<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">veterinary</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Veterinary Science Today</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Ветеринария сегодня</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2304-196X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6959</issn><publisher><publisher-name>"Veinard"</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-3-242-247</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">veterinary-844</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES | AVIAN DISEASES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ | БОЛЕЗНИ ПТИЦ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Effective measures to control eimeriosis in poultry  in the Republic of Dagestan</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Эффективные меры борьбы с эймериозами птиц  в условиях Республики Дагестан</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-3654</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дагаева</surname><given-names>А. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Dagaeva</surname><given-names>A. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> Дагаева Асият Багаутдиновна - научный сотрудник лаборатории по изучению инвазионных болезней сельскохозяйственных животных и птиц </p><p>ул. Дахадаева, 88, г. Махачкала, 367000, Республика Дагестан</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Asiyat  B.  Dagaeva - Researcher, Laboratory for the Study of Invasive Diseases of Farm Animals and Poultry</p><p>88 Dakhadaeva str., Makhachkala 367000, Republic of Dagestan</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nos4561@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-9271</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Махиева</surname><given-names>Б. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Makhieva</surname><given-names>B. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Махиева Баху Магомедовна - канд. вет. наук, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории по изучению инвазионных болезней сельскохозяйственных животных и птиц </p><p>ул. Дахадаева, 88, г. Махачкала, 367000, Республика Дагестан</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Bakhu M. Makhieva - Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Senior Researcher, Laboratory for the Study of Invasive Diseases of Farm Animals and Poultry</p><p>88 Dakhadaeva str., Makhachkala 367000, Republic of Dagestan</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">bahumahieva66@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Прикаспийский зональный научно-исследовательский ветеринарный институт – филиал ФГБНУ «Федеральный аграрный научный центр Республики Дагестан» (Прикаспийский зональный НИВИ – филиал ФГБНУ «ФАНЦ РД»)</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Caspian Regional Research Veterinary Institute – Branch of Dagestan Agriculture Science Center</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>242</fpage><lpage>247</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Dagaeva A.B., Makhieva B.M., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Дагаева А.Б., Махиева Б.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Dagaeva A.B., Makhieva B.M.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/844">https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/844</self-uri><abstract><p>The most common disease of young poultry in commercial farms of the Russian Caspian region is eimeriosis. In most cases, after convalescence from coccidiosis caused by one of Eimeria species poultry remains susceptible to other species. This parasite has a very short life cycle and immense reproductive capacity that is why it can cause large-scale outbreaks of the disease in commercial poultry houses. To control avian eimeriosis, various coccidiostats are used in combination with probiotics and vitamins. Frequent and long-term use of the same drugs against this infection can potentially result in the emergence of resistant Eimeria populations. This suggests that this coccidiosis control requires rotation of eimeriocidal drugs. Studies on eimeriosis prevalence were performed in the laboratory of the Caspian Regional Research Veterinary Institute and in different poultry farms of the Republic of Dagestan. Swabs of the floor, litter, equipment, droppings, feedstuffs, cecum