veterinaryВетеринария сегодняVeterinary Science Today2304-196X2658-6959"Veinard"10.29326/2304-196X-2024-13-4-396-404veterinary-875Research ArticleОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ | ОБЩИЕ ВОПРОСЫORIGINAL ARTICLES | GENERAL ISSUESСитуационный анализ по приоритетным для промышленного свиноводства болезням свиней: пути улучшения биозащиты предприятий в Российской ФедерацииSituational analysis on porcine diseases of priority to pig industry: methods for biosecurity improvement in the Russian Federation holdingshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0061-5799ОганесянА. С.OganesyanA. S.

Оганесян Андрей Серожович, канд. вет. наук, заведующий сектором   информационно-аналитического   центра 

мкр. Юрьевец, г. Владимир, 600901

Andrey S. Oganesyan, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Head of Sector, Information and Analysis Centre

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901, Russia

oganesyan@arriah.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-0109ШибаевМ. А.ShibayevM. A.

Шибаев Михаил Александрович, канд. вет. наук, заведующий  сектором  информационно-аналитического центра 

мкр. Юрьевец, г. Владимир, 600901

Mikhail A. Shibayev, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Head of Sector, Information and Analysis Centre

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901, Russia

shibaev@arriah.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3939-1929ПетроваО. Н.PetrovaO. N.

Петрова Ольга Николаевна, канд. биол. наук, заместитель заведующего  сектором  информационно-аналитического центра 

мкр. Юрьевец, г. Владимир, 600901

Olga N. Petrova, Cand. Sci. (Biology), Deputy Head of the Sector, Information and Analysis Centre

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901, Russia

petrova@arriah.ruБаскаковаН. Е.BaskakovaN. Ye.

Баскакова Наталья Евгеньевна, ведущий специалист информационно-аналитического центра 

мкр. Юрьевец, г. Владимир, 600901

Natalia Ye. Baskakova, Leading Specialist, Information and Analysis Centre

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901, Russia

baskakova@arriah.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5731-5762КарауловА. К.KaraulovA. K.

Караулов Антон Константинович, канд. вет. наук, советник

мкр. Юрьевец, г. Владимир, 600901

Аnton К. Karaulov, Cand. Sci. (Veterinary Medicine), Advisor

Yur’evets, Vladimir 600901, Russia

karaulov@arriah.ruФГБУ «Федеральный центр охраны здоровья животных»РоссияFederal Centre for Animal HealthRussian Federation202414122024134396404Copyright © Оганесян А.С., Шибаев М.А., Петрова О.Н., Баскакова Н.Е., Караулов А.К., 20242024Оганесян А.С., Шибаев М.А., Петрова О.Н., Баскакова Н.Е., Караулов А.К.Oganesyan A.S., Shibayev M.A., Petrova O.N., Baskakova N.Y., Karaulov A.K.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/875

Проведен анализ ситуации по управлению основными значимыми для промышленного свиноводства Российской Федерации эпизоотическими угрозами. Рассмотрены особенности и эффективность различных мер, используемых в системах биозащиты свиноводческих предприятий, и возможные пути их улучшения. Обсуждение путей развития мер биозащиты свиноводческих предприятий и систем в Российской Федерации, способных повлиять на защищенность популяции, вели по четырем направлениям, связанным с путями заноса и распространения инфекций: изолированность популяции от внешних источников угроз (устранение вероятных сценариев воздействия из внешней среды); изолированность популяции от внутренних источников угроз (устранение вероятных сценариев воздействия в потоке производства); изолированность популяции или системы свиноводства от воздействия человеческого фактора (устранение вероятных сценариев воздействия на популяцию человеческого фактора); изолированность популяции от условий, при которых проявлен потенциал угроз (изменение условий). Результаты анализа представили графически в виде принципиальной схемы «Источники угроз для систем биозащиты и меры, направленные на эти источники для формирования защищенной популяции в промышленном свиноводстве». По итогам обсуждения сделано заключение, что автоматизация и цифровизация всех процессов в свиноводстве, создание и внедрение в производство генетически модифицированных свиней, не восприимчивых к таким наиболее значимымвозбудителям, как вирусы африканской чумы свиней, классической чумы свиней, репродуктивно-респираторного синдрома свиней, дальнейшие исследования и внедрение комплексных технологичных решений по санитарии кормов представляются на сегодня эволюционно значимыми путями, которые позволят эффективно интенсифицировать свиноводство в Российской Федерации.

