Development and testing of a set of chromogenic media for rapid diagnosis of bovine mastitis
https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2025-14-2-171-178
Abstract
Introduction. Bovine mastitis remains one of the most prevalent and economically significant diseases in dairy cattle production. Three chromogenic media have been proposed for the diagnosis, each specifically designed for isolation and differentiation of certain mastitis pathogen groups: Medium I is intended for Enterobacteriaceae family bacteria, Medium II – for Staphylococcus genus microorganisms, Medium III – for Streptococcus genus bacteria.
Objective. The objective is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, differentiation capacities and inhibitory properties of these chromogenic media, and to test the media using milk samples from mastitic cows.
Materials and methods. For sensitivity testing, the control strains (Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli) at concentrations of 1×100, 1×101, and 1×102 CFU/mL were used. Microbial growth was assessed following 24-hour incubation at 37 °C. Specificity and differentiation capacities were studied using 22 microbial strains, their growth patterns and colony coloration in chromogenic and control media were compared. Inhibitory properties were determined based on presence/absence of culture growth. The media were evaluated using milk samples from mastitic cows and standardized culturing methods.
Results. The chromogenic media demonstrated sensitivity comparable to the control media (Columbia agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood), p > 0.05. Medium I enabled reliable color-based differentiation but showed limited inhibitory effects. Medium II ensured selective isolation of staphylococci while effectively suppressing growth of other bacteria. Medium III supported growth of both enterococci and streptococci, including Streptococcus agalactiae. The tests conducted in milk samples confirmed genus level differentiation capability.
Conclusion. The developed chromogenic media ensure high-accuracy mastitis diagnosis due to their sensitivity, specificity and differentiation properties. Their implementation makes it possible to cover an extensive range of microorganisms and to selectively isolate the targeted bacterial groups. Further work will be aimed at improving the media for fungal growth suppression and increasing the diagnostic accuracy.
About the Authors
A. V. KapustinRussian Federation
Andrey V. Kapustin, Dr. Sci. (Biology), Associate Professor, First Deputy Director,
24/1, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109428.
A. I. Laishevtsev
Russian Federation
Aleksey I. Laishevtsev, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher, Acting Head, Laboratory for Diagnostics and Control of Antibiotic Resistance of Pathogens of the Most Clinically Significant Infectious Animal Diseases,
24/1, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109428.
V. A. Savinov
Russian Federation
Vasiliy A. Savinov, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, Laboratories of Mycology and Antibiotics named after A. H. Sarkisov,
24/1, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109428.
P. N. Shastin
Russian Federation
Pavel N. Shastin, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Diagnostics and Control of Antibiotic Resistance of Pathogens of the Most Clinically Significant Infectious Animal Diseases,
24/1, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109428.
Kh. Kh. Gilmanov
Russian Federation
Khamid Kh. Gilmanov, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Leukemia,
24/1, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109428.
A. V. Khabarova
Russian Federation
Alla V. Khabarova, Junior Researcher, Laboratory for Diagnostics and Control of Antibiotic Resistance of Pathogens of the Most Clinically Significant Infectious Animal Diseases,
24/1, Ryazansky prospekt, Moscow 109428.
References
1. Zyubin I. N., Smirnov P. N., Naprimerov V. A., Nimatsyrenov G. G. Mastitis in cattle. Novosibirsk: OOO “2D”; 2009. 95 p. (in Russ.)
2. Nikitina M. V., Stolbova O. A., Skosyrskikh L. N. Treatment-and-prophylactic actions at mastitis of cattle. Dairy Farming Journal. 2019; (3): 31–39. https://elibrary.ru/qbdglc (in Russ.)
3. Goulart D. B., Mellata M. Escherichia coli mastitis in dairy cattle: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment challenges. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022; 13:928346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.928346
4. Vakkamäki J., Taponen S., Heikkilä A.-M., Pyörälä S. Bacteriological etiology and treatment of mastitis in Finnish dairy herds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2017; 59:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0301-4
5. Oskolkova M. V., Kuzmina E. V. Etiology of mastitis and its interrelation with gynecologic diseases. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2014; (4): 86–88. https://elibrary.ru/sucqyt (in Russ.)
6. Pascu C., Herman V., Iancu I., Costinar L. Etiology of mastitis and antimicrobial resistance in dairy cattle farms in the western part of Romania. Antibiotics. 2022; 11 (1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11010057
7. Mastitis: etiology, prevention, diagnostic, treatment. Compiled by S. V. Shchepetkina. 2nd ed. supplemented. Saint Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg State Academy of Veterinary Medicine; 2020. 308 p. (in Russ.)
8. Nikitina M. V., Stolbova O. A., Skosyrskikh L. N. Studies on the ethiological factors of cattle mastitis. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2019; (5): 197–200. https://elibrary.ru/vhyltw (in Russ.)
9. Ivanov E. V., Kapustin A. V., Avduevskaya N. N. Study of the vaccination effects against Staphylococcus aureus, causing mastitis and endometritis in cows. Veterinary Science Today. 2024; 13 (4): 360–365. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-4-360-365
10. Ganguly S. Bacteriological examination of cow milk samples collected from case of chronic clinical mastitis. International Journal of Recent Development in Engineering and Technology. 2016; 5 (6): 8–9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303994840
11. Lyusin E. A. Criteria for the selection of antibacterial drugs in the treatment of bovine mastitis. Agrarian Science. 2021; 347 (4): 50–52. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2021-347-4-50-52 (in Russ.)