smears from dead poultry were used for testing. High infection rate with eimerias was established in floor-housed poultry in the plain and piedmont zones of the Republic (Khasavyurtovsky and Karabudakhkentsky raions), where the infection rates were 81.6 and 82.4%, respectively. In batter-cage system poultry farms of the mountain and mountain valley zones (Khunzakhsky and Gergebilsky raions) the infection rates were significantly lower – 61.2 and 58.0%, respectively. The comparative efficacy study of two eimeriocidal drugs showed that “Robenidine”, used daily from the first day of life during the entire rearing period at a dose of 33 g per 1 ton of feedstuffs controls coccidiosis in poultry. At the same time, the survival rate of the experimental young poultry during the observation period was 98.0% compared with “Sarucoxum 12%” group (96.7%).</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Самым распространенным заболеванием молодняка на птицефабриках промышленного типа в Прикаспийском регионе России является эймериоз (кокцидиоз). В большинстве случаев птица, которая переболела кокцидиозом, вызванным одним видом эймерий, остается восприимчива и к другим видам возбудителя. У данного паразита очень короткий жизненный цикл и огромная репродуктивная способность, вследствие чего в птичниках промышленного типа случаются массовые вспышки заболевания. Для борьбы с эймериозами птиц применяют различные кокцидиоцидные препараты в сочетании с пробиотиками и витаминами. Частое и долгосрочное использование одних и тех же средств лечения данной инвазии приводит к возникновению устойчивых популяций эймерий. Это говорит о том, что при борьбе с этим паразитозом важно чередовать эймериоцидные препараты. Исследования по изучению распространения эймериоза проводили на базе лаборатории Прикаспийского зонального научно-исследовательского ветеринарного института и в птицеводческих хозяйствах Республики Дагестан различного типа. Материалом для исследований служили соскобы с пола, подстилки, инвентаря; помет; корма; мазки-отпечатки слепых отростков кишечника павшей птицы. Выявлена высокая зараженность эймериями птиц, выращиваемых в условиях напольного содержания в равнинной и предгорной зонах республики (Хасавюртовский и Карабудахкентский районы), где уровень инвазирования составил 81,6 и 82,4% соответственно. В птицеводческих хозяйствах горной зоны и зоны горных долин (Хунзахский и Гергебильский районы) при клеточном выращивании степень поражения птиц была значительно ниже – 61,2 и 58,0% соответственно. При сравнительном изучении эффективности двух эймериоцидных препаратов установлено, что «Робенидин» ежедневно с первого дня жизни в течение всего периода выращивания в дозе 33 г на 1 тонну корма санирует организм птицы от паразитов. При этом выживаемость подопытного молодняка птицы за период наблюдения составила 98,0% по сравнению с группой, где применяли «Сарукокс 12%» (96,7%).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>цыплята-бройлеры</kwd><kwd>эймериоз</kwd><kwd>ооцисты</kwd><kwd>эймерии</kwd><kwd>эймериоцидные препараты</kwd><kwd>«Робенидин»</kwd><kwd>«Сарукокс 12%»</kwd><kwd>эффективность</kwd><kwd>интенсивность инвазии</kwd><kwd>слепые отростки кишечника</kwd><kwd>помет</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>broilers</kwd><kwd>eimeriosis</kwd><kwd>oocysts</kwd><kwd>eimerias</kwd><kwd>eimeriocidal drugs</kwd><kwd>“Robenidine”</kwd><kwd>“Sarucoxum 12%”</kwd><kwd>efficacy</kwd><kwd>infection rate</kwd><kwd>ceca</kwd><kwd>droppings</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Минобрнауки РФ в рамках Программы фундаментальных научных исследований  государственных академий наук по направлению «Молекулярно-биологические и нанобиотехнологические методы созданиябиопрепаратов нового  поколения, технологии и способы их применения с целью борьбы с особо опасными инфекционными, паразитарными и незаразными болезнями  животных».</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>The most common disease of young poultry in commercial farms of the Russian Caspian region is eimeriosis (coccidiosis) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit1">1</xref>].</p><p>The scientists point out that eimeriosis mainly affects young poultry (10 day – 3-month old) and attribute this to underdeveloped immunity [2-6].