FMD under сontrol: enhanced FMD surveillance in the Russian Federation results in the WOAH Official Recognition of Zone Western Siberia – Urals as FMD-free

Introduction. Foot-and-mouth disease is one of the key threats to global animal welfare and international economic relations. Like any other transboundary animal disease, it shall be notified to the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) in accordance with the relevant international standards. By 2016, the largest part of the territory of the Russian Federation (i. e. 50 subjects and 2 federal cities) had been recognized by the WOAH as an FMD-free zone without vaccination. From 2021 to 2023, 4 more zones of the country were granted the status of freedom from foot-and-mouth disease with vaccination. At the end of 2024, only 10 subjects of the Russian Federation, all located within zone Western Siberia – Urals, lacked official recognition.

Objective. Descriptive analysis of the animal health situation in the Russian Federation from 2021 to 2024: substantiating success of the Rosselkhoznadzor’s systematic approach to regionalization in accordance with the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code.

Materials and methods. Various information sources were used to collect and analyze materials on the animal health situation in Russia, including the USSR archives, veterinary reports, and the WOAH statistics.

Results. FMD situation was analyzed in 10 subjects of the Russian Federation bordering on the Republic of Kazakhstan, with an emphasis on FMD control measures, regionalization and zoning. This section focuses on distribution of statuses across Russia’s administrative subjects and the historical records on the disease outbreaks. It also outlines regulatory and surveillance measures implemented by the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (the Rosselkhoznadzor) to manage the FMD status in various regions, taking into account the prophylactic measures implemented in place. The paper describes these measures and their results step-by-step, showing a dynamic improvement of the FMD surveillance system.

Conclusion. On 29 May 2025, at the 92^nd WOAH General Session of the World Assembly of Delegates, Zone Western Siberia – Urals was officially recognized as a foot and-mouth disease-free zone with vaccination. This decision completes the process of structuring the territory of the Russian Federation into 6 zones. The WOAH-granted disease-freedom statuses confirm efficacy of the preventive and surveillance measures, which is crucial to ensure global epizootic stability. These accomplishments result from the efforts jointly taken by the Rosselkhoznadzor and its subordinate institution the Federal Centre for Animal Health.

1. Federal Center for Development of Agricultural Exports under the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation (Agroexport). Statistics. Export of the agro-industrial complex of the Russian Federation in 2021. https://aemcx.ru/services-and-statistics/statistics/stat2021 (in Russ.)

2. Federal Customs Service. Reference and analytical materials. Customs statistics on the foreign trade of the Russian Federation, broken down by commodities, countries, and time periods. https://customs.gov.ru/statistic (in Russ.)

3. Singh C. P., Verma A. K., Pal B. C. Prevalence of protected animals against foot and mouth disease in Uttar Pradesh. The Haryana Veterinarian. 2008; 47: 107–109. https://www.luvas.edu.in/haryana-veterinarian/archive-2008. php?AM4

4. Singh R., Pandey A. B., Chandra D. K., Singh K. P., Mehrotra M. L. Epidemiology of malignant form of foot-and-mouth disease in susceptible cattle and buffalo population of Punjab and Uttar Pradesh. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2008; 78 (1): 3–7. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/3315

5. Wang J., Chen J., Zhang S., Ding Y., Wang M., Zhang H., et al. Risk assessment and integrated surveillance of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Russia based on Monte Carlo simulation. BMC Veterinary Research. 2021; 17:268. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02967-x

6. Burova O. A., Zakharova O. I., Iashin I. V., Khaibrakhmanova S. Sh., Zhuchkova O. V., Grebnev N. A., Blokhin A. A. Foot and mouth disease: risk factors and control measures (review). Agricultural Science Euro-North -East . 2023; 24 (3): 346–358. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072–9081.2023.24.3.346–358 (in Russ.)

7. The control of economically significant animal diseases. Agrarian Science. 2020; (7–8): 12–13. https://elibrary.ru/enbxuf (in Russ.)

8. Jamal S. M., Belsham G. J. Foot-and-mouth disease: past, present and future. Veterinary Research. 2013; 44:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-44-116

9. Rahman A. U., Dhama K., Ali Q., Raza M. A., Chaudhry U., Shabbir M. Z. Foot and mouth disease in a wide range of wild hosts: a potential constraint in disease control efforts worldwide particularly in disease- endemic settings. Acta Tropica. 2020; 210:105567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105567

10. Fukai K., Kawaguchi R., Nishi T., Ikezawa M., Yamada M., Seeyo K. B., Morioka K. Risk of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease by wild animals: infection dynamics in Japanese wild boar following direct inoculation or contact exposure. Veterinary Research. 2022; 53:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01106-0

11. Nikiforov V. V., Mayorova T. K., Karaulov A. K., Spiridonov A. N., Savvin A. V. Susceptibility to foot and mouth disease and role of wild animals. Veterinary Science Today. 2014; (1): 35–40. https://elibrary.ru/tzlmpr

12. Bolortsetseg S., Enkhtuvshin S., Nyamsuren D., Weisman W., Fine A., Yang A., Joly D. O. Serosurveillance for foot-and-mouth disease in Mongolian gazelles (Procapra gutturosa) and livestock on the Eastern Steppe of Mongolia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2012; 48 (1): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-48.1.33

13. World Organisation for Animal Health. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. https://sont.woah.org/portal/tool/?tab=0&panel=content-navigation&le=en

14. The Spread of Pathogens through International Trade. OIE Scientific and Technical Review. Ed. by S. C. MacDiarmid. 2011; 30 (1): 1–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.issue.30.1.46

15. Chen R. T., Orenstein W. A. Epidemiologic methods in immunization programs. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1996; 18 (2): 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017931

16. The Progressive Control Pathway for FMD control (PCP-FMD). Principles, Stage Descriptions and Standards. 2012. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/eufmd/docs/PCP/PCP_en.pdf

17. Sumption K., Domenech J., Ferrari G. Progressive control of FMD on a global scale. Veterinary Record. 2012; 170 (25): 637–639. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.e4180

18. The Global Foot and Mouth Disease Control Strategy. Strengthening animal health systems through improved control of major diseases. 2012. https://www.fao.org/4/an390e/an390e.pdf

19. Nikiforov V. V., Noskov S. A., Sprygin A. V., Alhussen M. A., Krylova A. S., Erofeeva T. V., et al. The presence of two distinct lineages of the foot-and-mouth disease virus type A in Russia in 2013–2014 has significant implications for the epidemiology of the virus in the region. Viruses. 2025; 17 (1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17010008

20. Nikiforov V., Shcherbakov A., Chvala I., Kremenchugskaya S., Korennoy F., Mayorova T., et al. Insights into the molecular epidemiology of footand-mouth disease virus in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia in terms of O/ME-SA/Ind-2001e sublineage expansion. Viruses. 2023; 15 (3):598. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030598

21. Yakovleva A. S., Scherbakov А. V. Detection of antibodies to non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus (review). Veterinary Science Today. 2023; 12 (3): 190–196. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2023-12-3-190-196