Preview

Veterinary Science Today

Advanced search

Development and validation of highly sensitive multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of classical swine fever virus genome

https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-3-223-233

Contents

Scroll to:

Abstract

Classical swine fever (CSF) remains a challenge for pig farming industrial lover the world despite the measures taken. The last CS  case in the Russian Federation was reported in 2020, however, the threat of the disease emerging still persists. A set of anti-epidemic measures including mainly preventive vaccination and annual diagnostic monitoring using molecular-genetic and serological methods is required for CSF virus introduction prevention and rapid eradication of potential disease out breaks. Therefore, areal-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using an internal control sample has been developed. Therefore, areal time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using an internal control sample has been developed. Modified primers (locked nucleic acids containing conformationally blocked nucleosides) providing a higher affinity to the DNA matrix and physico-chemical stability and a FAM-labeled TaqMan probe were selected for 5’-untranslatedregion of the genome. The following validation parameters were defined: accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, specificity and sensitivity. For comparative analysis of the developed as say sensitivity, swabs, samples of organs and tissues collected from pigs experimentally infected with an epizootic strain of the classical swine fever virus (spleen, kidney, liver, blood, lymph nodes, rectal and oral smears), animal-contaminated feed and virus-containing material with known virus titres were also tested in parallel with coded test systems No. x1 andx2. The developed assay was shown to have 100% diagnostic sensitivity and detection limit of 0,23 lgCCID50/cm3. Therewith, there sults of analysis of test systems No. x1, x2 based on above parameters were lower that could give rise to false positive real-time RT-PCR results and incorrect diagnosis. Thus, described assay can be used for extensive monitoring of classical swine fever in the Russian Federation

For citations:


Sadchikova A.S., Igolkin A.S., Chernyshev R.S., Kozlov A.A., Kolbin I.S., Sprygin A.V., Biryuchenkov D.A., Chvala I.A., Mazloum A. Development and validation of highly sensitive multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of classical swine fever virus genome. Veterinary Science Today. 2024;13(3):223-233. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-3-223-233

INTRODUCTION

Classical swine fever (CSF, Pestis suum) is one of the major viral diseases having a significant impact on pig farming and wild boar hunting [1].

The CSF etiological agent is a Pestivirus C with a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome of 12.3 kb in length of the genus Pestivirus, family Flaviviridae [2]. RNA molecule contains 2 nontranslated regions (5’-NTR and 3’-NTR), as well as one open reading frame coding for 13 proteins (4 structural and 9 nonstructural proteins) [3].

According to the recommendations of the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) classical swine fever is subject to notification [4]. And despite the fact that CSF was eradicated in the European countries and in Russia, where the last outbreak in domestic pigs was reported in 2019 and the last outbreak in wild boars was reported in 2020, the threat of this transboundary disease introduction still persists, that requires systematic disease monitoring [5]. Due to the lack of reliable data on the number of samples tested within passive serological monitoring, it is difficult to reliably prove absence of virulent CSFV circulation in wild boar population in Russia [6].

Currently, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay is widely used as one of the most rapid, specific and sensitive molecular biological methods for the pathogen genetic material detection [7]. However, the classical PCR assay with electrophoretic detection in agarose gel is a time- and labour-consuming method posing a high risk of cross-contamination [8]. The real-time multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) with an internal control sample (ICS) minimizing unreliable results is the most suitable for CSF diagnosis, including screening and monitoring [9].

TaqMan probes enabling real-time hybridization-fluorescence detection of PCR products and being the most practical and reliable ones for pestivirus infection diagnosis are used in some assays [10]. Most real-time RT-PCR-based test systems described earlier for the CSFV genome detection amplify a fragment of 5’-nontranslated region (5’-NTR) and demonstrate sufficient sensitivity and specificity [11]. Modification of oligonucleotides in locked nucleic acids (LNA) increases primer affinity to the target DNA and provides for physicochemical stability [12]

Exogenous ICS allows for avoiding false negative results due to errors both at the stage of sample preparation (nucleic acid extraction) and at the stage of the target fragment amplification [13].