</p><p>In most cases, after convalescence from coccidiosis caused by one of Eimeria species poultry remains susceptible to other species. This parasite has a very short life cycle and immense reproductive capacity that is why it can cause large-scale outbreaks of the disease in commercial poultry houses [6-9].</p><p>Many authors describe the enormous damage caused to poultry farming by poultry deaths, reduced weight gain and meat production [10-13].</p><p>To control avian eimeriosis, various coccidiostats are used in combination with probiotics and vitamins [14-17].</p><p>The peak incidence in poultry is most often observed during warm and humid periods of the year (spring and late autumn).</p><p>The scientists note that 4–10 Eimeria species can infect poultry at the same time, which significantly complicates this disease control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit9">9</xref>].</p><p>In recent years, co-infections with eimerias and cryptosporidias, salmonellas and colibacterias have been frequently reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit18">18</xref>].</p><p>Frequent and long-term use of the same drugs against this infection can potentially result in the emergence of resistant Eimeria populations. This suggests that control of this coccidiosis requires rotation of eimeriocidal drugs [19-21].</p><p>The aim of the research was to study eimeriosis prevalence in poultry farms of the Republic of Dagestan and the efficacy of “Robenidine” and “Sarucoxum 12%” by comparison.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>Commercial drugs “Robenidine” and “Sarucoxum 12%” were tested.</p><p>“Robenidine” has a coccidiostatic effect against the main species of avian coccidia (Eimeria necatrix, Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria brunetti, Eimeria maxima, Eimeria mivati), at the stage of first and second generation schizonts. “Robenidine” affects energy metabolism of coccidia cells and adversely affects the process of nuclear division which leads to the death of parasites.</p><p>“Sarucoxum 12%” contains salinomycin sodium, a polyether ionophore antibiotic. The drug disrupts the transport of sodium and potassium ions in the oocyst and leads to the death of coccidia at the stage of schizogony. It has an anticoccidial effect against all coccidia species of poultry and other livestock.</p><p>The experiments were performed in the laboratory of the Caspian Regional Research Veterinary Institute and commercial poultry farm AO “Poultry farm “Makhachkalinskaya”, as well as in other poultry farms of the region.</p><p>Swabs of the floor, litter, equipment, droppings, feedstuffs, cecum smears from dead poultry were used for testing.</p><p>Laboratory tests to establish the diagnosis and Eimeria infection rate in poultry were carried out in accordance with GOST 25383-82 (ST SEV 2547-80) “Domestic animals. Methods of laboratory diagnostics of coccidiosis”1.</p><p>To conduct an experiment in a commercial poultry farm of AO “Poultry farm Makhachkalinskaya”, 3 groups of chicks were formed: 2 test groups and 1 control group (150 chicks per group).</p><p>Test group 1 broilers received “Robenidine” daily from the first day of life during the entire rearing period at a dose of 33 g per 1 ton of feedstuffs. The drug was removed from the diet 5 days before slaughter. Test group 2 was treated with “Sarucoxum 12%” at a dose of 7 mg/kg, which is equivalent to 1 mL per 1 liter of drinking water given within 48 hours. Control chicks were not treated.</p><p>Poultry were observed during the entire period of the experiment. Treated chicks were tested for oocysts on days 16, 26, 36, 48.</p><p>The experiments on animals were carried out in accordance with GOST 33215-2014, adopted by the Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certification, as well as in accordance with the requirements of the Helsinki Declaration (2000) and Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union dated 09/22/2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.</p><p>The intensive efficacy (IE) of the drugs was determined by coproscopy for Eimeria oocysts in ceca and droppings.</p><p>The effect of the drugs on poultry performance was evaluated by clinical signs manifested; oocyst index and mortality rates caused by eimeriosis, as well as weight gains in control and test groups.</p><p>A McMaster or VIGIS counting chamber was used to count oocysts in 1 g of droppings.</p><p>The results were statistically processed using Biometrics software.