<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">veterinary</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Veterinary Science Today</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Ветеринария сегодня</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2304-196X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6959</issn><publisher><publisher-name>"Veinard"</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-2-154-163</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">veterinary-814</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES | PRIMATE DISEASES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ | БОЛЕЗНИ ПРИМАТОВ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Gut microbiota and bacterial associations in monkeys with gastrointestinal diseases in the setting of helminth infestation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Кишечная микрофлора и бактериальные ассоциации на фоне гельминтозной инвазии при желудочно-кишечных заболеваниях у обезьян</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1574-8674</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Калашникова</surname><given-names>В. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kalashnikova</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Калашникова Виктория Алексеевна, канд. биол. наук, ведущий научный сотрудник лаборатории инфекционной патологии</p><p>ул. Мира, 177, с. Веселое, Адлерский район, г. Сочи, 354376, Краснодарский край </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Victoria A. Kalashnikova, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology</p><p>177 Mira str., Vesyoloye, Adlersky City District, Sochi 354376, Krasnodar Krai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">vikky.aw@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Егорова</surname><given-names>Т. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Egorova</surname><given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Егорова Татьяна Петровна, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории инфекционной патологии</p><p>ул. Мира, 177, с. Веселое, Адлерский район, г. Сочи, 354376, Краснодарский край</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Tat’yana P. Egorova, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology</p><p>177 Mira str., Vesyoloye, Adlersky City District, Sochi 354376, Krasnodar Krai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">egorova24.12@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6473-3237</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Демерчян</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Demerchyan</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Демерчян Алвард Варткесовна, научный сотрудник лаборатории инфекционной патологии</p><p>ул. Мира, 177, с. Веселое, Адлерский район, г. Сочи, 354376, Краснодарский край</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alvard V. Demerchyan, Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology</p><p>177 Mira str., Vesyoloye, Adlersky City District, Sochi 354376, Krasnodar Krai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">demerchyan71@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5799-4697</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Полякова</surname><given-names>В. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Polyakova</surname><given-names>V. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Полякова Вероника Игоревна, младший научный сотрудник лаборатории инфекционной патологии</p><p>ул. Мира, 177, с. Веселое, Адлерский район, г. Сочи, 354376, Краснодарский край</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Veronika I. Polyakova, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology</p><p>177 Mira str., Vesyoloye, Adlersky City District, Sochi 354376, Krasnodar Krai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">veronika-9509@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Леншина</surname><given-names>Я. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lenshina</surname><given-names>Y. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Леншина Яна Игоревна, аспирант, лаборант-исследователь лаборатории инфекционной патологии</p><p>ул. Мира, 177, с. Веселое, Адлерский район, г. Сочи, 354376, Краснодарский край</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yana I. Lenshina, Postgraduate Student, Research Assistant, Laboratory of Infectious Pathology</p><p>177 Mira str., Vesyoloye, Adlersky City District, Sochi 354376, Krasnodar Krai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">yanaberenda@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-7783</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ильязянц</surname><given-names>Д. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ilyazyants</surname><given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Ильязянц Давид Александрович, младший научный сотрудник лаборатории патологической анатомии</p><p>ул. Мира, 177, с. Веселое, Адлерский район, г. Сочи, 354376, Краснодарский край</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>David A. Ilyazyants, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Pathological Anatomy</p><p>177 Mira str., Vesyoloye, Adlersky City District, Sochi 354376, Krasnodar Krai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">mailbox290518@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3098-8104</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Аршба</surname><given-names>И. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Arshba</surname><given-names>I. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Аршба Илона Мурмановна, канд. биол. наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, и. о. начальника лаборатории инфекционной патологии</p><p>ул. Мира, 177, с. Веселое, Адлерский район, г. Сочи, 354376, Краснодарский край</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ilona M. Arshba, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Researcher, Acting Head of the Laboratory of Infectious Pathology</p><p>177 Mira str., Vesyoloye, Adlersky City District, Sochi 354376, Krasnodar Krai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">aim26@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Курчатовский комплекс медицинской приматологии ФГБУ «Национальный исследовательский центр «Курчатовский институт» (ККМП НИЦ «Курчатовский институт»)</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kurchatov Complex of Medical Primatology, National Research Centre ”Kurchatov Institute”</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>154</fpage><lpage>163</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Kalashnikova V.A., Egorova T.P., Demerchyan A.V., Polyakova V.I., Lenshina Y.I., Ilyazyants D.A., Arshba I.M., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Калашникова В.А., Егорова Т.П., Демерчян А.В., Полякова В.И., Леншина Я.И., Ильязянц Д.А., Аршба И.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kalashnikova V.A., Egorova T.P., Demerchyan A.V., Polyakova V.I., Lenshina Y.I., Ilyazyants D.A., Arshba I.M.