The analysis of the situation on management of main epizootic threats significant for pig industry in the Russian Federation was carried out. The features and effectiveness of various biosecurity measures used in pig holdings and possible ways for their improvement were examined. Options for improvement of biosecurity measures in Russian pig holdings and development of the systems in the Russian Federation having favorable effect on the population protection were discussed focusing on four target aspects related to infection introduction and spread routes: isolation of the population from external sources of threats (elimination of probable environmental impact scenarios); isolation of the population from internal sources of threats (elimination of probable impact scenarios during production process); isolation of the pig population or pig farming system from the human factor impact (elimination of possible scenarios of human factor impact on the population); isolation of the population from the conditions under which the threat potential is manifested (changing of conditions). The analysis results were presented graphically in the form of a schematic diagram“Sources of threats to biosecurity systems and measures aimed at these sources for the protected population creation in pig industry”. Based on the discussion results, automation and digitalization of all processes in pig industry, generation of genetically modified pigs not susceptible to the most significant pathogens such as African swine fever, classical swine fever, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses and their use for production purposes, further research and implementation of integrated technological solutions for feed sanitation have been concluded to be the evolutionarily significant ways for effective pig farming intensification in the Russian Federation.

Работа выполнена за счет средств ФГБУ «ВНИИЗЖ» в рамках тематики научно-исследовательских работ «Ветеринарное благополучие»porcine diseasesepizootic situationpig industrybiosecurityveterinary and sanitary measuresThe study was funded by the Federal Centre for Animal Health within the research topic “Veterinary Welfare”.ReferencesПлаксин И. Е., Плаксин С. И., Трифанов А. В. Тенденции и перспективы развития свиноводства в России. АгроЭкоИнженерия. 2022; (1): 155–168. https://doi.org/10.24412/2713-2641-2022-1110-155-168Plaksin I. E., Plaksin S. I., Trifanov A. V. Trends and prospects of pig breeding development in Russia. AgroEcoEngineering. 2022; (1): 155–168. https://doi.org/10.24412/2713-2641-2022-1110-155-168 (in Russ.)Белая А. Вирусы продолжают подъедать маржу. Мясная отрасль терпит убытки из-за ухудшения эпизоотической ситуации. Агроинвестор. 2022; (2). https://www.agroinvestor.ru/markets/article/37496-virusy-prodolzhayut-podedat-marzhu-myasnaya-otrasl-terpit-ubytki-iz-za-ukhudsheniya-epizooticheskoyBelaya A. Virusy prodolzhayut pod’’edat’marzhu. Myasnaya otrasl’terpit ubytki iz-za ukhudsheniya epizooticheskoi situatsii = Viruses continue to eat up margins. The meat industry is suffering losses due to the animal disease situation deterioration. Agroinvestor. 2022; (2). https://www.agroinvestor.ru/markets/article/37496-virusy-prodolzhayut-podedat-marzhu-myasnaya-otrasl-terpit-ubytki-iz-za-ukhudsheniya-epizooticheskoy (in Russ.)Good practices for biosecurity in the pig sector – Issues and options in developing and transition countries. FAO Animal Production and Health. No. 169. Rome: FAO; 2010. 79 p. https://www.fao.org/4/i1435e/i1435e00.pdfGood practices for biosecurity in the pig sector – Issues and options in developing and transition countries. FAO Animal Production and Health. No. 169. Rome: FAO; 2010. 79 p. https://www.fao.org/4/i1435e/i1435e00.pdfКуликов С. П. Внешняя и внутренняя биобезопасность современного свинокомплекса. Свиноводство. 2021; (4): 45–47. https://elibrary.ru/lewhegKulikov S. P. Internal and external biosecurity in a modern pig farm. Pigbreeding. 2021; (4): 45–47. https://elibrary.ru/lewheg (in Russ.)Оганесян А. С., Гуленкин В. М., Караулов А. К. Методические указания по идентификации, оценке и управлению рисками при импортноэкспортных мероприятиях с животными и продукцией животного происхождения. Владимир: ФГБУ «ВНИИЗЖ»; 2013. 119 с.Oganesyan A. S., Gulenkin V. M., Karaulov А. К. Methodical guidelines for risk identification, assessment and management during live animal and animal product export and import. Vladimir: Federal Centre for Animal Health; 2013. 