The study was aimed at development and validation of highly sensitive, specific and reproducible multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay enabling diagnosis of all CSFV subgenotypes circulating in the Russian Federation territory (1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.3) in the period from 1982 to 2020 [5][14]. Such assay should have characteristics meeting all the requirements for a real-time PCR-based test system and be widely applicable in monitoring for the infection diagnosis [15].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Viruses and bacteria. The following CSFV strains were used for the assay development: reference Shimen strain, 684 strain, 719 strain (subgenotype 1.1), vaccine SK strain (subgenotype 1.2), CSF Amur 19-10/WB-12555 strain and CSF Tigrovoe 16/WB-634 (subgenotype 2.1), 275 strain (subgenotype 2.2), 368, 870, 843 strains (subgenotype 2.3) and CSFV 589, 924, 925, 929, 917, 918, 920, 926, 927, 930 strains with unidentified virus genotype isolated in the period of 1982–2020.

The following heterologous porcine disease agents were used for determination of the assay analytical specificity: vaccine VK-DEP strain of Aujeszky’s disease virus, Irkutsky 2007 strain of American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), reference Mozambique-78 strain of African swine fever virus (ASFV) genotype V; Chelyabinsk 2021 isolate of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) genotype II, field isolate of swine erysipelas agent (Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae). The biological pathogens were obtained in the form of freeze-dried material from the State Microorganism Strain Collection and working microorganism collection of the Federal Centre for Animal Health.

Animals. Piglets at the age of 2–2.5 months weighing 10–15 kg and obtained from CSF-free farms located in the Vladimir Oblast were used for primary cell culture preparation. The piglets were euthanized and testicular explants were collected in accordance with the requirements of Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Cultivation. CSFV was propagated in the initially trypsinized swine testicle (ST) cell culture cultivated in Eagle-MEM medium prepared according to the Federal Centre for Animal Health procedure and supplemented with 10% bovine fetal serum and 50 μg/cm3 of gentamicin sulphate [16]. The virus reproduction was identified with real-time RT-PCR according with the methodical guidelines1.

Internal control sample (ICS). MS2, RNA-containing bacteriophage belonging to Leviviridae family and pathogenic for Escherichia coli, was selected as an ICS [17].

Designing of primers and probes. cDNA nucleotide sequences of different CSFV subgenotypes imported from the GenBank database were aligned and subjected to comparative molecular-genetic analysis using Bioedit v7.2.5 and NCBI: Nucleotide BLAST software. Conserved segments of CSFV genome served as a criterion for selection of optimal primers. Primers and probe for amplification and hybridization of ICS fragment were selected based on the literature data [18]. Synthesis of oligonucleotides was performed at the Syntol company (Russia).

Extraction of nucleic acids. CSFV RNA was extracted from the virus-containing ST cell culture suspension, genomes of heterologous viruses and bacteria were extracted from freeze-dried materials with nucleosorption method using RIBO-sorb reagent kit for DNA/RNA extraction from biological materials (Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing, Russia) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructuctions2.

Real-time RT-PCR procedure. PCR master mix produced by the Eurogene (Russia) contained the following components: OneTube RT-PCR TaqMan kit consisting of OneTube RT-PCRmix, TM-MMLV revertase, nuclease-free water. All PCR stages (reverse transcription, amplification and fluorescence-hybridization detection) were performed in automatic Rotor-Gene Q thermocycler using provided software (QIAGEN, Germany).

Positive control sample (PCS). Vaccine SK strain of CSFV (virus titer – 3.5 lg CCID50/cm3) in the form of freeze-dried material dissolved in 4.0 cm3 of saline solution and thermally inactivated by heating for 60 minutes at +60 °C was used as a positive control. Tests for inactivation completeness were carried out by three blind passages in ST cell culture according to the methodical guidelines1.

Negative control sample (NCS). Nuclease-free water produced by the Eurogene (Russia) was used as a negative control.

Validation. Validation parameters were determined in accordance with the recommended guidelines for publication of the quantitative real-time PCR development outcomes (MIQE: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments) [19]. To determine accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility CSFV 719 strain-positive sample was analyzed in 6 repeated reactions, in 3 parallel tests performed by the same operator within one day and in 3 parallel tests performed by two operators within 3 days. Analytical sensitivity (detection limit) was estimated using 10-fold dilutions of CSFV 719, 684, Shimen strain with known titer. Detection limit was expressed as minimal virus titer (lg CCID50/cm3) detected by the assay under validation. Amplification efficiency was calculated according to the formula:

Е = (101/slope – 1) × 100%,

where slope – the slope value of the linear region of the curve constructed using the Ct values plotted on a logarithmic scale according to cDNA matrix concentration.