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/814">https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/814</self-uri><abstract><p>One of the topical issues of current primatology is spontaneous pathology in monkeys, primarily gastrointestinal infections, which are the leading ones in the morbidity and mortality patterns of the animals raised in captivity. Gastrointestinal pathology in monkeys involves complicated infectious processes, most often of associative type, with the formation of various bacterial and parasitic associations. The study demonstrates the results of gastrointestinal disease and helminth infestation monitoring as well as of the microbial flora spectrum analysis in monkeys in 2017–2022. Mortality of monkeys due to gastrointestinal diseases in the specified period amounted to 60.5%. The postmortem study demonstrated that the leading position in this pathology pattern in monkeys was taken by gastroenterocolitis (62.5%), with dominated chronic atrophic gastroenterocolitis in the acute phase (53.9%). The analysis of the six-year trend in animal mortality showed that the percentage of gastrointestinal diseases remained approximately at the same level every year. Helminth infestations were detected in 22.0% of the diseased animals and in 30.2% of the dead ones. Trichocephalus trichiurus was found in 93.3% of the diseased and in 99.7% of the dead monkeys, Strongyloides sp. – in 12.2% of the diseased and in 3.3% of the dead animals. Helminths were detected as mono- and less often as mixed infestations. In the isolated microflora, the top position was taken by the representatives of genus Proteus. The percentage of pathogenic enterobacteria detections was low, and Shigella flexneri was the leader among them. In monkeys that died from gastrointestinal diseases without parasitic infestation, the pathogenic enterobacteria detection rate was 2 times higher than in the infested animals. The microorganisms were isolated as monocultures and in associations. The microorganisms were isolated as monocultures and in associations Proteus spp. were detected more often. Gastrointestinal diseases of helminth-bacterial etiology in monkeys require complex therapy of the animals.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Одна из актуальных проблем современной приматологии – спонтанная патология обезьян, в первую очередь желудочно-кишечные инфекции, являющиеся ведущими в структуре заболеваемости и смертности животных, разводимых в условиях неволи. Желудочно-кишечная патология обезьян представляет собой сложные инфекционные процессы, чаще всего протекающие по ассоциативному типу, с формированием разных бактериальных и паразитарных сочетаний. В исследовании представлены результаты мониторинга желудочно-кишечных заболеваний, гельминтозной инвазии и анализа спектра микрофлоры у обезьян, проведенных в течение 2017–2022 гг. Гибель обезьян от заболеваний желудочно-кишечного тракта в указанный период составила 60,5%. При постмортальном исследовании установлено, что в структуре данной патологии у обезьян лидирующая позиция принадлежит гастроэнтероколитам (62,5%), при этом доминировали хронические атрофические гастроэнтероколиты в стадии обострения (53,9%). Анализ динамики гибели животных в течение 6 лет показал, что процент заболеваний желудочно-кишечного тракта из года в год держится примерно на одном уровне. Гельминтозная инвазия выявлена у 22,0% больных и 30,2% погибших животных. Кишечные паразиты Trichocephalus trichiurus обнаружены у 93,3% больных и 99,7% погибших обезьян, Strongyloides sp. – у 12,2% больных и 3,3% погибших животных. Гельминты выявлены в моноинвазиях, реже – в полиинвазиях. Из выделенной микрофлоры первое место занимают представители рода Proteus. Процент выявления патогенных энтеробактерий низкий, но среди них лидирует Shigella flexneri. У погибших от желудочно-кишечных заболеваний обезьян без паразитарной инвазии частота обнаружения патогенных энтеробактерий в 2 раза выше, чем у инвазированных животных. Микроорганизмы были выделены в виде монокультур и в ассоциациях. Чаще выявляли сочетания представителей нормофлоры с Proteus spp. Желудочно-кишечные заболевания у обезьян гельминто-бактериальной этиологии требуют комплексной терапии животных.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>обезьяны</kwd><kwd>заболевания желудочно-кишечного тракта</kwd><kwd>патогенные и условно-патогенные бактерии</kwd><kwd>бактериальные ассоциации</kwd><kwd>гельминтозная инвазия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>monkeys</kwd><kwd>gastrointestinal diseases</kwd><kwd>pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria</kwd><kwd>bacterial associations</kwd><kwd>helminth infestation</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Работа выполнена за счет средств госбюджета, входит в раздел научных исследований «Разработка моделей наиболее значимых вирусных инфекций человека на лабораторных приматах с целью изучения нерешенных вопросов патогенеза и иммуногенеза, а также испытания разрабатываемых средств профилактики и лечения, включая изучение микробиома кишечника».</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The work was financed by the state budget, it is included in the research section “Development of models of the most significant human viral infections in laboratory primates in order to study unresolved issues of pathogenesis and immunogenesis, as well as to test the developed means of prevention and treatment, including study of the intestinal microbiome”.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Gut microbiota condition is one of the important factors of animal and human health. Microorganisms enter the digestive tract immediately after birth and play an important role in the animal’s life. The basis of the normal gut flora is known to consist of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, Escherichia coli with normal fermentation, enterococci. Studies show that changes in the quantitative and qualitative composition of the gut microbiota lead to impaired intestinal function and gastrointestinal (GI) diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit2">2</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit3">3</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit4">4</xref>]. Etiological agents of intestinal infections can be bacteria, viruses, protozoa, helminths, fungi. However, not only microbial concentration plays a significant role in the development of the intestinal diseases, but also associations of different types of microorganisms in which they enter into symbiosis or antagonism and express pathogenicity factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit6">6</xref>]. Helminths also change the quantitative and qualitative composition of the gut microbiota, forming microparasite community [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit9">9</xref>].</p><p>Monkeys are anatomically and physiologically similar to humans, and show natural susceptibility to many infectious diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit10">10</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit12">12</xref>]. Observation results demonstrate that monkeys, both in their natural habitat and in captivity, suffer from various diseases typical for other animals and humans. In the Adler apery of the Research Institute of Medical Primatology (now Kurchatov Complex of Medical Primatology, National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”) monkeys of different species are kept. According to our annual data, mortality of monkeys in more than half the cases is due to gastrointestinal diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit14">14</xref>]. Intestinal diseases of monkeys are complex infectious processes, most often of an associative type, with the formation of various bacteria and parasite combinations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit15">15</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit16">16</xref>]. Intestinal parasites infect various species of monkeys both in the wild and in captivity, causing serious diseases of the digestive tract and in some cases leading to animal death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit18">18</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit19">19</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit20">20</xref>]. According to foreign publications, nematodes are the most common helminths in monkeys kept in zoos, and they can be transmitted to humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit21">21</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit22">22</xref>]. In the foreign research publications, there is data about intestinal parasites isolated from primates kept in zoos and reserves or from free-living ones, but these data refer to particular species and small groups of monkeys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit23">23</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit24">24</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit25">25</xref>]. Moreover, these papers describe only the results of parasitology research.