Scroll to:
Overview of animal infectious disease situation in the Republic of Dagestan in 2023
https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-3-255-260
Abstract
An epizootiological survey of livestock farms of Dagestan was conducted, the main infectious diseases common in the region were considered, and measures taken to protect against them were described. At present, the Veterinary Service is undertaking systematic efforts to prevent the occurrence and spread of infectious diseases such as brucellosis, leukosis, rabies, pasteurellosis, blackleg, bradsot and enterotoxemia in the Republic. Among the above-mentioned diseases reported in 2023, brucellosis and leukosis are responsible for the vast majority of outbreaks and diseased animals detected in them. In particular, the following diseases have the largest share in the nosological profile of quarantinable infectious diseases based on the number of detected infected localities during the period under study: brucellosis (52.63%), bovine leukosis (30.70%), rabies (8.77%), enterotoxemia (3.51%), pasteurellosis (1.75%), bradsot (1.75%) and blackleg (0.88%). In total, 1,812 animals were affected with quarantinable infections and 35 animals died in 114 infected localities. Most often over the past year, quarantinable infections were reported in cattle (69.59% of cases) and small ruminants (29.36%); in 1.05% of cases, the diseases affected horses, cats, wild animals and birds. In order to maintain animal disease freedom and sustainable growth of livestock production, the Veterinary Committee of the Republic of Dagestan annually implements measures to prevent the occurrence and spread of 75 diseases of animals and birds, including 10 highly dangerous ones. Anti-epizootic measures taken in the past year included a total of 93.8 million vaccinations and 6.2 million tests performed in the diagnostic institutions. Plans for the prevention of highly dangerous and other contagious diseases of animals and birds were fully implemented.
Keywords
For citations:
Mikailov M.M., Budulov N.R., Gunashev Sh.A., Yanikova E.A. Overview of animal infectious disease situation in the Republic of Dagestan in 2023. Veterinary Science Today. 2024;13(3):255-260. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-3-255-260
INTRODUCTION
Studying an epizootic process plays a major role in the development of effective anti-epizootic measures for infectious disease control. A set of measures aimed at the eradication of infection outbreaks and the prevention of pathogen introduction into disease free farms should take into account the specificities of krais and regions [1][2].
Maintaining sustainable freedom of the country’s livestock from quarantinable infectious diseases is the most important task of veterinary science and practice, it is crucial in protecting the health and life of humans and animals, in providing the population with ecologically safe food products and industry with high-quality raw materials [3-5].
Therefore, anti-epizootic measures should be developed taking into account the knowledge of the animal disease situation based on the analysis of long-term data on epizootic process development for each infectious disease in a particular area. An effective solution to this problem requires appropriate information support, the establishment and implementation of an epizootological monitoring system [6-11].
Disease freedom of a particular animal population is achieved through the implementation of a set of special, general and organizational measures aimed at the effective control of the epizootic process, the main condition of which is the commitment to achieve biological equilibrium in any parasitic systems in all cases at the territorial and population levels [12][13].
Dagestan Republic is one of the largest regions in the North Caucasus. Its total area is 50.3 thousand square kilometres. It occupies the northeastern slopes of the Main Caucasian Ridge and the southwestern part of the Caspian Depression. The territory of the Republic is divided into four main physico-geographical zones: flatland, foothill, mountain and highland, based on which the zonal classification of municipal areas and urban districts was approved by a Decree of the Government of Dagestan Republic1.
Animal husbandry occupies a leading place in the agriculture of Dagestan Republic and is represented by the following sectors of great importance: cattle, sheep, pig, horse, poultry farming, beekeeping, pond fish farming and others. The most essential conditions for their successful development are the prevention and eradication of quarantinable infectious diseases, which cause significant economic damage resulting from animal deaths, reduced performance and product quality, as well as the costs of basic organizational-economic, veterinary-sanitary and anti-epizootic measures. In the light of the above, studying the animal and bird infectious disease situation in Dagestan Republic is currently important and serves as the basis for the improvement of regional programmes aimed at animal contagious disease eradication.
