Preview

Veterinary Science Today

Advanced search

Study of microbial species composition in the production environment of livestock facilities

https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2025-14-4-426-432

Abstract

Introduction. Livestock facilities serve as a reservoir for microorganisms of various families and genera, including both opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms. Continuous microbiological monitoring of the production environment in livestock facilities, along with the detection and identification of microorganisms, allow for the microflora control in these facilities, thereby preventing the risks of infectious diseases and ensuring timely implementation of appropriate veterinary, sanitary, and zoohygienic measures.

Objective. Study of microbial species composition in the production environment of livestock facilities including contamination level and classification  of the isolated mircoorganisms by families and disinfectant-resistant groups.

Materials and methods. Swabs from the surfaces in the production facilities for cattle (namely, dairy cow facility, calf facility, calving area, and milking hall) on the cattle farm located in the Omsk Oblast were taken for study of microbial species composition. The microorganisms were classified using ММТ Е24 и ММТ S multi-biochemical microtests and selective nutrient medium.

Results. Tests showed that the microflora circulating in cattle facilities included both pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms of the following species: Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Klebsiella aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Hafnia alvei, Klebsiella ozaenae, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus simulans, Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus lentus.

Conclusion. The recovered microorganisms belonged to the families Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillaceae and Staphylococcaceae and to the following disinfectant-resistant groups: low-resistant, moderately-resistant and highly-resistant. The highest microbial load was detected on floor, walls and stall dividers in the facility for dairy cows and in milking hall, the detected microorganisms demonstrated high species diversity. The lowest microbial load was detected in calving area and calf facility. 

About the Authors

Artem N. Novikov
Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Artem N. Novikov, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Specific Prevention of Brucellosis, Department of Veterinary Medicine, 

prospekt Koroleva, 26, Omsk 644012.



Pavel V. Arzhakov
Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Pavel V. Arzhakov, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher, Diagnostic Research and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Medicine,

prospekt Koroleva, 26, Omsk 644012.



Tatiana S. Dudoladova
Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Tatiana S. Dudoladova, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher, Diagnostic Research and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Medicine,

prospekt Koroleva, 26, Omsk 644012.



Evgeny A. Kosobokov
Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Evgeny A. Kosobokov, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Senior Researcher, Diagnostic Research and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Medicine,

prospekt Koroleva, 26, Omsk 644012.



References

1. O Donovan S. M., McAloon C. G., O’Grady L., Geraghty T., Burrell A., McCarthy M.-C., et al. Use of conjoint analysis to weight biosecurity practices on pasture-based dairy farms to develop a novel audit tool – BioscoreDairy. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024; 11:1462783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1462783

2. Gelalcha B. D., Gelgie A. E., Kerro Dego O. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of extended- spectrum beta-lactamase- producing Escherichia coli in East Tennessee dairy farms. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2023; 10:1260433. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1260433

3. Liu K., Zhang Y., Yu Z., Xu Q., Zheng N., Zhao S., et al. Ruminal microbiota- host interaction and its effect on nutrient metabolism. Animal Nutrition. 2021; 7 (1): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.12.001

4. Antonevsky I. V., Pleshakova V. I., Leshcheva N. A. Biofilm-forming microflora in the structure of microorganisms isolated from farm and domestic animals. Scientific notes Kazan Bauman State Academy of Veterinary Medicine. 2025; 261 (1): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.31588/2413_4201_1883_1_261_16 (in Russ.)

5. Fisinin V. I., Trukhachev V. I., Saleeva I. P., Morozov V. Yu., Zhuravchuk E. V., Kolesnikov R. O., Ivanov A. V. Microbiological risks related to the industrial poultry and animal production. Agricultural Biology. 2018; 53 (6): 1120–1130. https://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2018.6.1120eng

6. Donnik I. M., Isaeva A. G., Musikhina N. B., Moiseeva K. V., Gordeev A. A., Krivonogova A. S. Structure of opportunistic pathogenic microflora in various kinds of animal farms. Veterinaria Kubani. 2019; (5): 18–21. https://doi.org/10.33861/2071-8020-2019-5-18-21 (in Russ.)

7. Morozov V. Yu., Sytnik D. A., Agarkov A. V. Сontaminations sources of air closed pomeshcheniy specific structure of microflora. Agricultural Bulletin of Stavropol Region. 2016; (1): 73–76. https://elibrary.ru/vscvmf (in Russ.)

8. Kamenskaya T. N., Lukyanchik S. A., Krivenok L. L. Microbial contamination of space in the complex for fattening cattle and their aerosol sanation in the presence of calves. Ecology and Animal World. 2017; (2): 35–39. (in Russ.)

9. Galiullin A. K., Sofronov V. G., Danilova N. I., Sofronov P. V., Magdeeva E. A., Zaitsev A. V., Kuznetsova E. L. Microbiological analysis of livestock premises with bedding materials. Scientific notes of the Kazan Bauman State Academy of Veterinary Medicine. 2022; 251 (3): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.31588/2413_4201_1883_3_251_77 (in Russ.)