</p><p>The relevance of the presented work is determined by the fact that GI diseases are the major cause of the monkeys’ mortality in the apery. At the same time, intestinal parasitic infections and bacterial associations that form intestinal diseases in monkeys are still an understudied problem. Our previous studies demonstrated the circulation of protozoa and helminths in the monkeys in the apery and provided some data on the concomitant microbiota [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit15">15</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit16">16</xref>]. In this paper, we would like to focus on the gut microbiota of nematode-infested monkeys and on the features of bacterial associations during its formation.</p><p>The novelty of the work lies in the fact that our study was the first to report on the microbial landscape and bacterial associations in the setting of the invasion by intestinal parasites Trichocephalus trichiurus and Strongyloides sp. in non-human primates kept in captivity.</p><p>The aim of the study was to examine the structure of the gut microbiota of monkeys with intestinal diseases who died due to GI pathology in the setting of helminth infestation.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>The study object included 2,386 monkeys of six species of both sexes aged from 10 days to 35 years, which were kept in the apery. This number included 409 monkeys affected with intestinal diseases and 1,977 dead monkeys (Tables 1, 2).</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><caption><p>Table 1</p><p>Characteristics of tested monkeys (2017–2022)</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Monkey species</td><td>Diseased</td><td>Dead</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta)</td><td>172</td><td>731</td><td>903</td></tr><tr><td>Crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis)</td><td>152</td><td>514</td><td>666</td></tr><tr><td>Southern pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina)</td><td>41</td><td>45</td><td>86</td></tr><tr><td>Green monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus)</td><td>14</td><td>79</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>Anubis baboon (Papio anubis)</td><td>12</td><td>170</td><td>182</td></tr><tr><td>Hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas)</td><td>18</td><td>438</td><td>456</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>409</td><td>1,977</td><td>2,386</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2"><caption><p>Table 2</p><p>Number of tested dead monkeys (2017–2022)</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Monkey species</td><td>Number of monkeys</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td></tr><tr><td>Rhesus macaque</td><td>117</td><td>204</td><td>115</td><td>105</td><td>124</td><td>66</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>Crab-eating macaque</td><td>82</td><td>92</td><td>89</td><td>89</td><td>90</td><td>72</td><td>514</td></tr><tr><td>Southern pig-tailed macaque</td><td>6</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td>13</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>Green monkey</td><td>11</td><td>20</td><td>17</td><td>17</td><td>3</td><td>11</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>Anubis baboon</td><td>19</td><td>32</td><td>43</td><td>17</td><td>45</td><td>14</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>Hamadryas baboon</td><td>57</td><td>55</td><td>75</td><td>66</td><td>105</td><td>80</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>292</td><td>408</td><td>345</td><td>307</td><td>375</td><td>250</td><td>1,977</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The test samples included feces collected by a rectal smear from live monkeys, in case of dead animals they included the contents of three parts of the intestine (small intestine, caecum, rectum).</p><p>Bacteriological, biochemical and microscopic tests were carried out using routine practical methods1. The test material was aseptically collected and delivered to the laboratory, where initial inoculation on the diagnostic nutrient media was performed: Endo agar, Salmonella-Shigella agar, 5% blood agar, salt egg yolk agar, Yersinia selective agar, chromogenic Candida agar. The inoculates were cultivated in the thermostat at 37 °C for 24 hours, dishes with Yersinia selective agar – at 28 °C for 48 hours, dishes with Candida agar – at 24 °C for 48 hours. Isolation of pure cultures and their further identification were carried out according to generally accepted standards: examination of morphological and tinctorial properties (Gram staining of smears), hemolytic and lecithinase activity, and examination of the biochemical properties. The VITEK®2 Compact system (bioMérieux, France) was also used to determine the enterobacteria species. Slide agglutination method with specific sera was used for determination of the serovars of the isolated Shigella, Salmonella, Yersinia strains.</p><p>Parasite tests. Conventional microscopy procedure of native feces preparations was used to detect parasite infestation2. To identify helminth eggs, a small amount of feces from different places of the test portion was ground on a slide in a drop of 50% glycerol solution until a uniform transparent smear formation, covered with a coverslip and subjected to microscopy at 10 × 10 and 10 × 40 magnification. The extensity of helminth infestation was determined by the number of infected animals to the total number of the tested ones.</p><p>In the study of postmortem material, both microscopy of native preparations and macroscopic examination of the contents of the large intestine were used, as a result of which adult helminths were detected.</p><p>Statistical data processing and calculations were carried out using GraphPad Prism 8 software. To assess the significance of the differences in the frequency of helminth and bacteria detections in different monkey species in individual test groups the χ² goodness-of-fit test was used. All differences were interpreted as significant at p &lt; 0.05. The χ² test-for-trend was used to determine changes in frequency indicators depending on the test year. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine the statistical significance between helminth infestation extensity and monkey species.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title><p>From January 2017 to December 2022, 1,977 dead monkeys were tested; 1,196 (60.5%) of them demonstrated GI lesions during the necropsy (Table 3).</p><table-wrap id="table-3"><caption><p>Table 3</p><p>Characteristics of tested dead monkeys (2017–2022)</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Monkey species</td><td>Dead</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>with GI lesions</td><td>without GI lesions</td></tr><tr><td>Rhesus macaque</td><td>491</td><td>240</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>Crab-eating macaque</td><td>289</td><td>225</td><td>514</td></tr><tr><td>Southern pig-tailed macaque</td><td>21</td><td>24</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>Green monkey</td><td>52</td><td>27</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>Anubis baboon</td><td>101</td><td>69</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>Hamadryas baboon</td><td>242</td><td>196</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>1,196</td><td>781</td><td>1,977</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Gastrointestinal diseases were often accompanied with pneumonia, signs of cachexia, exicosis, and dystrophy of internal organs. Analysis of the animal mortality trend over 6 years demonstrated that the percentage of GI diseases remained approximately at the same level every year. As can be seen in Table 4, there was a tendency for a slight decrease in the number of monkeys died of GI diseases in 2022.</p><table-wrap id="table-4"><caption><p>Table 4</p><p>Trend in the monkeys’ mortality due to GI diseases, 2017–2022</p><p>* p &lt; 0.05 (χ² criterion – statistical difference of detections relative to monkey species).Arrows show the trend of changes in detection frequency over the years upon statistical significance of the test.</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Monkey species</td><td>Number of dead / %</td><td>Trend test*</td><td>Total / %</td></tr><tr><td>2017