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title><p>The eimeriosis situation in different altitudinal zones of the region was studied at the poultry farms and small-scale farms practicing floor and battery cage system rearing, located in Khasavyurtovsky (plain zone), Karabudakhkentsky (piedmont zone), Khunzakhsky (mountain zone) and Gergebilsky (intermontane valley zone) raions of the Republic.</p><p>986 carcasses of dead and killed poultry were examined, including 254 birds subjected to post-mortem examination, and 986 birds subjected to microscopy. There were 726 positive results which is 73.6% (Table 1).</p><p>In the plain and piedmont zones of the Republic (Khasavyurtovsky and Karabudakhkentsy raions), a high Eimeria infection rate in floor-housed poultry was revealed. The prevalence was 81.6 and 82.4%, respectively.</p><p>A completely different picture is observed in the cage-housed poultry at the farms of the mountain zone and intermontane valley zone (Khunzakhsky and Gergebilsky raions) infection, where the prevalence of infection was 61.2 and 58.0%, respectively.</p><p>The laboratory tests revealed eimerias in ceca, duodena and droppings of broilers (Table 2).</p><p>According to the literature data the morphology of the eimerias detected in pathological samples (droppings, ceca and duodena) was consistent with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria maxima, Eimeria mitis, Eimeria acervulina species.</p><p>To control avian eimeriosis successfully, it is necessary to conduct constant research and development of modern highly effective eimeriocidal drugs, therefore, one of the stages of the study was a comparative efficacy study of “Robenidine” and “Sarucoxum 12%” against spontaneous eimeriosis in broilers in a commercial poultry farm (battery cage system) of AO “Poultry farm “Makhachkalinskaya” (Table 3 and 4).</p><p>It was found that in the test groups, after the use of “Robenidine” and “Sarucoxum 12%” in therapeutic doses, 3 and 5 chicks respectively died during the entire observation period (48 days). Thus, the survival rate of poultry in test groups was 98.0 and 96.7%, respectively. In the control group, the survival rate of broiler chicks was significantly lower – 60.7%.</p><p>The post-mortem examination of dead chicks of groups 1 and 2 revealed no lesions characteristic of eimeriosis in the internal organs and intestines.</p><p>Microscopy of cecum smears from dead birds of group 1 demonstrated no Eimeria oocysts, whereas single oocysts were found in group 2 broiler chicks (4–5 oocysts in a single field of view).</p><p>The intensive efficacy of “Robenidine” treatment was 98.0%, of “Sarucoxum 12%” – 96.7%. Thus, the therapeutic efficacy of “Robenidine” turned out to be higher than “Sarucoxum 12%”.</p><p>The average daily gain in broiler chicks during the rearing period (48 days) in test groups 1 and 2 was 53 and 48 g, respectively, and feed consumption per 1 kg of live weight gain was 1.95 and 2.1 kg.</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><caption><p>Table 1</p><p>Prevalence of eimerioses in poultry in the raions and different attitudinal zones of the Republic of Dagestan</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Raions and zones</td><td>Tested for eimeriosis</td></tr><tr><td>No.of samples</td><td>subjected to post-mortem examination</td><td>subjectedto microscopy</td><td>positive samplesdetected</td><td>%</td></tr><tr><td>Khasavyurtovsky
(plain zone)</td><td>364</td><td>104</td><td>364</td><td>297</td><td>81.6</td></tr><tr><td>Karabudakhkentsky
(piedmont zone)</td><td>256</td><td>84</td><td>256</td><td>211</td><td>82.4</td></tr><tr><td>Khunzakhsky
(mountain zone)</td><td>178</td><td>34</td><td>178</td><td>109</td><td>61.2</td></tr><tr><td>Gergebilsky