The real-time RT-PCR assay was tested for its analytical specificity using known CSFV RNA-negative samples containing extracted genomes of heterologous viruses and bacteria as well as using CSFV strains of different subgenotypes. To tests the assay for its diagnostic sensitivity a panel of 27 true positive samples (spleen, liver, kidney, blood, lymph nodes, muscle, oral and rectal swabs) collected from the pigs experimentally infected with epizootic CSFV strain at different stages of the infection process as well as contaminated feed samples was prepared. The assay was tested for its diagnostic specificity by examination of 27 known negative samples of complete mixed feed for pigs, 10% spleen, liver, lymph node suspensions, porcine meat products, whole blood, oral and rectal swabs that were free from CSF and were prepared at the Federal Centre for Animal Health Reference Laboratory for ASF for official animal disease monitoring implementation and for commercial tests of samples from pig holdings located in the European part of the Russian Federation. The assay was tested for its diagnostic and analytical sensitivity in comparison with coded Russian test-systems No. x1, x2 by parallel testing of the samples. The coded test systems were used according to their manufacturers’ instructions. The selected test systems are the most commonly used in Russia for the CSF diagnosis and contain ICS similar to that one used in the tested assay.

The data were statistically processed with Microsoft Excel. GraphPad Prism programme was used for graph plotting.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Oligonucleotide design. Alignment and comparative assessment of nucleotides sequences of CSFV strains of different subgenotypes showed that, as expected, 5’-NTR was the most conservative genome region. Forward and reverse LNA-containing primers amplifying 120 nucleotides fragment were selected for this region (Fig. 1).

TaqMan probes for the target fragment of CSFV genome and for ICS fragment were labelled by fluorophores: 6-FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) and Cy5.5 (cyanine-5.5), respectively.

Optimization of real-time RT-PCR conditions. Thermal-temporal profile and quantitative composition of the PCR mix were determined during the optimization.

The PCR mix for one reaction contained 1Х OneTube RT-PCRmix, 0.4 pmol of forward primer and 0.4 pmol of reverse primer, 0.2 pmol of TaqMan-probe specific for the CSFV fragment; 0.1 pmol of forward primer and 0.1 pmol of reverse primer and TaqMan probe specific for ICS fragment, 1Х TM-MMLV revertase, 10.0 μL of RNA matrix. Nuclease-free water was added to make the final reaction mix volume of 25.0 μL.

The PCR procedure included reverse transcription at 50 °C for 25 minutes and double-cycling amplification: general denaturation to inactivate revertase and activate DNA polymerase with a “hot-start” at 95 °C for 10 minutes, the first 10 cycles without fluorescence detection (denaturation at 95 °C for 10 seconds, primer annealing at 60 °C for 40 seconds, elongation at 72 °C for 10 seconds), then 35 cycles with fluorescence detection on the Green and Crimson channels (denaturation at 95 °C for 10 seconds, primer annealing at 55 °C for 40 seconds, elongation at 72 °C for 10 seconds).

ICS selection and optimization. MS2 bacteriophage is used as ICS for diagnosis of diseases caused by RNA viruses (hepatitis C, acquired human immunodeficiency syndrome, etc.). The phage of the Leviviridae family is a small icosahedral virion, pathogenic for Escherichia coli. The genome is made of single-stranded RNA of 3,569 nucleotides in length [20]. MS2 was chosen as ICS owing to its RNA genome and safety for humans, animals, and plants [21].

Intact ST cell culture, 10% spleen suspension samples collected from pigs infected with epizootic CSFV strain and from CSF-free pigs, culture CSFV 719 strain and NCS with different MS2 bacteriophage contents in the sample were tested to determine sufficient ICS concentration for adding to RNA extraction system (Table 1).

As a result, the optimal ICS amount was 3.2 × 103 PFU of MS2 bacteriophage per 100 μL of the sample. MS2 suspension with recommended titer was tested by storing at a temperature of +4 °C, and was found to have a stable threshold amplification cycle (Ct) with changes of ± 2 Ct when it was used for real-time RT-PCR after six-months storage. Ct value remained stable during five freezing (–20 °C) / thawing (room temperature) cycles.

Assessment of accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility. The developed assay under validation was shown to have 100% accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility during tests since known CSFV 719 strain-positive sample was found positive during 6 repeats in 3 parallel tests performed by one operator within one day and 3 parallel tests performed by two operators during three days (Table 2).

However, according to the graph (Fig. 2), Ct value increased by 3.09 ± 0.81 on day 3 of testing of the same sample as compared to that one on day 2 of testing by two operators that could be accounted for multiple freezing/thawing of the virus-containing material.