(n = 292)</td><td>2018
(n = 408)</td><td>2019
(n = 345)</td><td>2020
(n = 307)</td><td>2021
(n = 375)</td><td>2022
(n = 250)</td></tr><tr><td>Rhesus macaque
(n = 731)</td><td>77/65.8</td><td>140/68.6</td><td>79/68.7</td><td>75/71.4</td><td>85/68.5</td><td>35/53.0</td><td>&lt; 0.0001
(↑↓)</td><td>491/67.2</td></tr><tr><td>Crab-eating macaque
(n = 514)</td><td>50/61.0</td><td>64/69.6</td><td>44/49.4</td><td>46/51.7</td><td>46/51.1</td><td>39/54.2</td><td>0.3145</td><td>289/56.2</td></tr><tr><td>Southern pig-tailed macaque
(n = 45)</td><td>5/83.3</td><td>3/60.0</td><td>3/50.0</td><td>5/38.5</td><td>3/37.5</td><td>2/28.6</td><td>0.5544</td><td>21/46.7</td></tr><tr><td>Green monkey
(n = 79)</td><td>9/81.8</td><td>8/40.0</td><td>11/64.7</td><td>15/88.2</td><td>2/66.7</td><td>7/63.6</td><td>0.5575</td><td>52/65.8</td></tr><tr><td>Anubis baboon
(n = 170)</td><td>10/52.6</td><td>12/37.5</td><td>25/58.1</td><td>12/70.6</td><td>34/75.6</td><td>8/57.1</td><td>0.0429
(↑↓)</td><td>101/59.4</td></tr><tr><td>Hamadryas baboon
(n = 438)</td><td>26/45.6</td><td>27/49.1</td><td>39/52.0</td><td>28/42.4</td><td>75/71.4</td><td>47/58.8</td><td>&lt; 0.0001
(↑↓)</td><td>242/55.3</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>177/60.6</td><td>254/62.3</td><td>201/58.3</td><td>181/59.0</td><td>245/65.3</td><td>138/55.2</td><td>–</td><td>1,196/60.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Postmortem examination of dead monkeys with GI lesions showed that in 35.3% of cases the GI lesions were in the form of enterocolitis (n = 422), in 62.5% – gastroenterocolitis (n = 748) and in 0.6% – gastritis (n = 7). Furthermore, in 0.6% of cases, the intestinal lesions were associated with infectious pathology, i.e. yersiniosis (n = 4), pseudotuberculosis (n = 3). Malignant neoplasms were reported in 1.0% of monkeys: gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 3), intestinal adenocarcinoma (n = 9). According to the data obtained, the GI diseases included dominating chronic atrophic gastroenterocolitis in the acute stage (53.9%), as well as chronic forms of enterocolitis. In case of stomach lesions, only chronic atrophic gastritis was reported in monkeys (Table 5).</p><table-wrap id="table-5"><caption><p>Table 5</p><p>GI diseases and lesions in monkeys (2017–2022)</p><p>CAGE – chronic atrophic gastroenterocolitis.</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>GI diseases</td><td>Number of animals / %</td><td>Lesions, number / %</td></tr><tr><td>acute</td><td>chronic atrophic</td><td>chronic with complications</td><td>CAGE (exacerbation)</td></tr><tr><td>Enterocolitis</td><td>422/35.3</td><td>25/5.9</td><td>368/87.2</td><td>29/6.9</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Gastroenterocolitis</td><td>748/62.5</td><td>25/3.3</td><td>69/9.2</td><td>9/1.2</td><td>645/86.2</td></tr><tr><td>Gastritis</td><td>7/0.6</td><td>0</td><td>7</td><td>0</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Infectious pathology</td><td>7/0.6</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Malignant neoplasms</td><td>12/1.0</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>1,196/100</td><td>50/4.2</td><td>444/37.1</td><td>38/3.2</td><td>645/53.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>As a result of parasite tests, helminth infestation was detected in 22.0% of the diseased monkeys and in 30.2% of the dead ones (Table 6). Two types of intestinal parasites were detected – Trichocephalus trichiurus and Strongyloides sp. The detection frequency of Trichocephalus trichiurus was 93.3% in the diseased monkeys (n = 84) and 99.7% in dead ones (n = 360). Strongyloides sp. were detected in 11 (12.2%) diseased and 12 (3.3%) dead animals. It was established that Strongyloides sp. mono-infestations were detected in 6 (6.7%) diseased and 1 (0.3%) dead monkeys, in other cases the helminths were detected as part of mixed infestations.</p><table-wrap id="table-6"><caption><p>Table 6</p><p>Helminth infestation extensity in monkeys (2017–2022)</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Monkey species</td><td>Diseased, infested / %</td><td>Dead monkeys with GI lesions, infested / %</td><td>p &lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td>Rhesus macaque</td><td>23/13.4</td><td>72/14.7</td><td>0.2497</td></tr><tr><td>Crab-eating macaque</td><td>14/9.2</td><td>10/3.5</td><td>&lt; 0.0001</td></tr><tr><td>Southern pig-tailed macaque</td><td>23/56.1</td><td>9/42.9</td><td>&lt; 0.0001</td></tr><tr><td>Green monkey</td><td>9/64.3</td><td>16/30.8</td><td>0.0662</td></tr><tr><td>Anubis baboon</td><td>8/66.7</td><td>73/72.3</td><td>0.0134</td></tr><tr><td>Hamadryas baboon</td><td>13/72.2</td><td>181/74.8</td><td>&lt; 0.0001</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>90/22.0</td><td>361/30.2</td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Table 6 demonstrates that in the crab-eating macaques with intestinal diseases the helminth detection frequency was higher than in the dead ones. As for Anubis baboons, Trichocephalus trichiurus was detected somewhat more often in the intestines of the dead animals. The frequency of infection with these parasites in the diseased and dead rhesus monkeys was almost the same. The same situation was reported in hamadryas baboons. Over the 6-year period, a small number of southern pig-tailed macaques and green monkeys were examined, however, the resulted data demonstrated that helminths were more often detected in the diseased animals of these species than in the dead ones. It was noted that Strongyloides sp. were found only in 3 species: rhesus macaques, green monkeys and hamadryas baboons. Thus, the results of the work showed that Trichocephalus trichiurus often infected non-human primates, and this coincided with the data of the foreign studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit26">26</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit27">27</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit28">28</xref>].</p><p>In 2017–2022, as a result of bacteriological tests of the feces of the diseased monkeys and intestinal contents of the dead ones, 1,468 microorganisms were detected and isolated gut microbiota was characterized by species diversity; 242 microorganisms were isolated from the feces of the diseased monkeys. The proportion of gram-negative gut microbiota was 80.6% (n = 195), gram-positive – 18.6% (n = 45), yeast-like fungi – 0.8% (n = 2). Representatives of the Enterobacteriaceae family were found in 43.5% of the diseased animals with pathogenic enterobacteria isolated in 1.9% of monkeys (n = 8) and opportunistic ones – in 41.6% (n = 170). Coccal microorganisms detected in 9.1% of animals included Staphylococcus spp. (6.6%), hemolytic Enterococcus spp. (2.2%), gram-positive diplococci (0.3%); 1,226 microorganisms were isolated from the dead monkeys, of which 95.4 % belonged to the gram-negative gut microbiota (n = 1,170), 2.8% belonged to the gram-positive gut microbiota (n = 34); the proportion of yeast-like fungi amounted to 1.8% (n = 22). In 96.0% of the dead animals, enterobacteria prevailed in the isolated gut microbiota (n = 1,148), of which the proportion of pathogenic ones amounted to 7.2% (n = 83), and opportunistic – to 92.8% (n = 1,065). Gram-positive cocci were found in the intestines of 1.5% of the dead monkeys (n = 18), while Staphylococcus spp. was detected in 0.7% of the animals, hemolytic Enterococcus spp. in 0.3%, and gram-positive diplococcus in 0.5%. Pathogenic and opportunistic gut microbiota was not detected in 282 dead and 220 diseased monkeys (23.6 and 53.8%, respectively). No bacterial growth was reported after inoculation of the samples from 3 diseased monkeys onto the nutrient media (0.7%).</p><p>The study results demonstrated that representatives of the genus Proteus dominated in the gut microbiota, their detection was three times more likely in the dead animals than in the diseased ones (55.0 and 16.4%, respectively).</p><p>Klebsiella spp., Staphylococcus spp., hemolytic Enterococcus spp., Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa were more often isolated from the diseased animals. Providencia spp., Enterobacter spp., Shigella flexneri, Morganella morganii, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp. were more often detected in the dead animals with GI diseases (Fig. 1).