(intermontane valley zone)</td><td>188</td><td>32</td><td>188</td><td>109</td><td>58.0</td></tr><tr><td>TOTAL</td><td>986</td><td>254</td><td>986</td><td>726</td><td>73.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2"><caption><p>Table 2</p><p>The results of testing of broiler intestines and droppings for eimerias</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Raions and zones</td><td>No. of samples</td><td>Eimeria oocysts detected (No. seen in a single field of view)</td></tr><tr><td>in cecum</td><td>in droppings</td><td>in duodenum</td></tr><tr><td>Khasavyurtovsky (plain zone)</td><td>104</td><td>54–56</td><td>8–10</td><td>7–9</td></tr><tr><td>Karabudakhkentsky (piedmont zone)</td><td>84</td><td>24–26</td><td>4–5</td><td>4–6</td></tr><tr><td>Khunzakhsky (mountain zone)</td><td>34</td><td>11–12</td><td>2–3</td><td>1–2</td></tr><tr><td>Gergebilsky (intermontane valley zone)</td><td>32</td><td>6–8</td><td>2–3</td><td>1–2</td></tr><tr><td>TOTAL</td><td>254</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-3"><caption><p>Table 3</p><p>Design of testing in cage-housed ROSS 308 broilers</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Groups</td><td>Drug</td><td>Number of chicks</td><td>Dose and course of treatment</td></tr><tr><td>Group 1</td><td>“Robenidine”</td><td>150</td><td>Daily from the first day of life during the entire rearing period at a dose of 33 g per 1 tonof feedstuffs. The drug was removed from the diet 5 days before slaughter</td></tr><tr><td>Group 2</td><td>“Sarucoxum 12%”</td><td>150</td><td>Given with water during 48 hours at a dose of 7 mg/kg,which is equivalent to 1 mL per 1 liter of drinking water</td></tr><tr><td>Control</td><td>−</td><td>150</td><td>−</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-4"><caption><p>Table 4</p><p>The efficacy of eimeriocidal drugs against spontaneous eimeriosis in broilers</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Indicator</td><td>Control</td><td>Test groups</td></tr><tr><td>“Robenidine”</td><td>“Sarucoxum 12%”</td></tr><tr><td>Before treatment</td></tr><tr><td>No. of chicks per group</td><td>150</td><td>150</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>Age of chicks, days</td><td>15</td><td>15</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>The average weight of 1 chicken at the beginning of the study, g</td><td>426</td><td>432</td><td>443</td></tr><tr><td>The number of oocysts in the tested samples (mean value), No. in a single FoV</td></tr><tr><td>In cecum</td><td>40.3 ± 5.3</td><td>36.7 ± 1.9</td><td>32.8 ± 2.3</td></tr><tr><td>In 20 samples of droppings</td><td>33.7 ± 1.9</td><td>29.3 ± 2.1</td><td>24.6 ± 2.3</td></tr><tr><td>After treatment</td></tr><tr><td>Chickens died within 48 days (%)</td><td>59 (39.3%)</td><td>3 (2.0%)</td><td>5 (3.3%)</td></tr><tr><td>The number of oocysts in the tested samples (mean value), No. in a single FoV</td></tr><tr><td>In cecum</td><td>43.6 ± 4.4</td><td>–</td><td>5.5 ± 1.4</td></tr><tr><td>In 20 samples of droppings</td><td>40.3 ± 3.8</td><td>–</td><td>4.9 ± 1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Intensive efficacy, %</td><td>−</td><td>98.0</td><td>96.7</td></tr><tr><td>Survival rate of chicks within 48 days, %</td><td>60.7</td><td>98.0</td><td>96.7</td></tr><tr><td>Average daily gain within 48 days, g</td><td>44</td><td>53</td><td>48</td></tr><tr><td>Feed consumption per 1 kg of weight gain within 48 days, kg</td><td>2.24</td><td>1.95</td><td>2.10</td></tr><tr><td>Live weight at slaughter, g</td><td>2,536</td><td>2,978</td><td>2,729</td></tr><tr><td>No. in a single FoV – number of oocysts in a single field of view.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>Monitoring tests performed in the plain and piedmont zones of the Republic (Khasavyurtovsky and Karabudakhkentsy raions) revealed a high Eimeria infection rate in floor-housed poultry. The prevalence was 81.6 and 82.4%, respectively.</p><p>The prevalence of infection in cage-housed poultry in the mountain zone and intermontane valley zone (Khunzakhsky and Gergebilsky raions) was 61.2 and 58.0%, respectively.</p><p>Morphology study of Eimeria detected in pathological samples (droppings, ceca and duodena) allowed to identify them as Eimeria tenella, Eimeria maxima, Eimeria mitis, Eimeria acervulina.</p><p>As a result of a comparative assessment of eimeriocidal drugs in the setting of spontaneous eimeriosis in broiler chicks in the commercial poultry farm AO “Poultry farm “Makhachkalinskaya”, 98.0% “Robenidine” effectiveness was established.</p><p>Daily treatment of chicks with “Robenidine” from the first day of life during the entire rearing period at a dose of 33 g per 1 ton of feedstuffs and removing the drug the diet 5 days before slaughter keeps the poultry free from the parasites. The survival rate of the young poultry under study during the observation period was 98.0%.</p><p>Thus, the therapeutic efficacy of “Robenidine” turned out to be higher than “Sarucoxum 12%”. The commercial drug “Robenidine” can be used in poultry farms of the Republic of Dagestan for treating eimeriosis in broilers.</p><p>1. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200025474?ysclid=lwmb1ge0n7566471140 (in Russ.)