The aim of the study is to monitor and assess the quarantinable animal and bird infectious disease situation in Dagestan Republic in 2023.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The examination and analysis of statistical reports were carried out at the Laboratory of Infectious Pathology of Caspian Zonal Research Veterinary Institute – Branch of the Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of Dagestan Republic and in the administrative districts.
The quarantinable animal infectious disease situation was examined by analyzing data from the veterinary reports of the Veterinary Committee of Dagestan Republic, the republican, inter-raion and raion veterinary laboratories, the municipal and raion veterinary departments.
The epizootological survey of livestock establishments located in different physical and climatic zones and of individual settlements and farms was carried out in accordance with “Methodical guidelines for epizootological study”2 and “Recommendations on epizootological study methods”3.
The data were statistically processed and analysed using generally accepted methods [14].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The priority areas of the activities of the State Veterinary Service are maintaining the animal disease freedom of the region, ensuring the production of veterinary-safe animal products and protecting people from diseases shared between humans and animals.
The data on the animal and bird infectious disease situation in Dagestan Republic for the period under study are presented in Table 1.
It was found that a total of 114 quarantinable animal infectious disease infected localities were reported in the region in 2023, of which 60 were for brucellosis in cattle and small ruminants, 35 for bovine leukosis, 10 for rabies in domestic and wild animals, 4 for enterotoxemia in sheep, 2 for pasteurellosis, 2 for bradsot and 1 for blackleg.
The following diseases have the largest share in the nosological profile of quarantinable infectious diseases (Fig.) based on the number of detected infected localities during the period under study: brucellosis (52.63%), bovine leukosis (30.70%), rabies (8.77%), enterotoxemia (3.51%), pasteurellosis (1.75%), bradsot (1.75%) and blackleg (0.88%). In total, 1,812 animals became diseased in 114 localities infected with quarantinable infections.
Over the past year, quarantinable infections were most often reported in cattle (in 69.59% of cases) and small ruminants (29.36%); in 1.05% of cases, the diseases affected horses, cats, wild animals and birds (Table 2).
Table 1
Data on animal and bird contagious diseases reported in Dagestan Republic in 2023
Disease |
Species |
During the reporting period |
Ongoing as of the end |
||||
number |
outbreaks |
total number of infected localities |
total number |
||||
number of detected outbreaks |
number of diseased animals/birds |
number of dead animals/birds |
|||||
Brucellosis |
cattle |
48 |
117 |
1,236 |
– |
71 |
252 |
small ruminants |
12 |
13 |
500 |
– |
9 |
10 |
|
horses |
– |
– |
1 |
– |
– |
– |
|
Leukosis |
cattle |
35 |
110 |
18 |
– |
96 |
214 |
Rabies |
cattle |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
– |
– |
cats |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
– |
– |
|
wild animals |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
– |
– |
|
Pasteurellosis |
cattle |
– |
2 |
2 |
2 |
– |
1 |
small ruminants |
2 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
– |
– |
|
Blackleg |
cattle |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Bradsot |
small ruminants |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
– |
– |
Enterotoxemia |
small ruminants |
4 |
4 |
7 |
7 |
– |
– |
Dysentery |
small ruminants |
– |
– |
1 |
1 |
– |
– |
Epididymitis |
small ruminants |
– |
– |
15 |
– |
6 |
6 |
Dourine |
horses |
– |
5 |
7 |
– |
– |
5 |
Avian influenza |
birds |
– |
1 |
5 |
5 |
– |
– |
Total |
– |
114 |
269 |
1,812 |
35 |
183 |
489 |
Fig. Nosological profile of quarantinable infectious diseases in Dagestan Republic in 2023
Table 2
Quarantinable infection occurrence in animals and number of infected localities in Dagestan Republic in 2023
Species |
Infected localities |
Diseased animals/birds |
||
abs. number |
% |
abs. number |
% |
|
Cattle |
88 |
77.19 |
1,261 |
69.59 |
Small ruminants |
20 |
17.54 |
532 |
29.36 |
Horses |
– |
– |
8 |
0.44 |
Cats |
3 |
2.63 |
3 |
0.17 |
Wild animals |
3 |
2.63 |
3 |
0.17 |
Birds |
– |
– |
5 |
0.28 |
Total |
114 |
1,812 |
During the monitoring period, 35 animals died of infectious diseases in Dagestan Republic; in particular, 28.57% of domestic and wild animals died of rabies, 20.0% of cattle and small ruminants died of pasteurellosis, 20.0% of sheep died of enterotoxemia, 11.43% of sheep died of bradsot; 14.29% of birds died of influenza, 2.86% of cattle died of blackleg, and 2.86% of sheep died of dysentery.