</p><fig id="fig-1"><caption><p>Fig. 1. Gut microbiota composition (or species diversity) in tested monkeys (2017–2022)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="veterinary-13-2-g001.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/veterinary/2023/1/DFcgMv7G3HxktHKthWSlEi8ZPfAjTqy07vq5t1nS.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><p>Analysis of the bacterial gut microbiota composition of monkeys indicated (Fig. 2) that non-helminth-infested animals with the highest frequency demonstrated Klebsiella spp. (7.8% – in the diseased animals, 5.5% – in the dead animals) and Enterobacter spp. (5.0% – in the diseased animals, 7.6% – in the dead animals). At the same time, Staphylococcus spp. (6.9%), hemolytic Escherichia coli (6.0%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.4%) were more often isolated from the diseased monkeys without parasite infestation, and Providencia spp. (5.6%), Citrobacter spp. (5.2%), Morganella morganii (4.4%) were most frequent in the dead parasite-free animals. As for helminth infested animals, Staphylococcus spp. (5.6%), Klebsiella spp. (4.5%), Bacillus spp. (4.5%) were most often detected in the diseased monkeys, and Providencia spp. (16.9%), Morganella morganii (6.7%) were found in the dead ones.</p><fig id="fig-2"><caption><p>Fig. 2. Effect of helminth infestation on the frequency of detection of the pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria in monkeys (2017–2022)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="veterinary-13-2-g002.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/veterinary/2023/1/MkydzoJ1Gore26oFVlrZUobiG7hUfiJKDrkTfCXO.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><p>It was noted that pathogenic enterobacteria were not detected in the helminth infested diseased animals, while in the helminth-free monkeys Shigella flexneri were isolated in 2.5% of cases (n = 8). In dead monkeys without helminth infestation, the frequency of the detection of pathogenic enterobacteria (Shigella flexneri, rare Salmonella serovars, Yersinia spp.) was 2 times higher than in the infested animals – 8.3% (n = 69) and 3.9% (n = 14), respectively. As a result, we assume that presence of the intestinal helminths can reduce the number of bacterial pathogens, occupying their niche in the gut biocenosis.</p><p>When analyzing the trend in the frequency of isolation of gut microbiota bacteria over six years, a consistently high annual percentage of Proteus spp. detections was established (Table 7).</p><table-wrap id="table-7"><caption><p>Table 7</p><p>Frequency of microbiota detection in GI diseased and dead monkeys (2017–2022)</p><p>* p &lt; 0.05 (χ 2 criterion – statistical difference of detections relative to monkey species).Arrows show the trend of changes in detection frequency over the years upon statistical significance of the test.</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Detected microorganisms</td><td>Quantity / %</td><td>Trend test*</td><td>Total / %</td></tr><tr><td>2017
(n = 177)</td><td>2018
(n = 254)</td><td>2019
(n = 201)</td><td>2020
(n = 181)</td><td>2021
(n = 245)</td><td>2022
(n = 138)</td></tr><tr><td>Citrobacter spp.</td><td>8/4.5</td><td>13/5.1</td><td>17/8.5</td><td>13/7.2</td><td>3/1.2</td><td>6/4.3</td><td>0.1953</td><td>60/5.0</td></tr><tr><td>Enterobacter spp.</td><td>7/4.0</td><td>15/5.9</td><td>14/7.0</td><td>17/9.4</td><td>20/8.2</td><td>20/14.5</td><td>0.0007
(↑)</td><td>93/7.8</td></tr><tr><td>Hemolytic Escherichia coli</td><td>9/5.1</td><td>8/3.1</td><td>8/4.0</td><td>13/7.2</td><td>14/5.7</td><td>12/8.7</td><td>0.0445
(↑↓)</td><td>64/5.4</td></tr><tr><td>Edwardsiella tarda</td><td>2/1.1</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>1/0.6</td><td>2/0.8</td><td>0</td><td>0.7845</td><td>5/0.4</td></tr><tr><td>Hafnia alvei</td><td>1/0.6</td><td>0</td><td>1/0.5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0.9010</td><td>2/0.2</td></tr><tr><td>Klebsiella spp.</td><td>11/6.2</td><td>13/5.1</td><td>27/13.4</td><td>24/13.3</td><td>4/1.6</td><td>8/5.8</td><td>0.3492</td><td>87/7.3</td></tr><tr><td>Morganella morganii</td><td>6/3.4</td><td>15/5.9</td><td>21/10.4</td><td>9/5.0</td><td>13/5.3</td><td>5/3.6</td><td>0.7308</td><td>69/5.8</td></tr><tr><td>Proteus spp.</td><td>86/48.6</td><td>168/66.1</td><td>121/60.2</td><td>103/56.9</td><td>171/69.8</td><td>77/55.8</td><td>0.0914</td><td>726/60.7</td></tr><tr><td>Providencia spp.</td><td>7/4.0</td><td>17/6.7</td><td>24/11.9</td><td>19/10.5</td><td>28/11.4</td><td>22/16.0</td><td>0.0002
(↑↓)</td><td>117/9.8</td></tr><tr><td>Salmonella of rare serovars</td><td>2/1.1</td><td>1/0.4</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0.0279
(↓)</td><td>3/0.3</td></tr><tr><td>Serratia spp.</td><td>1/0.6</td><td>1/0.4</td><td>1/0.5</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>10/7.2</td><td>0.0002
(↓↑)</td><td>13/1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Shigella flexneri</td><td>0</td><td>30/11.8</td><td>17/8.5</td><td>9/5.0</td><td>9/3.7</td><td>6/4.3</td><td>0.3172</td><td>71/5.9</td></tr><tr><td>Yersinia spp.</td><td>0</td><td>3/1.2</td><td>2/1.0</td><td>6/3.3</td><td>0</td><td>6/4.3</td><td>0.0330
(↓↑)</td><td>17/1.4</td></tr><tr><td>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</td><td>3/1.7</td><td>11/4.3</td><td>18/9.0</td><td>5/2.8</td><td>2/0.8</td><td>0</td><td>0.0186
(↑↓)</td><td>39/3.3</td></tr><tr><td>Bacillus spp.</td><td>0</td><td>6/2.4</td><td>10/5.0</td><td>3/1.7</td><td>0</td><td>5/3.6</td><td>0.7586</td><td>24/2.0</td></tr><tr><td>Hemolytic Enterococcus</td><td>7/4.0</td><td>1/0.4</td><td>0</td><td>1/0.6</td><td>2/0.8</td><td>2/1.4</td><td>0.1159</td><td>13/1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Staphylococcus spp.</td><td>4/2.3</td><td>3/1.2</td><td>11/5.5</td><td>1/0.6</td><td>12/4.9</td><td>4/2.9</td><td>0.2040</td><td>35/2.9</td></tr><tr><td>Gr+ diplococcus</td><td>1/0.6</td><td>5/2.0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0.0183
(↑↓)</td><td>6/0.5</td></tr><tr><td>Candida spp.</td><td>0</td><td>2/0.8</td><td>7/3.5</td><td>1/0.6</td><td>1/0.4</td><td>13/9.4</td><td>0.0001
(↑)</td><td>24/2.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Monitoring of the isolation of pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria in monkeys during 2017–2022 showed decrease in the frequency of detections of Klebsiella spp., Morganella morganii, Shigella spp., Pseudomonas spp., hemolytic Enterococcus spp. and increase in the frequency of detections of hemolytic Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp., Providencia spp., Serratia spp., Yersinia spp., yeast-like fungi of genus Candida. The decrease in the frequency of detections of Klebsiella spp. and Shigella flexneri might be associated with the use of Klebsiella phage and intestinal phage in the treatment of the animals. The highest percentage of detections of Citrobacter spp., Klebsiella spp., Morganella morganii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus spp., Bacillus spp., as compared with other years, was recorded in 2019.</p><p>The microorganisms were isolated both as mono-infestations and mixed infestations. Combinations of normal flora representatives with Proteus spp. were more often detected. Thus, in the diseased helminth-infested monkeys, the association of Escherichia coli + Proteus spp. was reported in 10.0% of cases, Escherichia coli + Enterococcus + Proteus spp. – in 4.5% of cases, Escherichia coli + Enterobacter spp. + Staphylococcus spp. – in 2.2% of cases. The highest percentage of simultaneous detections of Escherichia coli + Proteus spp. was also reported in the diseased helminth non-infested monkeys (9.4%). Combinations of Escherichia coli + Enterococcus spp. + Proteus spp. were reported in 4.1% of animals; bacterial associations of normal flora involving Escherichia coli + Enterococcus spp. + Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli + Enterococcus spp. + Staphylococcus spp. were detected in 3.5% of monkeys. Combinations of hemolytic Escherichia coli with Enterococcus spp. were reported in 2.5% of the animals, normal flora with Enterobacter spp. – in 2.2% of the cases. Associations of Escherichia coli + Serratia spp., Escherichia coli + Klebsiella spp., Escherichia coli + Enterococcus spp. + Pseudomonas aeruginosa were detected in 1.9% of the tested monkeys. The remaining variants of microbial associations were identified in rare cases.