовка и редактирование текста; Амирбеков М. А. – проведение исследований; Назруллозода С. Х. – проведение исследований, разработка методологии, подготовка и редактирование текста; Шарипов Р. М. – проведение исследований; Косимов С. М. – проведение исследований; Бьядовская О. П. – подготовка и редактирование текста; Кротова А. О. – подготовка и редактирование текста; Спрыгин А. В. – подготовка и редактирование текста, утверждение окончательного варианта.

References

1. Kononov A., Prutnikov P., Shumilova I., Kononova S., Nesterov A., Byadovskaya O., et al. Determination of lumpy skin disease virus in bovine meat and offal products following experimental infection. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2019; 66 (3): 1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13158

2. Amirbekov M., Atovullozoda A. R., Kashkulloev M. S. H., Nazrullozoda S. K. H., Andamov I., Amirbek U. M. Epidemiological incidence of lumpy skin disease in Tajikistan. Annals of Clinical and Medical Case Reports. 2024; 13 (18): 1–4. https://acmcasereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ACMCR-v13-2206.pdf

3. Adamu K., Abayneh T., Getachew B., Mohammed H., Deresse G., Zekarias M., et al. Lumpy skin disease virus isolation, experimental infection, and evaluation of disease development in a calf. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14 (1):20460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60994-8

4. Shumilova I., Prutnikov P., Mazloum A., Krotova A., Tenitilov N., Byadov­skay­a O., et al. Subclinical infection caused by a recombinant vaccine-like strain poses high risks of lumpy skin disease virus transmission. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024; 11:1330657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1330657

5. Modethed W., Kreausukon K., Singhla T., Boonsri K., Pringproa K., Sthitmatee N., et al. An evaluation of financial losses due to lumpy skin disease outbreaks in dairy farms of northern Thailand. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025; 11:1501460. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1501460

6. Sprygin A., Pestova Ya., Wallace D. B., Tuppurainen E., Kononov A. V. Transmission of lumpy skin disease virus: a short review. Virus Research. 2019; 269:197637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2019.05.015

7. Ratyotha K., Prakobwong S., Piratae S. Lumpy skin disease: a newly emerging disease in Southeast Asia. Veterinary World. 2022; 15 (12): 2764– 2771. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.2764-2771

8. Annandale C. H., Holm D. E., Ebersohn K., Venter E. H. Seminal transmission of lumpy skin disease virus in heifers. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2014; 61 (5): 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12045

9. Carn V. M., Kitching R. P. An investigation of possible routes of transmission of lumpy skin disease virus (Neethling). Epidemiology and Infection. 1995; 114 (1): 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268800052067

10. Bianchini J., Simons X., Humblet M.-F., Saegerman C. Lumpy skin dise­ase: a systematic review of mode of transmission, risk of emergence and risk entry pathway. Viruses. 2023; 15 (8):1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15081622

11. Shumilova I., Nesterov A., Byadovskaya O., Prutnikov P., Wallace D. B., Mokeeva M., et al. A recombinant vaccine-like strain of lumpy skin disease virus causes low-level infection of cattle through virus-inoculated feed. Pathogens. 2022; 11 (8):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11080920

12. Davies F. G. Lumpy skin disease, an African capripox virus disease of cattle. British Veterinary Journal. 1991; 147 (6): 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(91)90019-j

13. Davies F. G. Observations on the epidemiology of lumpy skin disease in Kenya. Journal of Hygiene. 1982; 88 (1): 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002217240006993x

14. Davies F. G., Krauss H., Lund J., Taylor M. The laboratory diagnosis of lumpy skin disease. Research in Veterinary Science. 1971; 12 (2): 123–127. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4929414

15. Abutarbush S. M., Ababneh M. M., Al Zoubi I. G., Al Sheyab O. M., Al Zoubi M. G., Alekish M. O., Al Gharabat R. J. Lumpy skin disease in Jordan: disease emergence, clinical signs, complications and preliminary-associated economic losses. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2015; 62 (5): 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12177

16. Jabbar M. H., Atif F. A., Kashif M., Ahmed I., Iarussi F., Swelum A. A. Molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic insights of lumpy skin disease in cattle from diverse agro-ecological regions of Punjab, Pakistan. PloS ONE. 2025; 20 (1):e0315532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315532

17. Breman F. C., Haegeman A., Krešić N., Philips W., De Regge N. Lumpy skin disease virus genome sequence analysis: putative spatio-temporal epide­miology, single gene versus whole genome phylogeny and genomic evolution. Viruses. 2023; 15 (7):1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15071471

18. Ul-Rahman A., Shabbir M. Z., Raza M. A., Rossiter P. The expanding host range of lumpy skin disease virus in wild and domestic animals. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2024; 56 (8):269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04154-0

19. WOAH. Animal disease events. https://wahis.woah.org/#/report-management

20. Yeşilbağ K., Toker E. B., Yaşar M., Casal J., Pratelli A. Lumpy skin dise­ ase threat in Europe: current situation, transmission dynamics and future prospects. Research in Veterinary Science. 2026; 202:106061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106061