For many years, Dagestan has been a region where brucellosis persists in cattle and small ruminants [15]. In the past year, 48 bovine brucellosis infected localities and 12 small ruminant brucellosis infected localities were reported, 117 and 13 outbreaks were detected, with the diseased animals in them representing, respectively, 68.21 and 27.59% of the total number of animals affected with quarantinable diseases. In order to improve the situation, the Veterinary Service of the Republic implements a set of veterinary-sanitary and organizational-economic anti-brucellosis measures. In 2023, 1,210.492 thousand cattle, 494.238 thousand small ruminants and 22.091 thousand horses were examined, of which 1,236; 500 and 1 animals, respectively, were found to be brucellosis positive. Vaccination against brucellosis covered 830.735 thousand cattle and 3,284.252 thousand small ruminants. The disease eradication measures for infected holdings, establishments and farms are implemented within the framework of the overall set of the disease control activities, including the culling of reactor animals based on the diagnostic test results and the simultaneous use of anti-brucellosis vaccines to ensure immune protection.
One of the most common infectious diseases causing significant economic damage is viral leukosis, which has been reported in dairy cows and young animals in the majority of municipal entities of Dagestan Republic for many years [16-18]. To detect the disease, a serological method such as agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test is used. In 2023, the Veterinary Service of the region conducted AGID tests of 1,104.244 thousand cattle; 2,778 animals (0.25% of the tested cattle) were found to be the virus carriers. It was established that in 25 rural areas, municipalities and transhumance zones, leukemia virus occurrence in animals was moderate (from 0.01 to 9.2%). Hematological tests detected 18 leukosis affected animals. During the period under study, 35 new leukosis infected localities were identified; the association of bovine leukosis with specific territories, namely the farms of the Babayurtovsky, Kizlyarsky, Kizilyurtovsky, Kumtorkalinsky, Tarumovsky raions and the city of Makhachkala, was noted. The implementation of measures provided for by the subprogramme “Prevention and eradication of bovine leukosis in the holdings of Dagestan Republic” of the governmental programme of Dagestan Republic “Development of agriculture and regulation of agricultural product, raw material and food markets”4 made it possible to eradicate the infection on many farms.
Dagestan remains a rabies infected region [19][20]. The rabies situation is challenging to a certain extent; during the period under study, the disease was reported in 10 infected localities: in cattle in 4 localities (Gunibsky, Tarumovsky, Khasavyurtovsky raions and the city of Makhachkala), in cats in 3 localities and in wild animals in 3 localities. In order to control the disease, monitoring tests and vaccination of susceptible animals are carried out in the region. In 2023, 4 wild animals, 5 cattle, 9 cats, 3 dogs were tested for rabies; 7,080 cats, 38,570 dogs, 118.311 thousand cattle, 725 horses and 21.210 thousand small ruminants were vaccinated.
