Characteristics of microbial contamination of animal raw materials and products in the Russian Federation from 2015 to 2018
https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2020-1-32-51-59
Abstract
To date, there is a whole system of legal documents, regulating food security issues in the Russian Federation. Monitoring of food quality and safety is performed on the federal level, on the level of the Russian Federation Subjects and on the municipal level based on the developed and adopted regulatory and methodical documents. The paper presents the analysis of ASSOL information system data related to microbial contamination of animal raw materials and products, collected within the following official activities: “Laboratory Testing within Official Monitoring of Food Safety and Quality” and “Laboratory Testing of Animal Raw Materials and Products, Feed and Biological Materials for the Purposes of Food Safety and Quality Assurance”. Microbiological test data were obtained from 37 Russian laboratories, subordinate to the Rosselkhoznadzor, within 2015–2018. The analysis performed showed that the maximum number of tests was performed for the following pathogenic microorganisms: Salmonella bacteria (29.5% within official monitoring and 26.8% within official programme). The highest number of non-compliances within monitoring was revealed when testing for total viable count (total mesophilic anaerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms) – 14.8% and Coliforms – 8.98%; within the official programme most violations were related to yeast (18.8%), yeasts and molds (18.5%) and TVC (12.4%). The parameters, showing less than 1% of positives within official programme testing, were identified. They include Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Proteus bacteria and sulphite-reducing clostridia. The necessity in further tests for safety and quality of animal raw materials and products in the Russian Federation was justified.
About the Authors
I. V. BorodkinaRussian Federation
Inna V. Borodkina, Post-Graduate Student, Head of the Sector
295494, Simferopol city, set. of Komsomolskoye, st. Shosseinaya, 21А
N. B. Shadrova
Russian Federation
Natalya B. Shadrova, Candidate of Science (Biology), Head of Microbiology Laboratory
VladimirO. V. Pruntova
Russian Federation
Olga V. Pruntova, Doctor of Science (Biology), Professor, Chief Expert of the Information and Analysis Centre
VladimirO. I. Ruchnova
Russian Federation
Olga I. Ruchnova, Candidate of Science (Veterinary Medicine), Leading Researcher of the Department for Research Coordination
VladimirYe. S. Yerofeeva
Russian Federation
Yelena S. Yerofeeva, Post-Graduate Student, Head of Food Safety Laboratory
Simferopol cityS. I. Danilchenko
Russian Federation
Sergey I. Danilchenko, Candidate of Science (Veterinary Medicine), Head of Laboratory and Diagnostic Centre
Simferopol cityS. G. Yerofeev
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Yerofeev, Candidate of Science (Veterinary Medicine), Head of the Unit of Interaction
Simferopol cityReferences
1. Sedik D., Ulbricht C., Dzhamankulov N. Control system food safety in the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Trade policy. 2016; 2 (6): 41–83. eLIBRARY ID: 29392941. (in Russian)
2. Tolstova E. G. HACCP system as a methodological basis to provide foodstuff safety. Vestnik BGAU. 2014; 1 (29): 130–133. eLIBRARY ID: 21455263. (in Russian)
3. Dimitriev A. D., Trifonova A. Yu., Andreeva M. G. Study of HACCP principle implementation in catering industry [Issledovanie realizacii principov HASSP v sisteme industrii pitaniya]. Tendencii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2018; 43-8: 21–24. DOI: 10.18411/lj-10-2018-185. (in Russian)
4. Tikhonov B. B., Tikhonova N. A. Problems of implementation of quality management systems and HACCP at the Russian companies. Effective managements systems – strategies of success. 2014; 1 (4):62. eLIBRARY ID: 23386009. (in Russian)
5. Dimitriev A. D., Ezhkova G. O., Dimitriev D. A. Food quality management based on HACCP principles in public catering [Upravlenie kachestvom pishchevoj produkcii na principah HASSP v sisteme obshchestvennogo pitaniya]: study guide. Kazan: KNITU; 2017. 156. (in Russian)
6. Ualiulla B., Bortanova Zh., Mikhamedieva M., Uazhanova R. Examination and analysis of EU legislation on food safety: Regulation No. 852/2004 on food hygiene [Rassmotrenie i izuchenie zakonodatel’stva ES o bezopasnosti produktov pitaniya: Reglament № 852/2004 po gigiene pishchevyh produktov]. International Journal of Experimental Education. 2017; 4-1: 33–35. eLIBRARY ID: 28939412. (in Russian)
7. Campylobacter. World Health Organization (WHO). Published on 23.01.2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/campylobacter.
8. Ivanova O. Ye. Veterinary and sanitary assessment and improvement of techniques for detection and identification of Campylobacter bacteria in poultry meat [Veterinarno-sanitarnaya ocenka i sovershenstvovanie metodov detekcii i identifikacii bakterij roda Campylobacter v myase pticy]: abstract of the Candidate’s thesis (Veterinary Medicine). M.; 2017. 26. Available at: https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01006658614#?page=1. (in Russian)
9. Coker A. O., Isokephi R. D., Thomas B. N., Amisu K. O., Obi C. L. Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002; 8 (3): 237–244. DOI: 10.3201/eid0803.010233.
10. Oberhelman R. A., Taylor D. N. Campylobacter infections in developing countries. In: Campylobacter (2nd ed.). eds. I. Nachamkin, M. J. Blaser. Washington: ASM Press; 2000; 139–153.
11. Borodkina I. V., Shadrova N. B., Pruntova O. V., Danilchenko S. I. Analysis of microbial contamination of products of animal and plant origin according to the information of the RASFF system in the period from 2013 to 2017. Transactions of Taurida Agricultural Science. 2019; 18 (181): 84–93. eLIBRARY ID: 38528937. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Borodkina I.V., Shadrova N.B., Pruntova O.V., Ruchnova O.I., Yerofeeva Ye.S., Danilchenko S.I., Yerofeev S.G. Characteristics of microbial contamination of animal raw materials and products in the Russian Federation from 2015 to 2018. Veterinary Science Today. 2020;(1):51-59. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2020-1-32-51-59