</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бакриева Р. М., Гаджимурадова З. Т., Дагаева А. Б. Эпизоотическая ситуация по эймериозам в птицеводческих хозяйствах в условиях Республики Дагестан. Актуальные задачи ветеринарии, медицины и биотехнологии в современных условиях и способы их решения: материалы региональной научно-практической межвузовской конференции (Самара, 16 мая 2013 г.). Самара: ГНУ Самарская научноисследовательская ветеринарная станция РАСХН; 2013; 34–37. https://elibrary.ru/wxhzyd</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakrieva R. M., Gadjimuradova Z. T., Dagaeva A. B. Epizooticheskaya situatsiya po eimeriozam v ptitsevodcheskikh khozyaistvakh v usloviyakh Respubliki Dagestan = Eimeriosis situation in poultry farms of the Republic of Dagestan. Aktual’nye zadachi veterinarii, meditsiny i biotekhnologii v sovremennykh usloviyakh i sposoby ikh resheniya: materialy regional’noi nauchno-prakticheskoi mezhvuzovskoi konferentsii (Samara, 16 maya 2013 g.) = Cruical tasks of veterinary medicine, human medicine and biotechnology and ways to solve them: proceedings of regional scientific and practical conference (Samara, May 16, 2013). Samara: GSI Samara Research Veterinmary Stattion under RAAS; 2013; 34–37. https://elibrary.ru/wxhzyd (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mesa-Pineda C., Navarro-Ruíz J. L., López-Osorio S., Chaparro-Gutiérrez J. J., Gómez-Osorio L. M. Chicken coccidiosis: From the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease. Frontiersin Veterinary Science. 2021; 8:787653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.787653</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mesa-Pineda C., Navarro-Ruíz J. L., López-Osorio S., Chaparro-Gutiérrez J. J., Gómez-Osorio L. M. Chicken coccidiosis: From the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease. Frontiersin Veterinary Science. 2021; 8:787653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.787653</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гиззатуллин Р. Р. Клинико-морфологическая оценка эффективности соединения «Дегельм-14» при эймериозе кур: дис. ... канд. вет. наук. Н. Новгород; 2013. 196 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gizzatullin R. R. Clinical and morphological evaluation of “Degelm-14” efficacy against chicken eimeriosis: Author’s thesis for degree of Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine). N. Novgorod; 2013. 196 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бондаренко Л. А. Распространение эймериоза среди ремонтного молодняка кур мясо-яичной породы. Теория и практика борьбы с паразитарными болезнями. 2014; 15: 57–60. https://elibrary.ru/tcfxgj</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bondarenko L. A. Prevalence of Eimeria spp. infection among youngsters of meat-egg breed. Theory and Practice of Parasitic Disease Control. 2014; 15: 57–60. https://elibrary.ru/tcfxgj (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Качанова Е. О., Сафиуллин Р. Т. Распространение эймериозной инвазии у бройлеров и ремонтного молодняка кур яичной и мясо-яичной породы. Труды ВИЭВ. 2018; 80 (2): 177–182. https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-PRINT-2018-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kachanova E. O., Safiullin R. T. Distribution of eimeriosis invasion in broilers and maintenance youngsters of hens of egg and meat-egg breed. Proceedings of the VIEV. 2018; 80 (2): 177–182. https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-PRINT-2018-4 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">You M.-J. The comparative analysis of infection pattern and oocyst output in Eimeria tenella, E. maxima and E. acervulina in young broiler chicken. Veterinary World. 2014; 7 (7): 542–547. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">You M.-J. The comparative analysis of infection pattern and oocyst output in Eimeria tenella, E. maxima and E. acervulina in young broiler chicken. Veterinary World. 2014; 7 (7): 542–547. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Györke A., Pop L., Cozma V. Prevalence and distribution of Eimeria speciesin broiler chicken farms of different capacities. Parasite. 