Over the past year, 2 bradsot outbreaks were detected in the Republic, in which 4 sheep became diseased and died. Bradsot is an acute, often fulminant toxicoinfection of sheep and goats, which is characterized by sudden death of animals. In some cases, severe seizures, nervous manifestations are observed, and animals die within a few hours. A characteristic sign that provides grounds for bradsot suspicion is the hemorrhagic inflammation of the abomasum, which is detected by necropsy. In order to prevent bradsot, 872.144 thousand sheep were immunized on the farms of Dagestan.
In February 2023, high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak was detected in the area of a natural body of water located 1 km northeast of the settlement of Solnechnoye (Khasavyurtovsky raion), where 5 swans became diseased and died. The diagnosis was confirmed by laboratory tests, and restrictive measures (quarantine) were imposed. Subsequently, no new death cases were reported in synanthropic, wild birds and poultry. In order to control the HPAI situation, 5 wild birds and 8,410 poultry were examined, 36,608 poultry were vaccinated against high pathogenicity avian influenza.
As for other quarantinable infectious diseases such as pasteurellosis, blackleg, enterotoxemia, dysentery, ovine epididymitis and dourine, single cases were reported, and the measures taken made it possible to contain the diseases and prevent economic damage.
In order to maintain animal disease freedom and sustainable growth of livestock production, the Veterinary Committee of Dagestan Republic annually implements measures to prevent the occurrence and spread of 75 diseases of animals and birds, including 10 highly dangerous ones.
Anti-epizootic measures taken in the past year included a total of 93.8 million vaccinations and 6.2 million tests performed in the diagnostic institutions. Plans for the prevention of highly dangerous and other contagious diseases of animals and birds were fully implemented.
CONCLUSION
The analysis of the study findings shows that animal infectious diseases mentioned in the paper are the main factors hindering the development of livestock farming in Dagestan Republic. The complete eradication of these infections is not yet possible. However, it is possible to monitor changes in the animal disease situation and reduce its tension, using real epizootological monitoring data for this purpose. The risk of animal infectious disease occurrence dictates the need for the implementation of the systematic monitoring and careful analysis of the animal disease situation. In 2023, 114 quarantinable animal disease infected localities were reported in Dagestan Republic, including 60 for brucellosis in cattle and small ruminants, 35 for bovine leukosis, 10 for rabies in domestic and wild animals, 4 for enterotoxemia, 2 for pasteurellosis, 2 for bradsot and 1 for blackleg. As of the end of the period under study, there were 183 infected localities, including 96 for bovine leukosis, 80 for bovine and small ruminant brucellosis, 6 for ovine epididymitis and 1 for blackleg. The presented data on the occurrence of quarantinable animal diseases contribute to the scientific and practical studies of the epizootiology of the main infectious diseases reported in Dagestan Republic.
1. On approval of the zonal classification of municipal areas and urban districts of Dagestan Republic: Decree of the Government of Dagestan Republic No. 48 of 11 March 2019. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/553164815 (in Russ.)
2. Bakulov I. A., Yurkov G. G., Peskovatskov A. P., Vedernikov V. A. Methodical guidelines for epizootological study. Moscow: Kolos; 1982. 20 p. (in Russ.)
3. Bakulov I. A. Recommendations on epizootological study methods. Pokrov; 1975. 75 p. (in Russ.)
4. On approval of the governmental programme of Dagestan Republic “Development of agriculture and regulation of agricultural product, raw material and food markets”: Decree of the Government of Dagestan Republic No. 673 of 13 December 2013. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/422452925 (in Russ.)
References
1. Gulyukin M. I., Gulyukin A. M., Donchenko A. S., Donchenko N. A., Barsukov Yu. I., Loginov S. I., et al. Analysis of the episootic situation of cattle leukemia in the Siberian FederalDistrict. SiberianHerald ofAgricultural Science. 2021; 51 (4): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2021-4-8 (in Russ.)
