ANTHRAX GLOBAL EPIZOOTOLOGY. 1. SUSCEPTIBLE ANIMALS
https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2018-4-27-49-52
Abstract
Anthrax is a widespread disease. Epizootic outbreaks are constantly registered worldwide. Obligatory lethality of the disease, the causative agent of which leads a parasitic mode of life, makes it possible to consider mortality as the main sign of anthrax epizootic process in animals. The paper describes susceptibility of animals to anthrax under natural conditions. The paper presents literature data on the participation of animals of different species and groups in the epizootic process, and the author’s own results of analysis of the recent situation. The susceptibility of animal species to anthrax depends not only on the dose, but also on the form (vegetative or spore) of the anthrax bacterium, the mode of infection, and the site of introduction of the pathogen into the organism. Anthrax affects mammals of 19 species: mostly cattle, which are intermediate hosts and hosts in the global parasitoid system; sheep and goats, horses, pigs, many species of wild ruminants and herbivorous, mostly deer, gazelles, bisons, hippopotamuses and even elephants, as well as Carnivora. Herbivorous endemic animals play the main role in maintenance of natural (soil) foci of anthrax and provide infectious cycles and regular recontamination of the soil – the only reservoir of infection. Such multipathogenicity demonstrates the predominant host range of local parasitoid systems – cattle and small ruminants in the areas of pasture, distant-pasture, free-range cattle rearing (Africa, Asia, Australia), wild herbivores in Africa and the south of the USA, bisons in Canada, deer in the north of the Russian Federation. Infection of Equidae and particularly predators has a sporadic, dead-end character. It occurs relatively seldom and does not play any signifcant role in anthrax epizootology and epidemiology.
About the Authors
Makhamat Nguerabe YamtitinaRussian Federation
Post-Graduate Student
Moscow
V. V. Makarov
Russian Federation
Doctor of Science (Biology), professor
Moscow
References
1. Veterinary rules for the implementation of preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, restrictive and other measures, the imposition and lifting of quarantine and other restrictions aimed at preventing the spread and elimination of anthrax foci [Veterinarnye pravila osushchestvleniya proflakticheskih, diagnosticheskih, lechebnyh, ogranichitel’nyh i inyh meropriyatij, ustanovleniya i otmeny karantina i inyh ogranichenij, napravlennyh na predotvrashchenie rasprostraneniya i likvidaciyu ochagov sibirskoj yazvy]: approved by Order of the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia No. 403 of August 14, 2017 (in Russian).
2. Makarov V. V., Briko N. I. The worldwide nosoarea of anthrax [Mirovoj nozoareal sibirskoj yazvy]. Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. Current Items. 2011; 2: 13–18 (in Russian).
3. Anthrax: actual problems of the development and implementation of medical protective products: a guide for doctors [Sibirskaya yazva: aktual’nye problemy razrabotki i vnedreniya medicinskih sredstv zashchity: rukovodstvo dlya vrachej]. ed. G. G. Onischenko, V. V. Kozhukhova. M.: Medicine; 2010 (in Russian).
4. Anthrax in the North Caucasus [Sibirskaya yazva na Severnom Kavkaze]. А. N. Kulichenko, N. P. Buravtseva, А. G. Ryazanova, Ye. I. Yeryomenko; ed. professor А. N. Kulichenko. Maikop: Kachestvo, 2016 (in Russian).
5. Shestakova I.V. Anthrax does not forgive mistakes: the information assessment following the Yamal Peninsula outbreak in the summer of 2016 [Sibirskaya yazva oshibok ne proshchaet: ocenka informacii posle vspyshki na Yamale letom 2016 goda]. Jurnal Infektologii. 2016; 8 (3): 5–27 (in Russian).
6. Anthrax in humans and animals. WHO. 4th ed. Geneva, 2008. URL: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/97503/9789241547536_eng.pdf (access date: 01.12.18).
7. Anthrax outbreaks: A warning for improved prevention, control and heightened awareness. S. Shadomy, A. El Idrissi, E. Raizman [et al.]. Empres Watch. 2016; 37. URL: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6124e.pdf (access date: 01.12.18).
8. Anthrax. OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (mammals, birds and bees). 5th ed. Paris: OIE, 2004; 1 (Chap. 2.2.1.): 283– 294. URL: http://www.oie.int/doc/ged/D6460.PDF (access date: 01.12.18).
9. Guidelines for the Surveillance and Control of Anthrax in Human and Animals. WHO/EMC/ZDI/98.6. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1998. URL: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/anthrax/WHO_EMC_ZDI_98_6/en/ (access date: 01.12.18).
10. Hugh-Jones M., Blackburn J. The ecology of Bacillus anthracis. Mol. Aspects Med. 2009; 30(6): 356–367; DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2009.08.003.
11. Hugh-Jones M., De Vos V. Anthrax and wildlife. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE. 2002; 21 (2): 359–383.
12. ProMed. International Society for Infectious Diseases. URL: http://www.promedmail.org/.
Review
For citations:
Yamtitina M.N., Makarov V.V. ANTHRAX GLOBAL EPIZOOTOLOGY. 1. SUSCEPTIBLE ANIMALS. Veterinary Science Today. 2018;(4):49-52. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2018-4-27-49-52