Preview

Veterinary Science Today

Advanced search

Comparative assessment of immunodiffusion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay used for bovine leukosis diagnosis

https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2023-12-1-52-56

Abstract

The implementation of animal health improvement and disease prevention activities with respect to bovine leukosis involvesneed for timely detection of cattle infected with bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) on livestock farms. That is why early diagnosis using more sensitive and highly accurate methods is of particular importance. The paper presents the results of cattle serum tests for bovine leukosis with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunodiffusion (ID), as well as the comparative assessment of their effectiveness. A total of 440 cattle blood samples were subjected to serological testing with immunodiffusion; 37 (8.4%) of them tested positive for bovine leukaemia virus. The cattle blood samples were submitted from the Kumtorkalinsky (127), Karabudakhkentsky (122), Buynaksky (89) Raions, from Makhachkala (56) and Kaspiysk (46). Seropositivity was 17 (13.4%), 8 (6.6%), 5 (5.6%), 4 (7.1%) and 3 (6.5%), respectively. For the comparative assessment of the diagnostic tests, 100 (5 ID-positive and 95 ID-negative) serum samples were taken and tested with ELISA. As a result, specific antibodies against BLV gp51 antigen were detected in 4 ID-negative serum samples. All ID-positive serum samples also tested positive with ELISA. All in allvirus carriers were detected with ELISA, that is 44.4% more than with immunodiffusion. Thus, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is characterized by a higher sensitivity, as compared with immunodiffusion, and allows for improved detection of infected animals. Howeveralongside the advantages, this technique has certain disadvantages, one of which is the high price of the diagnostic test kit for anti-BLV antibody detection and the equipment required. 

About the Authors

A. R. Mustafayev
Caspian Regional Research Veterinary Institute – Branch of Dagestan Agriculture Science Center
Russian Federation

Arkif R. Mustafayev, Candidate of Science (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology of Farm Animals

Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan



M. O. Baratov
Caspian Regional Research Veterinary Institute – Branch of Dagestan Agriculture Science Center
Russian Federation

Magomed O. Baratov, Doctor of Science (Veterinary Medicine), Chief Researcher, Head of  Laboratory of  Infectious Pathology of Farm Animals

Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan



References

1. Gulykin M., Barabanov I., Ivanova L., Stepanova T., Kozireva N., Simonian G., et al. Monitoring of epidemiologic situation with bovine leukemia in production and breeding herds of Russian Federation in 2014–2015. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2016; 4: 5–41. eLIBRARY ID: 26383305. (in Russ.)

2. Mustafayev A. R. Epidemic situation on enzootic bovine leukosis in public and individual farms in the Republic of Dagestan. Veterinary Science Today. 2021; (2): 144–150. DOI: 10.29326/2304-196X-2021-2-37-144-150.

3. Mischenko V. A., Petrova O. N., Karaulov A. K., Mischenko A. V. Problema leikoza krupnogo rogatogo skota v Rossiiskoi Federatsii = The problem of bovine leukosis in the Russian Federation. BIO. 2018; 3 (210): 26–29; 4 (211): 24–28. eLIBRARY ID: 35562339; eLIBRARY ID: 35562349. (in Russ.) 4. Mustafaev A. R., Gulyukin M. I., Salikhov Yu. S. Monitoring of the spread of the bovine leukemia virus in the Republic of Dagestan in 2018. Veterinaria i kormlenie. 2019; 4: 18–20. DOI: 10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2019-4-5. (in Russ.)

4. Gillet N., Florins A., Boxus M., Burteau C., Nigro A., Vandermeers F., et al. Mechanisms of leukemogenesis induced by bovine leukemia virus: prospects for novel antiretroviral therapies in human. Retrovirology. 2007; 4:18. DOI: 10.1186/17424690418.

5. Mustafaev A. R., Budulov N. R., Shikhragimov E. M., Salihov U. S., Gaidarbekova Kh. M. Improving measures against bovine leukemia on the sample of farms of the Dagestan Republic. Veterinarya. 2015; 1: 23–26. eLIBRARY ID: 23057434. (in Russ.)

6. Rodríguez S. M., Florins A., Gillet N., de Brogniez A., SánchezAlcaraz M. T., Boxus M., et al. Preventive and therapeutic strategies for bovine leukemia virus: lessons for HTLV. Viruses. 2011; 3 (7): 1210–1248. DOI: 10.3390/v3071210.