2. Karaulov A. K., Varkentin А. V., Petrova О. N., Tatsenko Е. Е., Scherbinin S. V., Semenova Е. А., et al. Epizootic situation in the Russian Federation, 2022. Vladimir: FGBI “ARRIAH”, 2022. https://fsvps.gov.ru/sites/default/files/files/iac/2022/2021_31_12_godovoy_otchet.pdf. (in Russ.)
3. Gulyukin M. I., Stepanova T. V., Ivanova L. A., Kozyreva N. G., Shabeykin A. A., Kolomytsev S. A., et al. Distribution and control measures against bovine leukemia in the Central Federal District. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2019; (6): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2019-6-1 (in Russ.)
4. Gustokashin K. A. Ispol’zovanie informatsionnykh tekhnologii dlya sozdaniya sistemy epizootologicheskogo monitoringa = The use of information technology to establish an epizootological monitoring system. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University. 2003; (1): 197–199. https://elibrary.ru/peofnx (in Russ.)
5. Ivanov A. V., Chernov A. N., Ivanov A. A. Aktual’nye problemy biologicheskoi bezopasnosti = Topical issues of biological safety. Veterinary Medicine (Kharkiv). 2010; 94: 28–30. https://elibrary.ru/ykecuz (in Russ.)
6. Alekhin R. M., Bakulov I. A., Vedernikov V. A., Kotov V. T., Makarov V. V., Orlov F. M., et al. Guidance on general epizootiology. Moscow: Kolos; 1979; 261–277. (in Russ.)
7. Guslavskiy I. I., Apalkin V. A. General epizootiology and veterinary hygiene: a lecture course. Barnaul: Altai State Agricultural University; 2003; 160 p. https://www.elibrary.ru/ysfzke (in Russ.)
8. Budulov N. R., Shapiev M. Sh., Ozdemirov R. A. Nosological profile of infectious pathology of cattle in Dagestan Republic. Veterinariya. 2018; (12): 17–23. https://elibrary.ru/yoecqx (in Russ.)
9. Ponomarenko D. G., Rusanova D. V., Khachaturova A. A., Skudareva O. N., Logvinenko O. V., Rakitina E. L., et al. Analysis of the epidemic and epizootic situation on brucellosis around the world in 2019 and the forecast for the Russian Federation for 2020. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2020; (2): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.21055/0370-1069-2020-2-48-56 (in Russ.)
10. Karaulov A. K., Petrova O. N., Tatsenko E. E. Epizooticheskaya situatsiya po osobo opasnym boleznyam zhivotnykh v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2014–2016 gg. = Epizootic situation for highly dangerous animal diseases in the Russian Federation in 2014–2016. Molekulyarnaya diagnostika 2017: sbornik trudov IX Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Moskva, 18–20 aprelya 2017 g.). Tom 2 = Molecular diagnosis 2017: proceedings of the IX All-Russia Research-to-Practice Conference with International Participation (Moscow, 18–20 April 2017). Vol. 2. Tambov: LLC “Yulis”; 2017; 410–411. https://elibrary.ru/zohyfj (in Russ.)
11. Mischenko A. V., Karaulov A. K., Petrova O. N. Epizooticheskaya situatsiya po otdel’nym osobo opasnym boleznyam krupnogo i melkogo rogatogo skota v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i mire v 2015–2016 gg. = Epizootic situation for some highly dangerous diseases of cattle and small ruminants in the Russian Federation and in the world in 2015–2016. Aktual’nye veterinarnye aspekty molochnogo i myasnogo zhivotnovodstva: materialy VIIMezhdunarodnogo veterinarnogo kongressa (Ufa, 19–20 aprelya 2017 g.) = Major veterinary aspects of dairy and meat farming: proceedings of the VII International Veterinary Congress (Ufa, 19–20 April 2017). Ufa; 2017. http://zhukov-vet.ru/doc/cow/Мищенко.pdf (in Russ.)