119 p. (in Russ.)Титов М. А., Караулов А. К., Шевцов А. А., Бардина Н. С., Гуленкин В. М., Дудников С. А. Методические рекомендации по оценке безопасности на свиноводческих предприятиях в Российской Федерации. Владимир; ФГУ «ВНИИЗЖ»; 2010. 53 с.Titov M. A., Karaulov А. К., Shevtsov A. A., Bardina N. S., Gulenkin V. M., Dudnikov S. A. Methodical guidelines for assessment of the biosecurity in pig holdings in the Russian Federation. Vladimir: Federal Centre for Animal Health; 2010. 53 p. (in Russ.)Alarcón L. V., Allepuz A., Mateu E. Biosecurity in pig farms: a review. Porcine Health Management. 2021; 7:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-02000181-zAlarcón L. V., Allepuz A., Mateu E. Biosecurity in pig farms: a review. Porcine Health Management. 2021; 7:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-02000181-zOttoni C., Flink L. G., Evin A., Geörg C., De Cupere B., Van Neer W., et. al. Pig domestication and human-mediated dispersal in western Eurasia revealed through ancient DNA and geometric morphometrics. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013; 30 (4): 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss261Ottoni C., Flink L. G., Evin A., Geörg C., De Cupere B., Van Neer W., et. al. Pig domestication and human-mediated dispersal in western Eurasia revealed through ancient DNA and geometric morphometrics. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013; 30 (4): 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss261Pfeiffer D. U., Ho H. P. J., Bremang A., Kim Y., OIE team. Compartmentalisation Guidelines – African Swine Fever. Paris: World Organisation for Animal Health; 2021. 148 p. https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2021/10/asf-biosecuritychecklist-compartmentalisation-en.pdfPfeiffer D. U., Ho H. P. J., Bremang A., Kim Y., OIE team. Compartmentalisation Guidelines – African Swine Fever. Paris: World Organisation for Animal Health; 2021. 148 p. https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2021/10/asf-biosecuritychecklist-compartmentalisation-en.pdfBlome S., Staubach C., Henke J., Carlson J., Beer M. Classical Swine Fever – An Updated Review. Viruses. 2017; 9 (4):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9040086Blome S., Staubach C., Henke J., Carlson J., Beer M. Classical Swine Fever – An Updated Review. Viruses. 2017; 9 (4):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9040086Havas K. A., Makau D. N., Shapovalov S., Tolkova E., VanderWaal K., Tkachyk T., et al. A molecular and epidemiological description of a severe porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreak in a commercial swine production system in Russia. Viruses. 2022; 14 (2):375. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14020375Havas K. A., Makau D. N., Shapovalov S., Tolkova E., VanderWaal K., Tkachyk T., et al. A molecular and epidemiological description of a severe porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreak in a commercial swine production system in Russia. Viruses. 2022; 14 (2):375. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14020375Dixon L. K., Stahl K., Jori F., Vial L., Pfeiffer D. U. African swine fever epidemiology and control. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 2020; 8: 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083741Dixon L. K., Stahl K., Jori F., Vial L., Pfeiffer D. U. African swine fever epidemiology and control. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 2020; 8: 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083741Brown E., Nelson N., Gubbins S., Colenutt C. Airborne transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus: a review of past and present perspectives. Viruses. 2022; 14 (5):1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14051009Brown E., Nelson N., Gubbins S., Colenutt C. Airborne transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus: a review of past and present perspectives. Viruses. 2022; 14 (5):1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14051009Оганесян А. С., Баскакова Н. Е., Шибаев М. А., Щербинин С. В., Саввин А. В., Шевцов А. А., Караулов А. К. Выявление пробелов, создающих предпосылки к заносу трансграничных болезней с багажом пассажиров. Труды Федерального центра охраны здоровья животных. 