</p><p>In the dead monkeys the bacterial associations were more diverse. Thus, two-component associations were found in 53.0% of cases, three-component associations in 36.7%, four-component associations in 6.7%, five-component associations in 2.5% and six-component associations in 0.3% of cases. As in the diseased monkeys, Proteus spp. were most often detected concurrently with the normal flora in the dead monkeys (39%). Combinations involving normal flora with other opportunistic bacteria were much less common. Thus, co-growth of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. with the following bacteria were observed: Providencia spp. – in 3.5% of cases, Enterobacter spp. – in 2.9% of cases, Shigella flexneri – in 2.4% of cases, Citrobacter spp. – in 2.0% of cases, Morganella morganii – in 1.8% of cases, and Klebsiella spp. – in 1.3% of cases. In rare cases, Proteus spp. were isolated from the intestines of the dead animals together with Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Yersinia spp. without normal flora. The proportion of concurrent detections of Proteus spp. + Enterococcus spp. amounted to 1.0%.</p><p>Associations of yeast-like fungi of genus Candida in the intestines of the dead monkeys with one representative of the opportunistic microbiota were detected more often than with two ones (13 and 4 cases, respectively). Incidence of Candida spp. in association with Proteus spp. (11 monkeys) was higher than with Klebsiella spp. (3 monkeys) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2 monkeys). Therefore, combinations of pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria with yeast-like fungi in helminth-infested monkeys can aggravate the course of GI diseases due to the simultaneous involvement of pathogenicity factors of various microorganisms and parasites in the development of the infectious process.</p><p>As for the species composition of the microbiota, the following Enterobacteriaceae species were isolated from monkeys: Citrobacter freundii, C. diversus, C. amalonaticus, Enterobacter aerogenes, E. agglomerans, E. cloacae, E. gergoviae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, K. ozaenae, Proteus vulgaris, Pr. mirabilis, Pr. penneri, Providencia stuartii, P. rettgeri, P. alcalifaciens, Serratia marcences, S. odorifera; Enterococcus: Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium; Staphylococcus: Staphylococcus aureus, S. haemolyticus; as well as yeast-like fungi: Candida krusei, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis.</p><p>In conclusion, it can be noted that an important role in the development of GI diseases in monkeys is also played by weakened immunity due to various external factors, including stress, breaches of veterinary and sanitary, zootechnical and animal hygiene rules of feeding and keeping monkeys, which lead to normal gut microbiota disorders and opportunistic microbiota activation. Thus, GI diseases of helminth and bacterial etiology in monkeys require complex therapy. When keeping monkeys in captivity, there is a risk of parasite and pathogenic microorganism transmission to handlers due to human-animal contact. The detected Trichocephalus trichiurus and Strongyloides sp. are dangerous to humans, therefore it is necessary to comply with safety requirements when working with the diseased monkeys (regular deworming of animals, daily cleaning of cages and enclosures, and strict compliance with the personal hygiene rules). Knowledge about the parasitic and bacterial agents of spontaneous intestinal infections in monkeys is necessary for proper and safe breeding and keeping of these rare animals in captivity and for the practical use of monkeys in biomedical research.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title><p>The following conclusions were made based on the study results.</p><p>Contribution: Kalashnikova V. A. – selection and analysis of published literature on the subject, result interpretation, compilation of tables and diagrams, text preparation; Egorova T. P. – parasite tests, consultations on parasite test results; Demerchyan A. V. – bacteriological tests; Polyakova V. I. – bacteriological tests, statistical data processing; Lenshina Ya. I. – parasite tests; Ilyazyants D. A. – pathomorphologic examination (necropsy of monkeys, diagnosis); Arshba I. M. – bacteriological tests.</p><p>Вклад авторов: Калашникова В. А. – подбор и анализ литературных источников по теме, обработка результатов, составление таблиц и диаграмм, подготовка текста; Егорова Т. П. – проведение паразитологических исследований, консультирование по данным паразитологического исследования; Демерчян А. В. – проведение бактериологических исследований; Полякова В. И. – проведение бактериологических исследований, статистическая обработка данных; Леншина Я. И. – проведение паразитологических исследований; Ильязянц Д. А. – проведение патоморфологических исследований (вскрытие обезьян в прозектуре, постановка диагноза); Аршба И. М. – проведение бактериологических исследований.</p><p>1. Methodological guidelines for the microbiological diagnosis of the enterobacteria-induced diseases: approved by the Ministry of Health of the USSR on 17.12.1984 No. 04-723/3. https://base.garant.ru/71310616/?ysclid=lvdnbim4fh245607194
2. MUC 4.2.3145-13 Laboratory diagnostics of helminth and protozoa infestations: guidelines (approved by Chief State Medical Officer of the Russian Federation on 26 November 2013). https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200110752?ysclid=lvdnu57iyo743363677
</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Денисенко О. В., Гапон М. Н., Терновская Л. Н., Твердохлебова Т. И. Видовой состав условно-патогенной микрофлоры при дисбактериозах толстой кишки у жителей г. Ростова-на-Дону. Кубанский научный медицинский вестник. 2013; (1): 74–77. https://elibrary.ru/qccqbr</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Denisenko O. V., Gapon M. N., Ternovskay L. N., Tverdohlebova T. I. The species composition of conditionally pathogenic microflora at the large intestine dysbacterioses in residents of Rostov-on-Don. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2013; (1): 74–77. https://elibrary.ru/qccqbr (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Егорова С. А., Макарова М. А., Кафтырева Л. А. Этиологическая значимость условно патогенных энтеробактерий при острых кишечных заболеваниях и дисбиотических состояниях кишечника. Инфекция и иммунитет. 2011; 1 (2): 181–184. https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-2011-2-181-184</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Egorova S. A., Makarova M. A., Kaftyreva L. A. Opportunictic Enterobacteriacae as the cause of the acute diarrhea and gut disbiosis. Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity. 2011; 1 (2): 181–184. https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-2011-2-181-184 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванова Е. И., Колесникова Л. И., Рычкова Л. В., Савелькаева М. В., Немченко У. М., Ракова Е. Б. Микроэкологическая и ассоциативная структура кишечного биоценоза детей с функциональными нарушениями пищеварения. Бюллетень Восточно-Сибирского научного центра Сибирского отделения Российской академии медицинских наук. 2016; 1 (5): 22–25. https://elibrary.ru/wxbrkl</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanova E. I., Kolesnikova L. I., Rychkova L. V., Savelkaeva M. V., Nemchenko U. M., Rakova E. B. Microecological and associative structure of intestinal biocenosis in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Bulletin of the East Siberian Scientific Center of the Academy of Medical Sciences. 