2013; 20:50. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2013052</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Györke A., Pop L., Cozma V. Prevalence and distribution of Eimeria speciesin broiler chicken farms of different capacities. Parasite. 2013; 20:50. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2013052</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сивкова А. С., Гагарин Е. М., Глазунова Л. А. Некоторые эпизоотологические особенности эймериоза у кур яичного направления продуктивности. АПК: инновационные технологии. 2020; (1): 6–12. https:// elibrary.ru/pigpgz</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sivkova A. S., Gagarin E. M., Glazunova L. A. Some epizootological features of eimeriosis in chickens in egg productivity. AIC: Innovative Technologies. 2020; (1): 6–12. https://elibrary.ru/pigpgz (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xu L., Xiang Q., Li M., Sun X., Lu M., Yan R., et al. Pathogenic effects of single or mixed infections of Eimeria mitis, Eimeria necatrix, and Eimeria tenella in chickens. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9 (12):657. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120657</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xu L., Xiang Q., Li M., Sun X., Lu M., Yan R., et al. Pathogenic effects of single or mixed infections of Eimeria mitis, Eimeria necatrix, and Eimeria tenella in chickens. Veterinary Sciences. 2022; 9 (12):657. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9120657</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haug A., Gjevre A. G., Skjerve E., Kaldhusdal M. A survey of the economic impact of subclinical Eimeria infections in broiler chickens in Norway. Avian Pathology. 2008; 37 (3): 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450802050705</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haug A., Gjevre A. G., Skjerve E., Kaldhusdal M. A survey of the economic impact of subclinical Eimeria infections in broiler chickens in Norway. Avian Pathology. 2008; 37  (3): 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450802050705</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blake D. P., Knox J., Dehaeck B., Huntington B., Rathinam T., Ravipati V., et al. Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Veterinary Research. 2020; 51 (1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-020-00837-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blake D.  P., Knox J., Dehaeck B., Huntington B., Rathinam T., Ravipati V., et al. Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Veterinary Research. 2020; 51 (1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-020-00837-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Забашта А. П. Усовершенствование лечебно-профилактических мероприятий при смешанных паразитозах кур в условиях Кубани: дис. … канд. вет. наук. Ставрополь; 2002. 197 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zabashta A. P. Improvement of therapeutic and prevention measures to control mixed parasitic infections of chickens in Kuban: Author’s thesisfor degree of Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine). Stavropol; 2002. 197 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blake D. P., Vrba V., Xia D., Jatau I. D., Spiro S., Nolan M. J., et al. Genetic and biological characterisation of three cryptic Eimeria operational taxonomic unitsthat infect chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). International Journal for Parasitology. 2021; 51 (8): 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.12.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blake D. P., Vrba V., Xia D., Jatau I. D., Spiro S., Nolan M. J., et al. Genetic and biological characterisation of three cryptic Eimeria operational taxonomic units that infect chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). InternationalJournal for Parasitology. 2021; 51 (8): 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.12.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Quiroz-Castañeda R. E., Dantán-González E. Control of avian coccidiosis: future and present natural alternatives. BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015:430610. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/43061</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Quiroz-Castañeda R. E., Dantán-González E. Control of avian coccidiosis: future and present natural alternatives. BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015:430610. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/430610</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Беспалова Н. С. Современные противопаразитарные средства в ветеринарии: учебное пособие. М.: КолосС; 2006. 192 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bespalova N. S. Modern anti-parasitic veterinary drugs: study guide. Moscow: KolosS; 2006. 192 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кашковская Л. М., Балышев А. В., Абрамов В. Е., Зубарев В. Н. Современный подход к борьбе с эймериозом цыплят-бройлеров. Ветеринария. 2019; (3): 31–33. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2019.22.3.31-34</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kashkovskaya L. M., Balyshev A. V., Abramov V. E., Zubarev V. N. A modern approach to fighting the eimeriosis of broilers. Veterinariya. 2019; (3): 31–33. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2019.22.3.31-34 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дагаева А. Б., Бакриева Р. М., Махиева Б. М. Эймериозы птиц: биология, распространение и меры борьбы в условиях Прикаспийского региона РФ. Российский паразитологический журнал. 2020; 14 (1): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.31016/1998-8435-2020-14-1-29-34</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dagayeva А. B., Bakrieva R. М., Makhieva B. М. Eimeriosisin poultry: Biology, spread and control measuresin the Caspian Sea Region of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Parasitology. 2020; 14 (1): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.31016/1998-8435-2020-14-1-29-34 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бахурец И. А., Фирсова Г. Д. Влияние ассоциаций энтеропатогенных микроорганизмов и простейших у птиц на тяжесть инфекционного процесса. Ветеринарная патология. 2013; (4): 31–35. https://elibrary.ru/rzbxad</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakhurets I. A., Firsova G. D. The influence of associations enteropathogenic microorganisms and protozoa on the heaviness infectious process at birds. Russian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 2013; (4): 31–35. https://elibrary.ru/rzbxad (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коротова Д. М., Ларионов С. В. Сравнительная эффективность отечественных препаратов при эймериозе цыплят-бройлеров. Актуальные вопросы сельскохозяйственной биологии. 2023; (2): 10–14. https://elibrary.ru/yjkvti</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korotova D. M., Larionov S. V. Comparative efficiency domestic preparations for eimeriosis of broiler chicken. Actual Issues in Agricultural Biology. 2023; (2): 10–14. https://elibrary.ru/yjkvti (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Асбаганова А. Р., Муллаярова И. Р. Пути лечения и профилактики эймериоза кур. Проблемы интенсивного развития животноводства и их решение: сборник научных трудов Международной научно-практической конференции студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых (Брянск, 25–26 марта 2021 г.). Брянск: Брянский ГАУ; 2021; 113–117. https://elibrary.ru/urzsxk</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Asbahanova A. R., Mullayarova I. R. Ways of treatment and prevention of chicken eimeriosis. Problemy intensivnogo razvitiya zhivotnovodstva i ikh reshenie: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh (Bryansk, 25–26 marta 2021 g.) = Challenges of intensive livestock production and ways to address them: proceedings of International scientific and practical conference for students, post-graduate students and early-career scientists (Bryansk, March 25–26, 2021). Bryansk: Bryansk State Agrarian University; 2021; 113–117. https://elibrary.ru/urzsxk (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peek H. W., Landman W. J. Coccidiosisin poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. Veterinary Quarterly. 2011; 31 (3): 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2011.605247</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peek H. W., Landman W. J. Coccidiosisin poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. Veterinary Quarterly. 2011; 31 (3): 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2011.605247</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