2020; 17: 115–142. https://elibrary.ru/invxycOganesyan A. S., Baskakova N. Ye., Shibayev M. A., Scherbinin S. V., Savvin A. V., Shevtsov A. A., Karaulov A. K. Detection of gaps laying the ground work for the introduction of transboundary diseases through passengers’ luggage. Proceedings of the Federal Centre for Animal Health. 2020; 17: 115–142. https://elibrary.ru/invxyc (in Russ.)Desrosiers R. Transmission of swine pathogens: different means, different needs. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2011; 12 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252310000204Desrosiers R. Transmission of swine pathogens: different means, different needs. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2011; 12 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252310000204Dee S., Otake S., Deen J. Use of a production region model to assess the efficacy of various air filtration systems for preventing airborne transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae: results from a 2-year study. Virus Research. 2010; 154 (1–2): 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2010.07.022Dee S., Otake S., Deen J. Use of a production region model to assess the efficacy of various air filtration systems for preventing airborne transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae: results from a 2-year study. Virus Research. 2010; 154 (1–2): 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2010.07.022Alonso C., Murtaugh M. P., Dee S. A., Davies P. R. Epidemiological study of air filtration systems for preventing PRRSV infection in large sow herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2013; 112 (1–2): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.06.001Alonso C., Murtaugh M. P., Dee S. A., Davies P. R. Epidemiological study of air filtration systems for preventing PRRSV infection in large sow herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2013; 112 (1–2): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.06.001Dee S., Cano J. P., Spronk G., Reicks D., Ruen P., Pitkin A., Polson D. Evaluation of the long-term effect of air filtration on the occurrence of new PRRSV infections in large breeding herds in swine-dense regions. Viruses. 2012; 4 (5): 654–662. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4050654Dee S., Cano J. P., Spronk G., Reicks D., Ruen P., Pitkin A., Polson D. Evaluation of the long-term effect of air filtration on the occurrence of new PRRSV infections in large breeding herds in swine-dense regions. Viruses. 2012; 4 (5): 654–662. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4050654WOAH. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-accessWOAH. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-accessScollo A., Perrucci A., Stella M. C., Ferrari P., Robino P., Nebbia P. Biosecurity and hygiene procedures in pig farms: effects of a tailor-made approach as monitored by environmental samples. Animals. 2023; 13 (7):1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071262Scollo A., Perrucci A., Stella M. C., Ferrari P., Robino P., Nebbia P. Biosecurity and hygiene procedures in pig farms: effects of a tailor-made approach as monitored by environmental samples. Animals. 2023; 13 (7):1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071262Шахов А. Г., Ануфриев А., Ануфриев П. Факторные инфекции свиней. Животноводство России. 2005; (cпецвыпуск): 24–27. https://elibrary.ru/zjuyyrShakhov A. G., Anufriev A., Anufriev P. Faktornye infektsii svinei = Porcine factor infections. Animal Husbandry of Russia. 2005; (Suppl.): 24–27. https://elibrary.ru/zjuyyr (in Russ.)Прудников С. И. Факторные инфекционные болезни свиней и их профилактика. Сибирский вестник сельскохозяйственной науки. 2007; (6): 74–80. https://elibrary.ru/hfbgmiPrudnikov S. I. Factor infectious diseases of pigs and preventive measures. Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2007; (6): 74–80. https://elibrary.ru/hfbgmi (in Russ.)Niederwerder M. C., Dee S., Diel D. G., Stoian A. M. M., Constance L. A., Olcha M., et al. Mitigating the risk of African swine fever virus in feed with anti-viral chemical additives. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2021; 68 (2): 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13699Niederwerder M. C., Dee S., Diel D. G., Stoian A. M. M., Constance L. A., Olcha M., et al. Mitigating the risk of African swine fever virus in feed with anti-viral chemical additives. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2021; 68 (2): 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13699Shurson G. C., Urriola P. E., Schroeder D. C. Biosecurity and mitigation strategies to control swine viruses in feed ingredients and complete feeds. Animals. 2023; 13 (14):2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142375Shurson G. C., Urriola P. E., Schroeder D. C. Biosecurity and mitigation strategies to control swine viruses in feed ingredients and complete feeds. Animals. 2023; 13 (14):2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142375Shurson G. C., Palowski A., van de Ligt J. L. G., Schroeder D. C., Balestreri C., Urriola P. E., Sampedro F. New perspectives for evaluating relative risks of African swine fever virus contamination in global feed ingredient supply chains. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2022; 69 (1): 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14174Shurson G. C., Palowski A., van de Ligt J. L. G., Schroeder D. C., Balestreri C., Urriola P. E., Sampedro F. New perspectives for evaluating relative risks of African swine fever virus contamination in global feed ingredient supply chains. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2022; 69 (1): 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14174Niederwerder M. C. Risk and mitigation of African swine fever virus in feed. Animals. 2021; 11 (3):792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030792Niederwerder M. C. Risk and mitigation of African swine fever virus in feed. Animals. 2021; 11 (3):792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030792Dee S. A., Bauermann F. V., Niederwerder M. C., Singrey A., Clement T., de Lima M., et al. Survival of viral pathogens in animal feed ingredients under transboundary shipping models. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 (3):e0194509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194509Dee S. A., Bauermann F. V., Niederwerder M. C., Singrey A., Clement T., de Lima M., et al. Survival of viral pathogens in animal feed ingredients under transboundary shipping models. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13 (3):e0194509. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194509Aquilani C., Confessore A., Bozzi R., Sirtori F., Pugliese C. Review: Precision livestock farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems. Animal. 2022; 16 (1):100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100429Aquilani C., Confessore A., Bozzi R., Sirtori F., Pugliese C. Review: Precision livestock farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems. Animal. 2022; 16 (1):100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100429Zhang M., Wang X., Feng H., Huang Q., Xiao X., Zhang X. Wearable internet of things enabled precision livestock farming in smart farms: A review of technical solutions for precise perception, biocompatibility, and sustainability monitoring. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 312:127712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127712Zhang M., Wang X., Feng H., Huang Q., Xiao X., Zhang X. Wearable internet of things enabled precision livestock farming in smart farms:A review of technical solutions for precise perception, biocompatibility, and sustainability monitoring. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 312:127712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127712Arulmozhi E., Bhujel A., Moon B. E., Kim H. T. The application of cameras in precision pig farming: An overview for swine-keeping professionals. Animals. 2021; 11 (8):2343 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082343Arulmozhi E., Bhujel A., Moon B. E., Kim H. T. The application of cameras in precision pig farming: An overview for swine-keeping professionals. Animals. 2021; 11 (8):2343 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082343Benjamin M., Yik S. Precision livestock farming in swine welfare: A review for swine practitioners. Animals. 2019; 9 (4):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040133Benjamin M., Yik S. Precision livestock farming in swine welfare: A review for swine practitioners. Animals. 2019; 9 (4):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040133Garrido L. F. C., Sato S. T. M., Costa L. B., Daros R. R. Can we reliably detect respiratory diseases through precision farming? A systematic review. Animals. 