Assessment of analytical sensitivity. Mean minimum CSFV titers detectable by the real-time RT-PCR assay in 0.23 lg CCID50/cm3 were determined for CSFV 719, 684 and Shimen strains.

According to Table 3, comparative analysis of parallel tests of the virus strains using different real-time RT-PCR-based test systems showed that for CSFV 684 strain the detection limit of the developed assay was 1.2 lg higher than detection limits of test systems No. x1 and x2, and for reference Shimen strain the detection limit of the developed assay was 2.0 lg higher than that one of the test system No. x2. CSFV 719 strain-containing sample with a titer of 7.5 lg CCID50/cm3 was tested with the developed assay with positive results, while inconclusive results were obtained when the same sample was subjected to parallel tests using test systems No. x1 and x2.

A graph of correlation was plotted based on obtained Ct values (n = 3) and 10-fold dilutions of CSFV 719 strain (Fig. 3).

The high statistical parameters calculated using correlation analysis were as follows: reaction efficiency E = 105%, adequacy coefficient R2 = 0.9928 and significance criterion p value < 0.0001, that were indicative of the prospects of this real-time RT-PCR assay use for further development of quantitative PCR with reference samples.

Assessment of analytical specificity. Samples containing heterologous virus and bacteria genomes (ASFV, Aujeszky’s disease virus, PRRSV, erysipelas agent and BVDV) were tested with the real-time RT-PCR assay with negative results and samples containing CSFV strains were tested CSFV RNA-positive with the real-time RT-PCR assay, so analytical specificity of the real-time RT-PCR assay was 100% (Table 4).

ICS fragment amplification was found to be inhibited at high Ct value on the Green channel (CSFV genome) that could be accounted for consumption of the reaction mix components (deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, DNA polymerase, etc.) for the target PCR product synthesis with a large number of the matrix copies [20]. This should be taken into account when interpreting the results.

Determination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. All 27 true positive samples containing CSFV or collected from the pigs experimentally infected with epizootic CSFV strain as well as samples of the feed contaminated by infected animals were tested positive for CSFV genome with the real-time RT-PCR assay. Similarly, all 27 true negative samples were tested negative for CSFV RNA with the real-tine RT-PCR assay (Fig. 4).

Thus, the tests showed that diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the assay were as high as possible and equaled to 100%. At the same time, the real-time RT-PCR-based test system No. x2 did not detect a positive blood sample collected from pigs experimentally infected with epizootic CSFV strain, as well as a positive feed sample collected in the animal facility where the pigs experimentally infected with the same strain were kept, test-system No. x1 also did not detect the said positive blood sample that was indicative of their lower diagnostic sensitivity (92.6% for test system No. x2 and 96.3% for test system No. x1) than that one of the developed assay under validation.

Analysis and interpretation of the results. The recommended parameters of PCR assay for the Green and Crimson channels were identical: dynamic baseline setting, slope correction, emission reduction by 10%, linear scale, and threshold value of 0.05. The results were interpreted based on the presence or absence the standard curve intersection with the set threshold line that corresponds to Ct value presence or absence in relative line of the results table (Fig. 5).

Also, 2-fold dilution of the RNA extracted from CSFV 719 strain suspension with final titer of 7.5 lg CCID50/cm3 was tested to establish the PCR assay parameters and to determine maximum Ct value at which the sample could be interpreted as “positive” (Table 5).

The obtained data showed that the maximum Ct value was 27.83 that was equivalent to CSFV 719 strain titer of 0.23 lg CCID50/cm3.

The result was considered reliable when the correct results were obtained for positive and negative controls.

The sample was considered positive for CSFV genome when Ct value on Green channel did not exceed 28. In this case, the result was valid regardless of the values on Crimson channel.

A result for the presence of the CSFV genome was interpreted as negative when there was no Ct value on Green channel, but Ct value on Crimson channel did not exceed 31.

If Ct value on Green channel exceeded 28, but on Crimson channel was less than 31 the PCR result was considered inconclusive.

When there were no Ct values on Green and Crimson channels, as well as when Ct value on Crimson channel exceeded 31, the PCR result was considered invalid.

In case of inconclusive or invalid results the sample was to be retested starting from the RNA extraction stage in order to confirm absence or presence of CSFV genome in the sample.

