Problems and prospects of bovine tuberculosis serological diagnosis
https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2021-1-36-33-37
Abstract
For the purposes of tuberculosis eradication on any tuberculosis-infected farm, it is necessary to identify tuberculin anergic animals, being a potential source of the infection. The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of complement fixing and haemagglutinating antibodies for the detection cattle infected with bovine tuberculosis (TB). 977 cattle of different sex and age groups on two tuberculosis-infected farms were tested thrice over time. After 35 days all tuberculin reactive cattle (132 animals; 13.5%) were subjected to complex testing using allergy and serology methods. After 40 days, (Stage 3) animals demonstrating apparent specific antibody activity and low cell immunity were tested. Allergy tests were proved to be non-informative to diagnose tuberculosis on infected farms. Complement fixing and haemagglutinating antibodies were found to be active in tuberculin anergic animals. A higher antigenicity of Ukrainian RIEVM TB antigen complex as compared to Siberian RVI one was revealed by complement fixation test as well as by indirect haemagglutination test using VIEV polysaccharide antigen; the detection rate was 68 (7.0%), 28 (2.9%) and 299 (30.6%) respectively. The correlation between seropositivity and immunoreactivity was not established. Animals, positive in complement fixation and indirect haemagglutination tests, did not react to tuberculin. Nineteen out of twenty tuberculin reactive animals showed post mortem lesions, consistent with their seropositivity during post-mortem inspection; moreover, the postmortem lesions of animals, positive in complement fixation test using Siberian RVI antigen, were consistent in all cases. The results obtained suggest a high performance of allergy test and serological test combination and a promising potential of their complex use for tuberculosis diagnosis in cattle.
Keywords
About the Author
M. O. BaratovRussian Federation
Magomed O. Baratov, Doctor of Science (Veterinary Medicine), Chief Researcher, Deputy Director for Research
Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan
References
1. Naymanov A. Kh., Ovdienko N. P. Modern tasks of bovine tuberculosis control [Sovremennye zadachi v bor’be s tuberkulezom krupnogo rogatogo skota]. RacVetInform. 2002; 4: 8–9. eLIBRARY ID: 26215680. (in Russian)
2. Nuratinov R. A., Gazimagomedov M. G. Tuberculosis. Makhachkala. Planeta-Dagestan; 2009. 336 p. eLIBRARY ID: 19513359. (in Russian)
3. Beerwerth W. Mikobacterien in Viehtränken und Oberflächengewässer. Dtsch. Tierärtzl. Wschr. 2003; 80: 398–401. (in German)
4. Schliesser T. Tuberkulose bei Horns und Wildtieren. Prax. Pneum. 1974; 28 (9): 511–515. (in German)
5. Кarkadinovskaya I. A. Identification of reasons for allergic reactions to tuberculin in previously reactive cattle [Vyyasnenie prichin vypadeniya allergicheskih reakcij na tuberkulin u ranee reagirovavshego krupnogo rogatogo skota]. Proceedings of Leningrad Research Veterinary Institute [Trudy Leningradskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo veterinarnogo institute]. L.; 1956; 6: 103–110. (in Russian)
6. Lakman E. D. CFT in bovine tuberculosis diagnosis. Veterinariya. 1981; 4: 31–32. (in Russian)
7. Rotov V. I., Kokurichev P. I., Savchenko P. E., Trach Yu. A. Tuberculosis of livestock [Tuberkulez sel’skohozyajstvennyh zhivotnyh]. Under general editorship of V. I. Rotov. 2nd edition, amended and revised. Kiev: Urozhay; 1978. 237 p. (in Russian)
8. Kassich Yu. Ya, Borzyak A. T., Kochmarsky A. F., et al. Animal tuberculosis and measures to control it [Tuberkulez zhivotnyh I mery bor’by s nim]. Ed. by Yu. Ya. Kassich. Kiev: Urozhay; 1990. 303 p. (in Russian)
9. Kuzin A. I., Ovdienko N. P. Significance of serological methods in bovine tuberculosis diagnosis [Znachenie serologicheskih metodov v diagnostike tuberkuleza krupnogo rogatogo skota]. Bulletin of VIEV. 1988; 65: 48–51. (in Russian)
10. Donchenko A. S., Ovdienko N. P., Donchenko N. A. Diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis [Diagnostika tuberkuleza krupnogo rogatogo skota]. Responsible editor A. S. Donchenko. Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of RASHN; 2004. 308 p. (in Russian)
11. Buryak Е. I. Effectiveness of different in vivo diagnosis techniques of bovine tuberculosis [Effektivnost’ raznyh sposobov prizhiznennoj diagnostiki tuberkuleza u krupnogo rogatogo skota]. Veterinariya. 1986; 6: 23–26. (in Russian)
12. Solodovnikov V. L. T- and B-systems in the context of tuberculosis in cattle and sheep [T- i V-sistemy pri tuberkuleze krupnogo rogatogo skota i ovec]: Author’s summary, Thesis of Candidate of Biological Sciences. М., 1983. 23 p. (in Russian)
13. Kolychev A. M., Kassich Yu. Ya., Martma O. V., et al. Tuberculosis of livestock [Tuberkulez sel’skohozyajstvennyh zhivotnyh]. Ed. by V. P. Shishkov, V. P. Urban. M.: Agropromizdat; 1991. 254 p. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Baratov M.O. Problems and prospects of bovine tuberculosis serological diagnosis. Veterinary Science Today. 2021;1(1):33-37. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2021-1-36-33-37