2023; 13 (7):1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071273Garrido L. F. C., Sato S. T. M., Costa L. B., Daros R. R. Can we reliably detect respiratory diseases through precision farming? A systematic review. Animals. 2023; 13 (7):1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071273Gu M., Hou B., Zhou J., Cao K., Chen X., Duan C. An industrial Internet platform for massive pig farming (IIP4MPF). Journal of Computer and Communications. 2020; 8 (12): 181–196. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2020.812017Gu M., Hou B., Zhou J., Cao K., Chen X., Duan C. An industrial Internet platform for massive pig farming (IIP4MPF). Journal of Computer and Communications. 2020; 8 (12): 181–196. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2020.812017Gómez Y., Stygar A. H., Boumans I. J. M. M., Bokkers E. A. M., Pedersen L. J., Niemi J. K., et. al. A systematic review on validated precision livestock farming technologies for pig production and its potential to assess animal welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021; 8:660565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.660565Gómez Y., Stygar A. H., Boumans I. J. M. M., Bokkers E. A. M., Pedersen L. J., Niemi J. K., et. al. A systematic review on validated precision livestock farming technologies for pig production and its potential to assess animal welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021; 8:660565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.660565Krugmann K. L., Mieloch F. J., Krieter J., Czycholl I. Investigation of influence of growing pigs’positive affective state on behavioral and physiological parameters using structural equation modeling. Journal of Animal Science. 2020; 98 (2):skaa028. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa028Krugmann K. L., Mieloch F. J., Krieter J., Czycholl I. Investigation of influence of growing pigs’positive affective state on behavioral and physiological parameters using structural equation modeling. Journal of Animal Science. 2020; 98 (2):skaa028. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa028Добровлянин В. Д., Антинескул Е. А. Цифровизация сельского хозяйства: текущий уровень цифровизации в Российской Федерации и перспективы дальнейшего развития. Цифровые модели и решения. 2022; 1 (2):5. https://doi.org/10.29141/2782-4934-2022-1-2-5Dobrovlyanin V. D., Antineskul E. A. Digitalization is developing: the level of digitalization in Russia and the prospects for sustainable development. Digital Models and Solutions. 2022; 1 (2):5. https://doi.org/10.29141/2782-4934-2022-1-2-5 (in Russ.)Койнова А. Автоматизация и цифровизация – ключ к эволюции в свиноводстве. Эффективное животноводство. 2020; (8): 66–72. https://elibrary.ru/rzpfwzKoinova A. Avtomatizatsiya i tsifrovizatsiya – klyuch k evolyutsii v svinovodstve = Automation and digitalization – key factors for pig farming evolution. Effectivnoe zhivotnovodstvo. 2020; (8): 66–72. https://www.elibrary.ru/rzpfwz (in Russ.)Смирнова В. В. Цифровые технологии в свиноводстве России. Аграрный вестник Урала. 2022; (8): 91–100. https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2022-223-08-91-100Smirnova V. V. Digital technologies in pig breeding in Russia. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2022; (8): 91‒100. https://doi.org/10.32417/19974868-2022-223-08-91-100 (in Russ.)Zhao X., Qi F., Li H., Shi Z. Improving adsorption effect of modified carbon felt on microorganisms in pig houses. Heliyon. 2022; 8 (12):e12418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12418Zhao X., Qi F., Li H., Shi Z. Improving adsorption effect of modified carbon felt on microorganisms in pig houses. Heliyon. 2022; 8 (12):e12418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12418Hong S.-W., Park J., Jeong H., Kim M. Evaluation of the microbiome composition in particulate matter inside and outside of pig houses. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 2021; 63 (3): 640–650. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e52Hong S.-W., Park J., Jeong H., Kim M. Evaluation of the microbiome composition in particulate matter inside and outside of pig houses. Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 2021; 63 (3): 640–650. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e52Cui H., Zhang C., Liu J., Dong S., Zhao K., Chen L., et al. The distribution characteristics of aerosol bacteria in different types of pig houses. Animals. 