Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019

Laboratory diagnosis is a crucial component in implementation of the set of anti-epidemic measures aimed at contagious animal disease control. The need for unswerving trust in the quality of laboratory performance is a matter of importance not only for service providers and customers, but also for inspecting organiza­tions, accreditation bodies, etc. that establish performance requirements for diagnostic laboratories. Incorrect laboratory test results can lead to a misdiagnosis and, therefore, to grave consequences. One of the forms of experimental verification of a laboratory’s performance with a view to determine the laboratory’s competence and to verify its compliance with accreditation criteria as part of inspection control of the laboratory’s activities is interlaboratory comparison. The laboratory can prove its competence at a particular time, as well as clearly demonstrate how stable the quality of its test results is by summarizing and analyzing the results of its participation in interlaboratory comparisons. The analysis of the results of the interlaboratory comparisons (programmes for detection of causative agents or antibodies to the causative agents of avian influenza, Newcastle disease, rabies, classical swine fever, African swine fever, bluetongue, lumpy skin disease) organized by the FGBI “ARRIAH” for the veterinary laboratories of the Russian Federation in 2018–2019 is presented. The results showed that most of the laboratories had passed the tests successfully. The results submitted by participants were unsatisfactory in some interlaboratory comparison programmes (rabies virus detection using fluorescent antibody technique; detection of avian influenza, classical swine fever and lumpy skin disease viruses using polymerase chain reaction). That highlights the need for those participants who failed the tests to improve their laboratory testing quality.

1. GOST ISO/IEC 17043-2013. Conformity assessment. General requirements for proficiency testing. М.: Standartinform; 2014. 34. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200108187. (in Russian)

2. Decision of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission No. 12 dated January 26, 2016 on approval of the Procedure for organization of interlaboratory comparison tests (interlaboratory comparisons). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420333646. (in Russian)

3. GOST ISO/IEC 17025-2009 (ISO/IEC 17025-2005). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. М.: Standartinform; 2012. 28. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-iso-mek-17025-2009. (in Russian)

4. Order of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of the Russian Federation No. 326 dated May 30, 2014 on approval of Criteria for accreditation, the list of documents confirming the compliance of the applicant, accredited person with accreditation criteria and the list of documents in the field of standardization, the requirements of which shall be observed by applicants, accredited persons to ensure their compliance with accreditation criteria (as amended on August 19, 2019). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420203443. (in Russian)

5. Kartashova А. V., Khalikov М. R. Interlaboratory comparisons as criterion for accreditation. Kontrol’ kachestva produkcii. 2015; 1: 27–30. (in Russian)