12. Ganguly S., Wakchaure R. Bacteriological analysis of cow milk sample suspected of being affected with sub-clinical mastitis. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology. 2016; 6 (3): 38–39. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/309389480
13. Hoque M. N., Das Z. C., Rahman A. N. M. A., Haider M. G., Islam M. A. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains in bovine mastitis milk in Bangladesh. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine. 2018; 6 (1): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.03.008
14. Muzyka V. P., Stetsko T. I., Pashkovskaya M. V., Padovsky V. N. Monitoring chuvstvitel’nosti stafilokokkov k antimikrobnym veshchestvam = Monitoring of Staphylococcus susceptibility to antimicrobials. Transactions of the Educational Establishment “Vitebsk the Order of “the Badge of Honor” State Academy of Veterinary Medicine”. 2012; 48 (2-1): 119–122. https://repo.vsavm.by/handle/123456789/600 (in Russ.)
15. Varenikov M. V., Tashlanov V. V., Morozov I. A. Mastitis prophylaxis leads to high profitability of milk production. Dairy and Beef Cattle Farming. 2014; (8): 32–35. https://elibrary.ru/tecawh (in Russ.)
16. Salat O., Lemaire G., Durel L., Perrot F. Etiology of severe mastitis in French dairy herds. PLoS ONE. 2023; 18 (12):e0295614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295614
17. Ali T., Kamran, Raziq A., Wazir I., Ullah R., Shah P., et al. Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates from cattle and buffaloes in northwest of Pakistan. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021; 8:746755. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.746755
18. Tommasoni C., Fiore E., Lisuzzo A., Gianesella M. Mastitis in dairy cattle: on-farm diagnostics and future perspectives. Animals. 2023; 13 (15):2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152538
19. Abd El-Tawab A. A., Nabih A. M., Saad W. Bacteriological and molecular diagnosis of most common bacteria causing subclinical mastitis in cow. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal. 2019; 37 (2): 28–32. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/343114382
20. Kahya Demirbilek S., Yıldız M., Akkoç A., Mutlu A. M., Ardıçlı Ö., Aner H. Comparison of bacteriological culture method and multiplex real- time PCR for detection of mastitis. Research in Veterinary Science. 2024; 172:105237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105237
21. Adkins P. R. F., Middleton J. R. Methods for diagnosing mastitis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 2018; 34 (3): 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.07.003
22. Chelnokova M. I., Shcherbakova N. A. Cow mastitis diagnostics and treatment. Proceedings of the State Agricultural Academy of Velikie Luki. 2018; (1): 20–24. https://elibrary.ru/uqrcaa (in Russ.)
23. Chernenok V. V., Hotmirova O. V., Chernenok Yu. N. Methods of diagnostics and treatment of mastitis in cows. Vestnik Kurskoj gosudarstvennoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj akademii. 2020; (4): 40–43. https://elibrary.ru/ygwehu (in Russ.)
24. Shleinikova A. A., Skubko O. R. Diagnosis of mastitis in cattle. Nauchno-innovatsionnoe razvitie veterinarnoi nauki i praktiki: materialy Natsional’noi (Vserossiiskoi) nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii (Omsk, 10 noyabrya 2022 g.) = Scientific and Innovative Development of Veterinary Science and Practice: proceedings of the National (AllRussian) ScientificPractical Conference (Omsk, November 10, 2022). Omsk: Omsk State Agrarian University; 2022; 77–80. https://www.elibrary.ru/gmiyot (in Russ.)
25. Ganguly S., Para P. A., Praveen P. K. Bacteriological examination of cow milk samples suspected of clinical mastitis: a case study. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience. 2017; 5 (1): 207–209. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2518
26. Ladanova M. A. Mastitis in cattle. Aktual’nye voprosy veterinarnoi meditsiny: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 100letiyu kafedr klinicheskoi diagnostiki, vnutrennikh boleznei zhivotnykh im. Sineva A. V., akusherstva i operativnoi khirurgii (Sankt Peterburg, 29–30 sentyabrya 2022 g.) = Current issues in veterinary medicine: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Departments of Clinical Diagnosis, Animal Internal Disea ses named after A. V. Sinev, Obstetrics and Operative Surgery (Saint Petersburg, September 29–30, 2022). Saint Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg State University of Veterinary Medicine; 2022; 75–79. https://doi.org/10.52419/3006-2022-5 (in Russ.)
27. Ganguly S., Padhy A., Sahoo S., Garg Sh. L., Praveen P. K., Wakchaure R. Bacteriological examination and antibiogram of milk sample of clinically infected dairy cow suffering from mastitis. International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Tropical Diseases. 2015; 1 (1): 6–7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290427340
28. Jangulova A. N., Kukhar Ye. V., Akanova Zh. Zh., Kurmanov B. A. Application of compact dry tests in the field. Fundamental’nye i prikladnye nauchnye issledovaniya: aktual’nye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii: sbornik statei XLVII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Penza, 30 iyulya 2021 g.) = Fundamental and applied scientific research: currentissues, achievements and innovations: collection of papers of the XLVII International Scientific and Practical Conference (Penza, July 30, 2021). Penza: International Centerfor Scientific Cooperation “Science and Enlightenment”; 2021; 63–70. https://elibrary.ru/unssnp (in Russ.)
29. Galkin A. V., Solovyeva O. I., Kalashnikova G. T., Elagina A. A. Diagnostika vozbuditelei mastita u korov s pomoshch’yu podlozhek RIDA® COUNT = Diagnosis of mastitis pathogens using RIDA® COUNT plates. Molochnaya reka. 2012; (4): 44–45. https://elibrary.ru/egtmiu (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kapustin A.V., Laishevtsev A.I., Savinov V.A., Shastin P.N., Gilmanov Kh.Kh., Khabarova A.V. Development and testing of a set of chromogenic media for rapid diagnosis of bovine mastitis. Veterinary Science Today. 2025;14(2):171-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2025-14-2-171-178