12. Dzhupina S. I. Epizootological study methods and epizootic process theory. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sibirskoe otdelenie; 1991. 138 p. (in Russ.)
13. Arakelyan P. K., Tregubov A. N., Rudenko A. V., Ilyin E. N., Khristenko N. V., Vergun A. A., et al. Protivoepidemicheskaya znachimost’ kontrolya epizooticheskogo protsessa brutselleza = Anti-epidemic significance of brucellosis epizootic process control. Problemy osobo opasnykh infektsii na Severnom Kavkaze: materialy regional’noi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennoi 70-letiyu so dnya osnovaniya FKUZ Stavropol’skii protivochumnyi institut Rospotrebnadzora (Stavropol’, 17 maya 2022 g.) = Problems of highly dangerous infections in the North Caucasus: proceedings of the regional research-to-practice conference with international participation dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the Stavropol Plague Control Institute of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) (Stavropol, 17 May 2022). Stavropol: Expo-Media LLC; 2022; 69–70. https://www.elibrary.ru/owvsdn (in Russ.)
14. Konopatkin A. A., Bakulov I. A., Nuikin Ya. V., Artemov B. T., Bessarabov B. F., Kadymov R. A., et al. Epizootology and infectious livestock diseases: study guide. Moscow: Kolos; 1984. 544 p. (in Russ.)
15. Mikailov M. M., Budulov N. R., Gunashev Sh. A., Aliev A. Yu., Yanikova E. A., Halikov A. A., Chernykh O. Yu. Indicators of cows spontaneously infected with leukemia virus in the combined course of leukemia-brucellosis infection. Veterinariya. 2023; (12): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2023.26.12.17-21 (in Russ.)
16. Budulov N. R., Aliev A. Yu. Distribution and control measures with cattle leukemia in Dagestan Republic. Veterinariya. 2021; (6): 15–20. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2021.24.6.15-20 (in Russ.)
17. Mustafayev A. R. Various factors affecting the spread of bovine leukemia in the Republic of Dagestan. Mining agriculture. 2020; (2): 173–177. https://doi.org/10.25691/GSH.2020.2.029 (in Russ.)
18. Mustafayev A. R. Comparative analysis of the bovine leukemia spread in the Republic of Dagestan. Veterinarian. 2019; (2): 25–30. https://doi.org/10.33632/1998-698X.2019-2-25-30 (in Russ.)
19. Gunashev Sh., Dzhambulatov Z., Musiev D., Abduragimova R., Azaev G., Mayorova T., Mikailov M. Infectious diseases of animals in the Republic of Dagestan. Veterinariya sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh. 2021; (12): 22–26. https://elibrary.ru/optrht (in Russ.)
20. Budulov N. R. Modern episootic situation on infectious diseases of cattle in Dagestan Republic. Actual Questions of Veterinary Biology. 2020; (2): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.24411/2074-5036-2020-10014 (in Russ.)
About the Authors
M. M. MikailovRussian Federation
Mikail M. Mikailov - Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology of Farm Animals
88 Dakhadaeva str., Makhachkala 367000, Republic of Dagestan
N. R. Budulov
Russian Federation
Nurdin R. Budulov - Dr. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology of Farm Animals
88 Dakhadaeva str., Makhachkala 367000, Republic of Dagestan
Sh. A. Gunashev
Russian Federation
Shakhrudin A. Gunashev - Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology of Farm Animals
88 Dakhadaeva str., Makhachkala 367000, Republic of Dagestan
E. A. Yanikova
Russian Federation
Elmira A. Yanikova - Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology of Farm Animals
88 Dakhadaeva str., Makhachkala 367000, Republic of Dagestan
Review
For citations:
Mikailov M.M., Budulov N.R., Gunashev Sh.A., Yanikova E.A. Overview of animal infectious disease situation in the Republic of Dagestan in 2023. Veterinary Science Today. 2024;13(3):255-260. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-3-255-260