Fig. 1. Alignment of CSFV genome 5’-untranslated region (5’-NTR) sequences obtained from the GenBank (forward and reverse primer annealing sites are given in orange, TaqMan probe hybridization region is given in green)

Table 1

Results of internal control sample (ICS) titration with real-time RT-PCR using samples of different types

Sample

ICS titer (PFU/reaction)

Ct/Green

Ct/Crimson

NCS

105

20.22

Intact ST cell culture

26.02

10% spleen suspension from CSF-free pig

10% spleen suspension from CSFV infected pig

14.28

CSFV 719 strain-containing suspension

6.15

NCS

3.2 × 105

19.85

Intact ST cell culture

25.67

10% spleen suspension from CSF-free pig

22.80

10% spleen suspension from CSFV infected pig

13.62

23.22

CSFV 719 strain-containing suspension

5.66

NCS

106

14.11

Intact ST cell culture

15.93

10% spleen suspension from CSF-free pig

17.90

10% spleen suspension from CSFV infected pig

15.12

14.73

CSFV 719 strain-containing suspension

5.95

26.07

NCS

3.2 × 106

11.70

Intact ST cell culture

13.21

10% spleen suspension from CSF-free pig

15.21

10% spleen suspension from CSFV infected pig

12.10

10.48

CSFV 719 strain-containing suspension

5.56

24.25

NCS

107

12.34

Intact ST cell culture

17.82

10% spleen suspension from CSF-free pig

11.93

10% spleen suspension from CSFV infected pig

14.43

CSFV 719 strain-containing suspension

8.37

“–” – negative result; PFU – plaque-forming unit; Ct/Green – cycle threshold value for CSFV genome detection; Ct/Crimson –cycle threshold value for ICS detection.

Table 2

Developed real-time RT-PCR assay accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility values

Accuracy

Sample

Ct/Green

(mean value ± SD)

Ct/Crimson

CSFV 719 strain

5.31

5.32 ± 0.148

CSFV 719 strain

5.22

27.29

CSFV 719 strain

5.30

26.01

CSFV 719 strain

5.52

27.27

CSFV 719 strain

5.33

26.67

CSFV 719 strain

5.28

29.37

Repeatability

Procedure

Ct/Green

(mean value ± SD)

Ct/Crimson

First measurement

5.38

5.64 ± 0.237

28.63

First measurement

5.74

26.85

First measurement

5.71

22.68

First measurement

5.61

23.78

First measurement

5.59

23.87

First measurement

5.86

24.41

Second measurement

5.63

5.44 ± 0.493

23.14

Second measurement

5.37

23.95

Second measurement

5.02

23.62

Second measurement

5.11

23.11

Second measurement

5.96

23.01

Second measurement

5.56

23.70

Third measurement

5.59

5.60 ± 0.095

28.84

Third measurement

5.60

30.30

Third measurement

5.58

28.72

Third measurement

5.74

30.26

Third measurement

5.57

28.06

Third measurement

5.57

28.87

Reproducibility (Ct/Green)

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

first operator

second operator

first operator

second operator

first operator

second operator

5.52

5.07

5.67

6.51

7.83

8.95

5.27

5.10

5.61

4.70

8.01

9.19

5.46

5.82

5.65

4.55

6.71

9.17

5.42

5.98

5.64

5.14

8.28

8.98

5.38

5.33

5.73

5.44

8.02

9.30

5.46

5.06

5.78

5.49

9.21

9.34

5.4183 ± 0.125

5.3933 ± 0.591

5.68 ± 0.0917

5.305 ± 1.019

8.01 ± 1.166

9.155 ± 0.233

“–” – negative result; Ct/Green – cycle threshold value for CSFV fragment; Ct/Crimson – cycle threshold value for ICS fragment.

Fig. 2. Distribution of Ct values for known positive sample in different days of testing when the real-time RT-PCR assay was assessed for its reproducibility

Fig. 3. Graph of linear correlation of CSFV 719 strain dilutions with Ct-values

Table 3

Real-time RT-PCR results for 10-fold dilutions of various epizootic CSFV strains

Virus dilution

Shimen strain

(titer – 4.0 lg CCID50/cm3)

719 strain

(titer – 7.5 lg CCID50/cm3)

684 strain

(titer – 6.2 lg CCID50/cm3)

Ct/Green

Ct/Green

Ct/Green

Non-
diluted

11.88 (pos)

5.41 (pos)

6.79 (pos)

1:101

16.18 (pos)

9.75 (pos)

9.89 (pos)

1:102

20.52 (pos)

12.53 (pos)