7. Yu C., Wang X., Zhou Y., Wang Y., Zhang X., Zheng Y. Genotyping bovine leukemia virus in dairy cattle of Heilongjiang, northeastern China. BMC Vet. Res. 2019; 15 (1):179. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1863-3.

8. Osipova N. A., Agarkova T. A., Dvoeglazov N. G., Khramtsov V. V. Estimation of efficiency of comprehensive anti-leukemia measures in agricultural enterprises. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2019; 49 (5): 73–79. DOI: 10.26898/0370-8799-2019-5-10. (in Russ.) 10. Dvoyeglazov N. G., Agarkova T. A. Some features of sanitation measures against cattle leukosis viral infection using immunodiffusion test and ALISA. Veterinarian. 2010; 1: 22–24. eLIBRARY ID: 14477218. (in Russ.)

9. Trono K. G., Pérez-Filgueira D. M., Duffy S., Borca M. V., Carrillo C. Seroprevalence of bovine leukemia virus in dairy cattle in Argentina: comparison of sensitivity and specificity of different detection methods. Vet. Microbiol. 2001; 83 (3): 235–248. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00420-5.

10. Choi K. Y., Liu R. B., Buehring G. C. Relative sensitivity and specificity of agar gel immunodiffusion, enzyme immunosorbent assay, and immunoblotting for detection of anti-bovine leukemia virus antibodies in cattle. J. Virol. Methods. 2002; 104 (1): 33–39. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0934(02)00040-x.

11. Klintevall K., Näslund K., Svedlund G., Hajdu L., Linde N., Klingeborn B. Evaluation of an indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies to bovine leukaemia virus in milk and serum. J. Virol. Methods. 1991; 33 (3): 319–333. DOI: 10.1016/0166-0934(91)90032-u.

12. Wu D., Takahashi K., Murakami K., Tani K., Koguchi A., Asahina M., et al. B-1a, B-1b and conventional B cell lymphoma from enzootic bovine leukosis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996; 55 (1–3): 63–72. DOI: 10.1016/ s0165-2427(96)05631-0.

13. Mustafayev A. R. Bovine leukosis incidence in Republic of Dagestan in 2021. Veterinary Science Today. 2022; 11 (3): 216–221. DOI: 10.29326/2304- 196X-2022-11-3-216-221.

14. Bajseitov S. T., Novikova N. N., Vlasenko V. S., Krasikov A. P. Comparative evaluation of diagnostic efficiency of immunodiffusion reaction (IDR), ELISA and indirect reaction of immunofluorescence (IIR) for cattle leukemia. Vestnik of Omsk SAU. 2020; 1 (37): 97–102. eLIBRARY ID: 42742073. (in Russ.)

15. Dvoeglazov N. G., Khramtsov V. V., Agarkova T. A., Osipova N. A. Comparative analysis of application of ELISA and AGID in diagnosing bovine leukosis. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2015; (1): 89–93. eLIBRARY ID: 23059914. (in Russ.)

16. Donnik I. M., Ponomareva O. I., Krivonos R. A., Lysenko A. A., Koshchaev A. G., Chernykh O. Yu., et al. Elimination of bovine leukemia in industrial production conditions. Veterinaria Kubani. 2021; 2: 3–8. DOI: 10.33861/2071-8020-2021-2-3-8. (in Russ.)

17. Donnik I. M., Gulyukin M. I., Busol V. A., Kovalenko L. V., Kovalenko A. M. Bovine leukemia virus infection — diagnostics, eradication, and anthropozoonotic potential (background) (review). Agricultural Biology. 2021; 2 (56): 230–244. DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2021.2.230eng.

18. Nekoei S., Hafshejani T. T., Doosti A., Khamesipour F. Molecular detection of bovine leukemia virus in peripheral blood of Iranian cattle, camel and sheep. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2015; 18 (4): 703–707. DOI: 10.1515/pjvs-2015-0091.


Review

For citations:


Mustafayev A.R., Baratov M.O. Comparative assessment of immunodiffusion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay used for bovine leukosis diagnosis. Veterinary Science Today. 2023;12(1):52-56. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2023-12-1-52-56

Views: 400


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-196X (Print)
ISSN 2658-6959 (Online)