2016; 1 (5): 22–25. https://elibrary.ru/wxbrkl (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванова Е. И., Попкова С. М., Ракова Е. Б., Немченко У. М., Савелькаева М. В., Горбунова Е. Л. Изучение ассоциаций грибов рода Candida с некоторыми условно-патогенными микроорганизмами у лиц с функциональными нарушениями желудочно-кишечного тракта. Бюллетень Восточно-Сибирского научного центра Сибирского отделения Российской академии медицинских наук. 2011; (3-1): 196–198. https://elibrary.ru/oomfaj</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanova E. I., Popkova S. M., Rakova E. B., Nemchenko U. M., Savelkayeva M. V., Gorbunova E. L. Study of the genus Candida fungi associations with some opportunistic microorganisms in persons with functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Bulletin of the East Siberian Scientific Center of the Academy of Medical Sciences. 2011; (3-1): 196–198. https://elibrary.ru/oomfaj (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скуратович Е. Г. Микробиоценоз желудочно-кишечного тракта у молодняка лани европейской: возрастная динамика в течение первого года жизни. Проблемы биологии продуктивных животных. 2019; (3): 96–105. https://elibrary.ru/zpewab</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skuratovich E. G. Microbiocenosis of the gastrointestinal tract in young deer European: age dynamics for the first year of life. Problems of Productive Animal Biology. 2019; (3): 96–105. https://elibrary.ru/zpewab (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванюк В. П., Бобкова Г. Н. Изменения микробиоценоза кишечника свиней при гельминтозах. Вестник Брянской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2017; (1): 19–22. https://elibrary.ru/xvktpb</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanyuk V. P., Bobkovа G. N. Changes of microbiocenosis of pigs’ intestine with helminth infestation. Vestnik of the Bryansk State Agricultural Academy. 2017; (1): 19–22. https://elibrary.ru/xvktpb (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Катков А. Е., Романова Е. М. Особенности микробиоценоза кишечника на фоне стронгилоидной инвазии. Вестник Ульяновской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2007; (2): 61–66. https://elibrary.ru/rvweev</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katkov A. E., Romanova E. M. Osobennosti mikrobiotsenoza kishechnika na fone strongiloidnoi invazii = Intestinal microbiocenosis specifics in the setting of Strongyloides infestation. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2007; 2 (5): 61–66. https://elibrary.ru/rvweev (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Асланова М. М., Загайнова А. В., Кузнецова К. Ю., Ракова В. М., Сметанина Н. В. Изучение состава микробиоты кишечника по паразитологическим показателям у населения, относящегося к разным группам здоровья. Медицинская паразитология и паразитарные болезни. 2019; (2): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.33092/0025-8326mp2019.2.19-25</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aslanova M. M., Zagaynova A. V., Kuznetsova K. Y., Rakova V. M., Smetanina N. V. Study of the composition of the intestinal microbiota by parasitological indicators in the population belonging to different health groups. Medical Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases. 2019; (2): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.33092/0025-8326mp2019.2.19-25 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lee S. C., Tang M. S., Lim Y. A. L., Choy S. H., Kurtz Z. D., Cox L. M., et al. Helminth colonization is associated with increased diversity of the gut microbiota. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2014; 8 (5):e2880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002880</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee S. C., Tang M. S., Lim Y. A. L., Choy S. H., Kurtz Z. D., Cox L. M., et al. Helminth colonization is associated with increased diversity of the gut microbiota. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2014; 8 (5):e2880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002880</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лапин Б. А., Джикидзе Э. К., Фридман Э. П. Руководство по медицинской приматологии. М.: Медицина; 1987. 192 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lapin B. A., Dzhikidze E. K., Fridman E. P. Medical primatology guide. Moscow: Meditsina; 1987. 192 p. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blersch R., Archer C., Suleman E., Young C., Kindler D., Barrett L., Henzi S. P. Gastrointestinal parasites of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) in a high latitude, semi-arid region of South Africa. Journal of Parasitology. 2019; 105 (4): 630–637. https://doi.org/10.1645/19-19</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blersch R., Archer C., Suleman E., Young C., Kindler D., Barrett L., Henzi S. P. Gastrointestinal parasites of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) in a high latitude, semi-arid region of South Africa. Journal of Parasitology. 2019; 105 (4): 630–637. https://doi.org/10.1645/19-19</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Obanda V., Maingi N., Muchemi G., Ng’ang’a C. J., Angelone S., Archie E. A. Infection dynamics of gastrointestinal helminths in sympatric non-human primates, livestock and wild ruminants in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 14 (6):e0217929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217929</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Obanda V., Maingi N., Muchemi G., Ng’ang’a C. J., Angelone S., Archie E. A. Infection dynamics of gastrointestinal helminths in sympatric non-human primates, livestock and wild ruminants in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 14 (6):e0217929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217929</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Калашникова В. А. Детекция Campylobacter jejuni и Helicobacter pylori, ассоциированных с заболеваниями ЖКТ у обезьян. Ветеринарная патология. 2009; (4): 8–12. https://www.vetpat.ru/jour/article/view/1197</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kalashnikova V. A. Detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pylori associated with gastrointestinal diseases of monkeys. Russian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 2009; (4): 8–12. https://www.vetpat.ru/jour/article/view/1197 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ардашелия С. Н., Калашникова В. А., Джикидзе Э. К. Этиологическая структура бактериальных кишечных инфекций обезьян Адлерского питомника. Бюллетень экспериментальной биологии и медицины. 2011; 151 (6): 681–684. https://elibrary.ru/nxljfd</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ardasheliya S. N., Kalashnikova V. A., Dzhikidze E. K. Etiologic structure of bacterial intestinal infections in monkeys of Adler breeding center. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2011; 151 (6): 734–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-011-1428-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Егорова Т. П., Аршба И. М., Демерчян А. В., Леншина Я. И. Видовое разнообразие и структура паразитарно-бактериальных сочетаний у обезьян при кишечных патологиях. Ветеринария. 2023; (2): 31–35. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2023.26.2.31-35</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Egorova T. P., Arshba I. M., Demerchyan A. V., Lenshina Y. I. Species diversity and structure of parasitic-bacterial combinations in intestinal diseases of monkeys. Veterinariya. 2023; (2): 31–35. https://doi.org/10.30896/0042-4846.2023.26.2.31-35 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Егорова Т. П. Сведения о кишечных паразитах низших обезьян Адлерского питомника. Паразитология. 2010; 44 (4): 343–350. https://elibrary.ru/oizsdv</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Egorova T. P. Data on intestinal parasites of lower monkeys in the Adler apery. Parazitologiya. 2010; 44 (4): 343–350. https://elibrary.ru/oizsdv (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Adrus M., Zainudin R., Ahamad M., Jayasilan M.-A., Abdullah M. T. Gastrointestinal parasites of zoonotic importance observed in the wild, urban, and captive populations of non-human primates in Malaysia. Journal of Medical Primatology. 