13.69 (pos)

1:103

22.64 (pos)

16.68 (pos)

16.97 (pos)

1:104

27.06 (pos)

18.79 (pos)

20.24 (pos)

1:105

20.60 (pos)

23.45 (pos)

1:106

21.57 (pos)

26.30 (pos)

1:107

24.71 (pos)

1:108

Test system No. x1

Ct/Yellow (result)

Non-diluted

12.89 (pos)

6.44 (pos)

8.27 (pos)

1:101

16.77 (pos)

8.33 (pos)

12.89 (pos)

1:102

18.67 (pos)

13.56 (pos)

15.08 (pos)

1:103

21.96 (pos)

17.67 (pos)

17.36 (pos)

1:104

25.78 (pos)

18.82 (pos)

22.85 (pos)

1:105

24.01 (pos)

26.57 (inconcl)

1:106

22.79 (pos)

1:107

28.19 (inconcl)

1:108

Test system No. x2

Ct/Yellow (result)

Non-diluted

19.07 (pos)

10.60 (pos)

9.37 (pos)

1:101

22.42 (pos)

13.34 (pos)

12.69 (pos)

1:102

25.28 (pos)

16.46 (pos)

16.13 (pos)

1:103

17.67 (pos)

19.19 (pos)

1:104

20.55 (pos)

22.22 (pos)

1:105

22.55 (pos)

24.68 (pos)

1:106

25.44 (pos)

1:107

28.02 (inconcl.)

1:108

“–” – negative result; pos – positive result; inconcl – inconclusive result;
Ct/Green – cycle threshold value for CSFV fragment; Ct/Yellow – cycle threshold value for CSFV fragment obtained when real-time PCR-based test systems No. х1 and х2
were used in accordance with their manufactures’ instructions.

Table 4

Assessment of analytical specificity of the real-time RT-PCR assay when the assay was used for CSFV genome detection (n = 2)

Sample

Ct/Green

Ct/Crimson

Result of test for CSFV genome

Field Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae isolate

19.08

negative

PRRSV Irkutsky 2007 strain

13.03

negative

Aujeszky’s disease virus VK-DEP strain

13.73

negative

ASFV Mozambique-78 strain

15.39

negative

BVDV Chelyabinsk 2021 strain

15.31

negative

Reference CSFV Shimen strain

18.64

15.39

positive

CSFV Amur 19-10/WB-12555 strain

12.19

16.88

positive

CSFV Tigrovoe 16/WB-634 strain

17.26

18.02

positive

CSFV 275 strain

11.27

positive

CSFV 719 strain

6.56

positive

CSFV 843 strain

6.27

positive

CSFV 917 strain

6.24

positive

CSFV 918 strain

21.8

16.7

positive

CSFV 920 strain

21.16

14.88

positive

CSFV 926 strain

14.12

16.07

positive

CSFV 927 strain

13.61

17.91

positive

CSFV 930 strain

27.25

14.61

positive

CSFV 368 strain

10.01

19.04

positive

CSFV 589 strain

11.81

19.81

positive

CSFV 684 strain

6.79

17.15

positive

CSFV 870 strain

9.64

18.45

positive

CSFV 924 strain

13.26

18.89

positive

CSFV 925 strain

13.93

17.04

positive

CSFV 929 strain

15.28

19.12

positive

NCS

15.17

negative

PCS (vaccine SK strain of CSFV)

19.57

18.76

positive

“–” – negative result; Ct/Green – cycle threshold value for CSFV fragment; Ct/Crimson – cycle threshold value for ICS fragment.

Fig. 4. Kinetics of Ct values for the panel of samples selected for determination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (samples – 10% suspensions of the indicated organs; “+” – true positive sample; “–” – true negative sample;
l/n – lymph nodes; porcine raw meats and products were used as negative muscle samples)

Table 5

Real-time RT-PCR results for two-fold dilutions of CSFV RNA

CSFV RNA dilution

Ct/Green

non-diluted

6.04

1:21

6.86

1:22

7.55

1:23

8.75

1:24

12.02

1:25

11.75

1:26

12.06

1:27

12.90

1:28

13.42

1:29

14.61

1:210

15.61

1:211

16.32

1:212

17.19

1:213

18.21

1:214

19.27

1:215

20.14

1:216

21.17

1:217

22.08

1:218

22.98

1:219

24.06

1:220

24.74

1:221

24.22

1:222

26.13

1:223

26.18

1:224

27.83

1:225

27.01

1:226

1:227

1:228

1:229

1:230

CSFV RNA was extracted from CSFV 719 strain-containing suspension; titer 7.5 lg CCID50/cm3, “–” – negative result.