2022; 12 (12):1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121540Cui H., Zhang C., Liu J., Dong S., Zhao K., Chen L., et al. The distribution characteristics of aerosol bacteria in different types of pig houses. Animals. 2022; 12 (12):1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121540Lou C., Bai Y., Chai T., Yu H., Lin T., Hu G., et al. Research progress on distribution and exposure risk of microbial aerosols in animal houses. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022; 9:1015238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1015238Lou C., Bai Y., Chai T., Yu H., Lin T., Hu G., et al. Research progress on distribution and exposure risk of microbial aerosols in animal houses. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022; 9:1015238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1015238Герунов Т. В., Герунова Л. К., Плешакова В. И., Конев А. В. Оппортунистические инфекции у животных: причины распространения и меры профилактики. Вестник КрасГАУ. 2022; (10): 152–160. https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2022-10-152-160Gerunov T. V., Gerunova L. K., Pleshakova V. I., Konev A. V. Opportunistic infections in animals: spread causes and preventive measures. Bulletin of KSAU. 2022; (10): 152–160. https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2022-10152-160 (in Russ.)Глазунова А. А., Корогодина Е. В., Севских Т. А., Краснова Е. А., Кукушкин С. А., Блохин А. А. Репродуктивно-респираторный синдром свиней в свиноводческих предприятиях (обзор). Аграрная наука ЕвроСеверо-Востока. 2022; 23 (5): 600–610. https://doi.org/10.30766/20729081.2022.23.5.600-610Glazunova A. А., Korogodina E. V., Sevskikh T. A., Krasnova E. A., Kukushkin S. A., Blokhin A. A. Reproductive and respiratory syndrome of pigs in pig breeding enterprises (review). Agricultural Science Euro-North-East. 2022; 23 (5): 600–610. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2022.23.5.600610 (in Russ.)Алипер Т. И., Алексеев К. П., Шемельков Е. В., Верховский О. А., Забережный А. Д. Перспектива использования маркированных вакцин против классической чумы свиней в Российской Федерации. Научные основы производства и обеспечения качества биологических препаратов: материалы Международной практической конференции, посвященной 100-летию Армавирской биофабрики (Армавир, 20–21 августа 2021 г.). Армавир: ВНИТИБП; 2021; 54–60. https://elibrary.ru/upxsqyAliper T. I., Alekseev K. P., Shemelkov E. V., Verkhovsky O. A., Zaberezhny A. D. The prospect of using marked vaccines against classical swine fever in the Russian Federation. Nauchnye osnovy proizvodstva i obespecheniya kachestva biologicheskikh preparatov: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu Armavirskoi biofabriki (Armavir, 20–21 avgusta 2021 g.) = Scientific basis of biological product manufacturing and quality assurance: proceedings of the International Practical Conference devoted to the 100th anniversary of the Armavir Biofactory (Armavir, 20–21 August, 2021). Armavir: All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Biological Industry; 2021; 54–60. https://elibrary.ru/upxsqy (in Russ.)Hung S. W., Chuang C. K., Wong C. H., Yen C. H., Peng S. H., Yang C., et al. Activated macrophages of CD 163 gene edited pigs generated by direct cytoplasmic microinjection with CRISPR gRNA/Cas9 mRNA are resistant to PRRS virus assault. Animal Biotechnology. 2023; 34 (9): 4196–4209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2062602Hung S. W., Chuang C. K., Wong C. H., Yen C. H., Peng S. H., Yang C., et al. Activated macrophages of CD 163 gene edited pigs generated by direct cytoplasmic microinjection with CRISPR gRNA/Cas9 mRNA are resistant to PRRS virus assault. Animal Biotechnology. 2023; 34 (9): 4196–4209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2062602Lillico S. G., Proudfoot C., King T. J., Tan W., Zhang L., Mardjuki R., et al. Mammalian interspecies substitution of immune modulatory alleles by genome editing. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6:21645. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21645Lillico S. G., Proudfoot C., King T. J., Tan W., Zhang L., Mardjuki R., et al. Mammalian interspecies substitution of immune modulatory alleles by genome editing. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6:21645. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21645

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.