21. Moudgil G., Chadha J., Khullar L., Chhibber S., Harjai K. Lumpy skin disease: insights into current status and geographical expansion of a transboundary viral disease. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2024; 186:106485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106485

22. Kononov A. V., Sprygin A. V., Kononova S. V., Nesterov A. A., Prutnikov P. V., Artyukhova Ye. Ye., et al. Detection of lumpy skin disease virus genome in field samples collected from cattle in the Russian Federation. Veterinary Science Today. 2018; (1): 29–32. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2018-1-29-32

23. Tran A. T., Tran H. T. T., Truong A. D., Dinh V. T., Dang A. K., Chu N. T., et al. Molecular characterization of lumpy skin disease virus in North Central Vietnam during 2021 and early 2022. Veterinaria Italiana. 2024; 60 (1). https://doi.org/10.12834/vetit.3233.22342.2

24. Smaraki N., Jogi H. R., Kamothi D. J., Savsani H. H. An insight into emergence of lumpy skin disease virus: a threat to Indian cattle. Archives of Microbiology. 2024; 206 (5):210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-024-03932-6

25. Azeem S., Sharma B., Shabir S., Akbar H., Venter E. Lumpy skin disease is expanding its geographic range: a challenge for Asian livestock management and food security. Veterinary Journal. 2022; 279:105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105785

26. Agrawal I., Sharma B., Singh A. P., Varga C. Geospatial analysis of lumpy skin disease outbreaks among cattle in Uttar Pradesh, Indi­a, 2021–2022. Pathogens. 2024; 13 (8):611. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13080611

27. Mulatu E., Feyisa A. Review: lumpy skin disease. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology. 2018; 9 (3):535. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000535

28. Mafirakureva P., Saidi B., Mbanga J. Incidence and molecular chara­ cterisation of lumpy skin disease virus in Zimbabwe using the P32 gene. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2017; 49 (1): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1156-9

29. Pestova Ya. E., Kononov A. V., Sprygin A. V. Entomological aspects of lumpy skin disease epizootology (review). Veterinary Science Today. 2019; (1): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2019-1-28-16-21

30. Tuppurainen E. S., Venter E. H., Coetzer J. A. The detection of lumpy skin disease virus in samples of experimentally infected cattle using diffe­ rent diagnostic techniques. The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research. 2005; 72 (2): 153–164. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v72i2.213

31. Alkhamis M. A., VanderWaal K. Spatial and temporal epidemiology of lumpy skin disease in the Middle East, 2012–2015. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2016; 3:19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00019

32. Vinitchaikul P., Punyapornwithaya V., Seesupa S., Phuykhamsingha S., Arjkumpa O., Sansamur C., Jarassaeng C. The first study on the impact of lumpy skin disease outbreaks on monthly milk production on dairy farms in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Veterinary World. 2023; 16 (4): 687–692. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.687-692


About the Authors

R. A. Atovullozoda
Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Tajikistan

Rajabmurod A. Atovullozoda, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Director

ul. A. Kakharova, 43, Dushanbe 734005



I. N. Shumilova
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Irina N. Shumilova, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher, Reference Laboratory for Bovine Diseases

ul. Gvardeyskaya 6, Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



F. I. Korennoy
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Fedor I. Korennoy, Cand. Sci. (Geography), Senior Researcher, Information and Analysis Centre

ul. Gvardeyskaya 6, Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



M. A. Amirbekov
Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Tajikistan

Mulojon A. Amirbekov, Dr. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher

ul. A. Kakharova, 43, Dushanbe 734005



S. Kh. Nazrullozoda
Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Tajikistan

Sulaimon Kh. Nazrullozoda, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Deputy Director

ul. A. Kakharova, 43, Dushanbe 734005



R. M. Sharipov
Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Tajikistan

Rustam M. Sharipov, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Head of Laboratory of Virology

ul. A. Kakharova, 43, Dushanbe 734005



S. M. Kosimov
Institute of Veterinary Medicine of the Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Tajikistan

Samandar M. Kosimov, Researcher, Laboratory of Virology

ul. A. Kakharova, 43, Dushanbe 734005



O. P. Byadovskaya
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Olga P. Byadovskaya, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Head of Reference Laboratory for Bovine Diseases

ul. Gvardeyskaya 6, Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



A. O. Krotova
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Alena O. Krotova, Leading Biologist, Reference Laboratory for Bovine Diseases

ul. Gvardeyskaya 6, Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



A. V. Sprygin
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Sprygin, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, Reference Laboratory for Bovine Diseases, Head of Molecular and Genetic Research Laboratory

ul. Gvardeyskaya 6, Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



Review

For citations:


Atovullozoda R.A., Shumilova I.N., Korennoy F.I., Amirbekov M.A., Nazrullozoda S.Kh., Sharipov R.M., Kosimov S.M., Byadovskaya O.P., Krotova A.O., Sprygin A.V. Serological tests for lumpy skin disease in Republic of Tajikistan in 2023. Veterinary Science Today. 2026;15(1):60-66. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2026-15-1-60-66

Views: 517

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-196X (Print)
ISSN 2658-6959 (Online)