Fig. 5. Fluorescence curves: 1 – for Green channel (CSFV fragment); 2 – for Crimson channel (ICS fragment)

CONCLUSION

The developed assay has high validation characteristics: 100% accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility, analytical specificity, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, detection limit of 0.23 lg CCID50/cm3. Such characteristics make the developed real-time PCR-RV assay competitive on the domestic market of diagnostic tools and suitable for use for large-scale monitoring of CSF situation in Russia.

1. Kolbin I. S., Vlasova N. N., Igolkin А. S., Elsukova А. А., Gavrilova V. L., Puzankova О. S. Methodical guidelines for isolation of classical swine fever virus with real-time polymerase chain reaction with fluorescent hybridization probe for the product detection in primary cell cultures (porcine spleen, porcine bone marrow, porcine kidney, lamb testicle, swine testicle) approved by the Federal Centre for Animal Health on 14 September 2021, No. 42-21. Vladimir: Federal Centre for Animal Health, 2021. 56 p. (in Russ.)

2. Instruction on use of RIBO-sorb reagent kit for DNA/RNA extraction from clinical materials: approved by the Order No. 1337-Pr/09 of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Health Care of 20 February 2009. https://www.amplisens.ru/upload/iblock/259/RIBO-sorb.pdf (in Russ.)

References

1. Malik Y. S., Bhat S., Kumar O. R. V., Yadav A. K., Sircar S., Ansari M. I., et al. Classical swine fever virus biology, clinicopathology, diagnosis, vaccines and a meta-analysis of prevalence: A review from the Indian perspective. Pathogens. 2020; 9 (6):500. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9060500

2. Stark R., Meyers G., Rümenapf T., Thiel H. J. Processing of pestivirus polyprotein: cleavage site between autoprotease and nucleocapsid protein of classical swine fever virus. Journal of Virology. 1993; 67 (12): 7088–7095. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.67.12.7088-7095.1993

3. Blome S., Staubach C., Henke J., Carlson J., Beer M. Classical swine fever – an updated review. Viruses. 2017; 9 (4):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9040086

4. Edwards S., Fukusho A., Lefèvre P.-C., Lipowski A., Pejsak Z., Roehe P., Westergaard J. Classical swine fever: the global situation. Veterinary Microbiology. 2000; 73 (2–3): 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00138-3

5. Oganesyan А. S., Shevtsov А. А., Shcherbakov А. V., Korennoy F. I., Karaulov A. K. Classical swine fever: a retrospective analysis of the epizootic situation in the Russian Federation (2007–2021) and forecast for 2022. Veterinary Science Today. 2022; 11 (3): 229–238. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2022-11-3-229-238

6. Shevtsov A. Classical swine fever: prospects of eradication. Animal Husbandry of Russia. 2021; (10): 27–30. https://www.elibrary.ru/jfxalo (in Russ.)

7. Zhu H., Zhang H., Xu Y., Laššáková S., Korabečná M., Neužil P. PCR past, present and future. BioTechniques. 2020; 69 (4): 317–325. https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2020-0057

8. Hirschhorn J. W., Avery A., Schandl C. A. Managing a PCR contamination event in a molecular pathology laboratory. In: Clinical Applications of Nucleic Acid Amplification. Methods in Molecular Biology. Eds. M. B. Myers, C. A. Schandl. 2023; 2621: 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2950-5_2

9. Canal C. W., Hotzel I., de Almeida L. L., Roehe P. M., Masuda A. Differentiation of classical swine fever virus from ruminant pestiviruses by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Veterinary Microbiology. 1996; 48 (3–4): 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(95)00156-5

10. McGoldrick A., Lowings J. P., Ibata G., Sands J. J., Belak S., Paton D. J. A novel approach to the detection of classical swine fever virus by RT-PCR with a fluorogenic probe (TaqMan). Journal of Virological Methods. 1998; 72 (2): 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0934(97)00208-5

11. Hoffmann B., Beer M., Schelp C., Schirrmeier H., Depner K. Validation of a real-time RT-PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of classical swine fever. Journal of Virological Methods. 2005; 130 (1–2): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.05.030

12. Latorra D., Arar K., Hurley J. M. Design considerations and effects of LNA in PCR primers. Molecular and Cellular Probes. 2003; 17 (5): 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-8508(03)00062-8