10. Plotnikov I. V., Glazunova L. A. The effect of disinfection on the quantitative and qualitative composition of the microflora of livestock buildings. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2020; (1): 40–42. https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2020-1-10 (in Russ.)

11. Muzyka A. А., Sheigratsova L. N., Kurak A. S., Kirikovich S. N., Shmatko N. N., Puchkа M. P., et al. Otsenka kachestva vozdushnoi sredy zhivotnovodcheskikh pomeshchenii v zavisimosti ot zon i tochek razmeshcheniya zhivotnykh = Evaluation of indoor air quality in livestock facilities based on animal housing zones and locations. Aktual’nye problemy intensivnogo razvitiya zhivotnovodstva. 2021; 24 (2): 201–211. https://elibrary.ru/chgzvm (in Russ.)

12. Ibragimov A. G. Ecological problems of agriculture. Agrarian Science. 2019; (4): 73–75. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2019-324-4-73-75 (in Russ.)

13. Curtis G., McGregor Argo C., Jones D., Grove- White D. The impact of early life nutrition and housing on growth and reproduction in dairy cattle. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 (2): e0191687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191687

14. Liu H., Meng L., Dong L., Zhang Y., Wang J., Zheng N. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from raw milk in dairy herds in Northern China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021; 12:730656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.730656

15. Krivenok L. L. The study of microbial contamination in the premises for keeping cattle. Ecology and Animal World. 2024; (2): 38–43. https://elibrary.ru/jvdhyb (in Russ.)

16. Glazunova L. A., Plotnikov I. V., Glazunov Yu. V. Peculiarities of microbiocenoses in livestock premises in the Tyumen Region. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University. 2019; (3): 227–230. https://elibrary.ru/jqhgsn (in Russ.)

17. Avduevskaya N. N. Staphylococcus aureus is one of the main pathogens of mastitis of lactating cows. Russian Journal „Problems of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology”. 2020; (2): 245–249. https://elibrary.ru/jymdom (in Russ.)

18. Zhang X., Ma Z., Hao P., Ji S., Gao Y. Characteristics and health impacts of bioaerosols in animal barns: A comprehensive study. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2024; 278:116381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116381

19. Patterson L., Navarro-Gonzalez N., Jay-Russell M. T., Aminabadi P., Pires A. F. A. Risk factors of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in livestock raised on diversified small-scale farms in California. Epidemiology and Infection. 2022; 150: e125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268822001005

20. Wang Y., Zhang P., Wu J., Chen S., Jin Y., Long J., et al. Transmission of livestock- associated methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus between animals, environment, and humans in the farm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023; 30 (37): 86521–86539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28532-7

21. Kononenko A. B., Bannikova D. A., Britova S. V., Savinova E. P., Nabiullina D. N. Monitoring the stability of opportunistic and pathogenic Enterobacteria to disinfectants. Russian Journal „Problems of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology”. 2016; (4): 22–29. https://elibrary.ru/xgsycl (in Russ.)

22. Ouyang H., Wang L., Sapkota D., Yang M., Morán J., Li L., et al. Control technologies to prevent aerosol- based disease transmission in animal agriculture production settings: a review of established and emerging approaches. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2023; 10:1291312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1291312

23. Lenchenko E. M., Abdullayeva A. M., Pokrovsky A. A. Indication of microorganisms biofilms in monitoring the biosafety of food raw materials and the environment. Russian Journal „Problems of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology”. 2024; (2): 233–238. https://elibrary.ru/xtivuv (in Russ.)

24. Antonevskiy I. V., Pleshakova V. I. Structural and functional features of bacterial biofilms in farm animals and livestock infrastructure. Vestnik of Omsk SAU. 2023; (1): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.48136/2222-0364_2023_1_74 (in Russ.)

25. Antonevsky I. V., Pleshakova V. I., Lokteva A. S., Leshcheva N. A. Species composition and antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolates isolated from animals of the Omsk Region. Bulletin of KrasSAU. 2023; (6): 97–103. https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2023-6-97-103 (in Russ.)

26. Lenchenko E. M., Stepanov D. V., Blumenkrants D. A. Research of the influence of antibacterial and fungicidal preparations on formation biofilm of microorganisms. Russian Journal „Problems of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology”. 2021; (4): 448–458. https://elibrary.ru/bsthpm (in Russ.)

27. Smirnova L. I., Zabrovskaia A. V., Makarov A. V. Diagnostics of associated coliform mastitis of cows in industrial complex conditions. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2024; (3): 20–27. https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2024.3.20 (in Russ.)

28. Zabrovskaia A. V. Pathogenic Escherichia coli: virulence factors, spread, diagnostic problems. International Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2023; (4): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.52419/issn2072-2419.2023.4.87 (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Novikov A.N., Arzhakov P.V., Dudoladova T.S., Kosobokov E.A. Study of microbial species composition in the production environment of livestock facilities. Veterinary Science Today. 2025;14(4):426-432. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2025-14-4-426-432

Views: 36


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-196X (Print)
ISSN 2658-6959 (Online)