2019; 48 (1): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12389</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adrus M., Zainudin R., Ahamad M., Jayasilan M.-A., Abdullah M. T. Gastrointestinal parasites of zoonotic importance observed in the wild, urban, and captive populations of non-human primates in Malaysia. Journal of Medical Primatology. 2019; 48 (1): 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmp.12389</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boundenga L., Ngoubangoye B., Moukodoum N., Dibakou S. E., Moussadji C., Hugot J. P. Diversity of parasites in two captive chimpanzee populations in southern Gabon. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2021; 91:104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104807</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boundenga L., Ngoubangoye B., Moukodoum N., Dibakou S. E., Moussadji C., Hugot J. P. Diversity of parasites in two captive chimpanzee populations in southern Gabon. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2021; 91:104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104807</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Islam S., Rahman M. K., Uddin M. H., Rahman M. M., Chowdhury M. N. U., Hassan M. M., et al. Prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal parasites in free‐ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in different land gradients of Bangladesh. American Journal of Primatology. 2022; 84 (1):e23345. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23345</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Islam S., Rahman M. K., Uddin M. H., Rahman M. M., Chowdhury M. N. U., Hassan M. M., et al. Prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal parasites in free‐ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in different land gradients of Bangladesh. American Journal of Primatology. 2022; 84 (1):e23345. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23345</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клюева А. К., Егорова Т. П., Дельцов А. А. Паразитофауна яванских макак (Macaca fascicularis). Ветеринария, зоотехния и биотехнология. 2021; 11: 72–77. https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.zoo.bio.202111010</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klyueva A. K., Egorova T. P., Deltsov A. A. Parasite fauna of Javanese macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Veterinariya, Zootekhniya i Biotekhnologiya. 2021; 11: 72–77. https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.zoo.bio.202111010 (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vonfeld I., Prenant T., Polack B., Guillot J., Quintard B. Gastrointestinal parasites in non-human primates in zoological institutions in France. Parasite. 2022; 29:43. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2022040</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vonfeld I., Prenant T., Polack B., Guillot J., Quintard B. Gastrointestinal parasites in non-human primates in zoological institutions in France. Parasite. 2022; 29:43. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2022040</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kumar S., Sundararaj P., Kumara H. N., Pal A., Santhosh K., Vinoth S. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in bonnet macaque and possible consequences of their unmanaged relocations. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 (11):e0207495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207495</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kumar S., Sundararaj P., Kumara H. N., Pal A., Santhosh K., Vinoth S. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in bonnet macaque and possible consequences of their unmanaged relocations. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 (11):e0207495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207495</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">N’da K. M., Dahourou L. D., Ndiaye P. I., Lindshield S., Gbati O. B., Traore A. Gastrointestinal parasites of baboons (Papio papio) in NiokoloKoba National Park, Senegal. Open Veterinary Journal. 2022; 12 (4): 481–488. https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2022.v12.i4.9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">N’da K. M., Dahourou L. D., Ndiaye P. I., Lindshield S., Gbati O. B., Traore A. Gastrointestinal parasites of baboons (Papio papio) in NiokoloKoba National Park, Senegal. Open Veterinary Journal. 2022; 12 (4): 481–488. https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2022.v12.i4.9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tabasshum T., Liza F. T., Rabbe M. F., Mukutmoni M., Alam M. M., Begum A. Occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive Olive Baboon and Common Langur in Bangladesh. Animal Diseases. 2022; 2:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44149-022-00037-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tabasshum T., Liza F. T., Rabbe M. F., Mukutmoni M., Alam M. M., Begum A. Occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) parasites in captive Olive Baboon and Common Langur in Bangladesh. Animal Diseases. 2022; 2:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44149-022-00037-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Petrášová J., Modrý D., Huffman M. A., Mapua M. I, Bobáková L., Mazoch V., et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of indigenous and introduced primate species of Rubondo Island National Park, Tanzania. International Journal of Primatology. 2010; 31: 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-010-9439-x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petrášová J., Modrý D., Huffman M. A., Mapua M. I, Bobáková L., Mazoch V., et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of indigenous and introduced primate species of Rubondo Island National Park, Tanzania. International Journal of Primatology. 2010; 31: 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-010-9439-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Valenta K., Twinomugisha D., Godfrey K., Liu C., Schoof V. A. M., Goldberg T. L., Chapman C. A. Comparison of gastrointestinal parasite communities in vervet monkeys. Integrative Zoology. 2017; 12 (6): 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12270</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Valenta K., Twinomugisha D., Godfrey K., Liu C., Schoof V. A. M., Goldberg T. L., Chapman C. A. Comparison of gastrointestinal parasite communities in vervet monkeys. Integrative Zoology. 2017; 12 (6): 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12270</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kouassi R. Y. W., McGraw S. W., Yao P. K., Abou-Bacar A., Brunet J., Pesson B., et al. Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in seven non-human primates of the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Parasite. 2015; 22:1. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2015001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kouassi R. Y. W., McGraw S. W., Yao P. K., Abou-Bacar A., Brunet J., Pesson B., et al. Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in seven non-human primates of the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Parasite. 2015; 22:1. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2015001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tandan S., Kshetri S., Paudel S., Dhakal P., Kyes R. C., Khanal L. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites in rhesus macaques and local residents in the central mid-hills of Nepal. Helminthologia. 2023; 60 (4): 327–335. https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2023-0037</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tandan S., Kshetri S., Paudel S., Dhakal P., Kyes R. C., Khanal L. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites in rhesus macaques and localresidents in the central mid-hills of Nepal. Helminthologia. 2023; 60 (4): 327–335. https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2023-0037</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