13. Monpoeho S., Coste-Burel M., Costa-Mattioli M., Besse B., Chomel J., Billaudel S., Ferre V. Application of a real-time polymerase chain reaction with internal positive control for detection and quantification of enterovirus in cerebrospinal fluid. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2002; 21 (7): 532–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-002-0766-5

14. Gavrilova V. L., Puzankova O. S., Latyshev O. Ye., Igolkin A. S., Manin B. L., Zhbanova T. V., Yuzhakov A. G. Studying cultural and molecular characteristics of classical swine fever virus isolates recovered in 2016. Proceedings of the Federal Centre for Animal Health. 2017; 15: 82–101. https://www.elibrary.ru/xrdrrb (in Russ.)

15. Gilep A., Bashko N., Usanov S., Kamyshnikov V. Import-substituting domestic diagnostic tools. Laboratory Diagnostics. Eastern Europe. 2014; (4): 28–45. https://elibrary.ru/taxtgh (in Russ.)

16. Kolbin I. S., Igolkin A. S., Gavrilova V. L., Puzankova O. S., Aronova Ye. V., Yelsukova А. А., Vlasova N. N. Determination of reproductive properties of virulent and vaccine classical swine fever virus strains in primary and continuous cell cultures. Veterinary Science Today. 2022; 11 (2): 149–155. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2022-11-2-149-155

17. Dreier J., Störmer M., Kleesiek K. Use of bacteriophage MS2 as an internal control in viral reverse transcription-PCR assays. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005; 43 (9): 4551–4557. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.9.4551-4557.2005

18. O’Connell K. P., Bucher J. R., Anderson P. E., Cao C. J., Khan A. S., Gostomski M. V., Valdes J. J. Real-time fluorogenic reverse transcription-PCR assays for detection of bacteriophage MS2. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006; 72 (1): 478–483. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.1.478-483.2006

19. Bustin S. A., Benes V., Garson J. A., Hellemans J., Huggett J., Kubista M., et al. The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry. 2009; 55 (4): 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797

20. Buckwalter S. P., Sloan L. M., Cunningham S. A., Espy M. J., Uhl J. R., Jones M. F., et al. Inhibition controls for qualitative real-time PCR assays: Are they necessary for all specimen matrices? Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2014; 52 (6): 2139–2143. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.03389-13

21. Zambenedetti M. R., Pavoni D. P., Dallabona A. C., Dominguez A. C., Poersch C. de D., Fragoso S. P., Krieger M. A. Internal control for real-time polymerase chain reaction based on MS2 bacteriophage for RNA viruses diagnostics. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2017; 112 (5): 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160380


About the Authors

A. S. Sadchikova
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Anastasiya S. Sadchikova - Postgraduate Student, Veterinarian, Reference Laboratory for African Swine Fever

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



A. S. Igolkin
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Alexey  S.  Igolkin - Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Head of Reference Laboratory for African Swine Fever

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



R. S. Chernyshev
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Roman  S.  Chernyshev - Postgraduate Student, Veterinarian, Reference Laboratory for African Swine Fever

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



A. A. Kozlov
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Anton A. Kozlov - Cand. Sci. (Biology), Researcher, Reference  Laboratory for Avian Viral Diseases

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



I. S. Kolbin
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Ivan S. Kolbin - Veterinarian, Reference Laboratory for African Swine Fever

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



A. V. Sprygin
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Alexander  V.  Sprygin - Dr. Sci. (Biology), Senior Researcher, Reference Laboratory for Bovine Diseases, Head of  Molecular and  Genetic Research Laboratory

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



D. A. Biryuchenkov
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Dmitriy А. Biryuchenkov - Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Head of Laboratory for Porcine Prevention

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



I. A. Chvala
Federal Centre for Animal Health
Russian Federation

Ilya A. Chvala - Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Deputy Director for Research

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901



A. Mazloum
Louisiana State University
United States

Ali Mazloum - Cand. Sci. (Biology)

Baton Rouge, LA 70803



Review

For citations:


Sadchikova A.S., Igolkin A.S., Chernyshev R.S., Kozlov A.A., Kolbin I.S., Sprygin A.V., Biryuchenkov D.A., Chvala I.A., Mazloum A. Development and validation of highly sensitive multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of classical swine fever virus genome. Veterinary Science Today. 2024;13(3):223-233. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-3-223-233

Views: 364


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-196X (Print)
ISSN 2658-6959 (Online)